Loss of 5S rDNA units in the evolution of Agropyron, Pseudoroegneria, and Douglasdeweya

Genome

Volumn 51, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 589-598

  Baum, B R ^a   Edwards, T ^a   Johnson, D A ^b  

^a AGRICULTURE AND AGRI FOOD CANADA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Gene loss; Haplome; Nontranscribed spacer; Orthology

Indexed keywords

PLANT DNA; RIBOSOME DNA; RNA 5S;

AGROPYRON; ARTICLE; CONSENSUS SEQUENCE; GENETICS; GENOME; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; POACEAE;

AGROPYRON; BASE SEQUENCE; CONSENSUS SEQUENCE; DNA, PLANT; DNA, RIBOSOMAL; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENOME, PLANT; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; POACEAE; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 5S;

AGROPYRON; PSEUDOROEGNERIA; TRITICEAE;

EID: 49249124045     PISSN: 08312796     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/G08-045     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Altschul, S.F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E.W., and Lipman, D.J. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215: 403-410. PMID:2231712.
2. Appels, R., Baum, B.R., and Clarke, B.C. 1992. The 5S DNA units of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Syst. Evol. 183: 183-194. doi:10.1007/BF00940802.
3. Bandelt, H.-J., and Dress, A.W.M. 1992. A canonical decomposition theory for metrics on a finite set. Adv. Math. 92: 47-105. doi:10.1016/0001- 8708(92)90061-O.
4. Baum, B.R., and Johnson, D.A. 1994. The molecular diversity of the 5S rRNA gene in barley (Hordeum vulgare). Genome, 37: 992-998. doi:10.1139/g94-140. PMID:7828846.
5. Baum, B.R., and Johnson, D.A. 1996. The 5S rRNA gene units in ancestral two-row barley (Hordeum spontaneum C. Koch) and bulbous barley (H. bulbosum L.): sequence analysis and phylogenetic relationships with the 5S rDNA units in cultivated barley (H. vulgare L.). Genome, 39: 140-149. doi:10.1139/g96-019. PMID:8851803.
6. Baum, B.R., and Johnson, D.A. 1998. The 5S rRNA gene in sea barley (Hordeum marinum Hudson sensu lato): sequence variation among repeat units and relationship to the X haplome in barley (Hordeum). Genome, 41: 652-661. doi:10.1139/gen-41-5-652. PMID:9809436.
7. Baum, B.R., and Johnson, D.A. 2003. The South African Hordeum capense is more closely related to some American Hordeum species than to the European Hordeum secalinum: a perspective based on the 5S DNA units (Triticeae: Poaceae). Can. J. Bot. 81: 1-11. doi:10.1139/b03-001.
8. Baum, B.R., and Johnson, D.A. 2007. The 5S DNA sequences in Hordeum bogdanii and in the H. brevisubulatum complex, and the evolution and the geographic dispersal of the diploid Hordeum species (Triticeae: Poaceae). Genome, 50: 1-14. doi:10.1139/G06-132. PMID:17546066.
9. Baum, B.R., Johnson, D.A., and Bailey, L.G. 2001. Defining groups among multicopy genes prior to inferring phylogeny, with special emphasis on the Triticeae (Poaceae). Hereditas, 135: 123-138. doi:10.1111/j.1601-5223. 2001.00123.x. PMID:12152325.
10. Bryant, D., and Moulton, V. 2002. NeighborNet: An agglomerative method for the construction of planar phylogenetic networks. In Algorithms in bioinformatics. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 2452. Edited by R. Guigó and D. Gusfield. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. pp. 375-391.
11. Cliften, P.E., Fulton, R.S., Wilson, R.K., and Johnston, M. 2006. After the duplication: gene loss and adaptation in Saccharomyces genomes. Genetics, 172: 863-872. doi:10.1534/genetics.105.048900. PMID:16322519.
12. Dewey, D.R. 1975. Genome relations of diploid Agropyron libanoticum with diploid and autotetraploid Agropyron stipifolium. Bot. Gaz. 136: 116-121. doi:10.1086/336791.
13. Dewey, D.R. 1984. The genomic system of classification as a guide to intergeneric hybridization with perennial Triticeae. In Gene manipulation in plant improvement. Edited by J.P. Gustafson. Plenum Press, New York. pp. 209-279.
14. Doyle, J.J., Doyle, J.L., and Harbison, C. 2003. Chloroplast-expressed glutamine synthetase in Glycine and related Leguminosae: phylogeny, gene duplication, and ancient polyploidy. Syst. Bot. 28: 567-577.
15. Farris, J.S. 1970. Methods for computing Wagner trees. Syst. Zool. 19: 83-92. doi:10.2307/2412028.
16. Gaertner, J. 1770. Observationes et descriptions botanicae. Nov. Comm. Petrop. 14: 531-547.
17. Hendy, M.D., and Penny, D. 1982. Branch and bound algorithms to determine minimal evolutionary trees. Math. Biosci. 59: 277-290. doi:10.1016/0025-5564(82)90027-X.
18. Hitchcock, A.S. 1951. Manual of grasses of the United States. 2nd ed. Revised by A. Chase. USDA Misc. Publ. No. 200. Washington, D.C.
19. Hsiao, C., Wang, R.R.-C., and Dewey, D.R. 1986. Karyotype analysis and genome relationships of 22 diploid species in the tribe Triticeae. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 28: 109-120.
20. Huson, D.H., and Bryant, D. 2006. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23: 254-267. doi:10.1093/molbev/ msj030. PMID:16221896.
21. Jackson, A.P. 2005. The effect of paralogous lineages on the application of reconciliation analysis by cophylogeny mapping. Syst. Biol. 54: 127-145. doi:10.1080/10635150590905911. PMID:15805015.
22. Krylov, D.M., Wolf, Y.I., Rogozin, I.B., and Koonin, E.V. 2003. Gene loss, protein sequence divergence, gene dispensability, expression level, and interactivity are correlated in eukaryotic evolution. Genome Res. 13: 2229-2235. doi:10.1101/gr.1589103. PMID:14525925.
23. Levy, A.A., and Feldman, M. 2002. The impact of polyploidy on grass genome evolution. Plant Physiol. 130: 1587-1593. doi:10.1104/pp.015727. PMID:12481041.
24. Löve, Á. 1980. Poaceae-Triticeae-americanae. Taxon, 29: 166-169. doi:10.2307/1220319.
25. Löve, Á. 1984. Conspectus of the Triticeae. Feddes Repert. 95: 425-521.
26. Nei, M., and Li, W.-H. 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 76: 5269-5273. doi:10.1073/pnas.76.10.5269. PMID:291943.
27. Nevski, S.A. 1934. Schedae ad Herbarium Florae Asiae Mediae, Fasc. XXI-XXIII. Tr. Sredne-Aziat. Gos. Univ., Ser. 8b, Bot. 17: 60 [under 547b. Elytrigia trichophora (Link) Nevski].
28. Nevski, S.A. 1936. Tr. Bot. Inst. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1: 33-85 [Elytrigia Desv. Sect. II. Pseudoroegneria Nevski 77-78].
29. Nicholas, K.B., and Nicholas, H.B., Jr. 1997. GeneDoc: a tool for editing and annotating multiple sequence alignments. Distributed by the authors. Available from www.psc.edu/biomed/genedoc/ [accessed January 2007].
30. Page, R.D.M. 1995. TreeMap 1.0 user's guide. Available from http://taxonomy.zoology.gla.ac.uk/rod/treemap/ch1.html [accessed January 2007].
31. Page, R.D.M. 1996. TREEVIEW: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 12: 357-358. PMID:8902363.
32. Page, R.D.M. and Charleston, M.A. 1997. Reconciled trees and incongruent gene and species trees. In Mathematical hierarchies in biology. Vol. 37. Edited by B. Mirkin, F.R. McMorris, F.S. Roberts, and A. Rzhetsky. American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I. pp. 57-70.
33. Saitou, N., and Nei, M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4: 406-425. PMID:3447015.
34. Scannell, D.R., Byrne, K.P., Gordon, J.L., Wong, S., and Wolfe, K.H. 2006. Multiple rounds of speciation associated with reciprocal gene loss in polyploid yeasts. Nature (London), 440: 341-345. doi:10.1038/nature04562. PMID:16541074.
35. Stebbins, G.L., and Punn, F.T. 1953. Artificial and natural hybrids in the Gramineae, tribe Hordeae. V. Diploid hybrids of Agropyron. Am. J. Bot. 40: 444-449. doi:10.2307/2438528.
36. Swofford, D.L. 1998. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.
37. Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G., and Gibson, T.J. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22: 4673-4680. doi:10.1093/nar/22.22.4673. PMID:7984417.
38. Tsvelev, N.N. 1976. Zlaki SSSR [Grasses of the Soviet Union]. Nauka, Leningrad [Translation in English by Amerind Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, for Smithsonian Institution Libraries and National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C., 1983].
39. Wang, R.R.-C. 1989. An assessment of genome analysis based on chromosome pairing in hybrids of perennial Triticeae. Genome, 32: 179-189. doi:10.1139/g89-427.
40. Wang, R.R.-C. 1992. Genome relationships in the perennial Triticeae based on diploid hybrids and beyond. Hereditas, 116: 133-136. doi:10.1111/j.1601-5223.1992.tb00217.x.
41. Wei, J.Z., and Wang, R.R.-C. 1995. Genome- and species-specific markers and genome relationships of diploid perennial species in Triticeae based on RAPD analyses. Genome, 38: 1230-1236. doi:10.1139/g95-161. PMID:18470242.
42. Yanisch-Perron, C., Vieira, J., and Messing, J. 1985. Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: nucleotide sequence of M13mp18 and pUC19 vectors. Gene, 33: 103-119. doi:10.1016/0378-1119(85)90120-9. PMID:2985470.
43. Yen, C., Yang, J.L., and Baum, B.R. 2005. Douglasdeweya: a new genus, with a new species and a new combination (Triticeae: Poaceae). Can. J. Bot. 83: 413-419. doi:10.1139/b05-018.
44. Zhu, J., Sanborn, J.Z., Diekhans, M., Lowe, C.B., Pringle, T.H., and Haussler, D. 2007. Comparative genomics search for losses of long-established genes on the human lineage. PLOS Comput. Biol. 3(12): e247. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030247.