Salinograph trends as indicators of the recession characteristics of stream components

Hydrological Processes

Volumn 22, Issue 16, 2008, Pages 3020-3028

  Werner, Adrian D ^a   Wood, M ^a   Simmons, C T ^a   Lockington, D A ^b  

^a FLINDERS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Base flow separation; Groundwater surface water interaction; Recession analysis; Salinograph

Indexed keywords

EARTH SCIENCES; TECHNOLOGY; WATER;

BASE FLOW SEPARATION; ENGINEERING HYDROLOGY; GROUNDWATER-SURFACE WATER INTERACTION; HYDROGRAPH; INVERSE RELATIONSHIP; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSES; QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENTS; RECESSION ANALYSIS; RECESSION CHARACTERISTICS; SALINOGRAPH;

SALINITY MEASUREMENT;

ALGORITHM; BASEFLOW; FLOW FIELD; GROUNDWATER-SURFACE WATER INTERACTION; HYDROGRAPH; RUNOFF; SALINITY; STREAMFLOW; STREAMWATER; WATER QUALITY;

AUSTRALASIA; AUSTRALIA; QUEENSLAND; SANDY CREEK; SCOTT CREEK;

EID: 49249121230     PISSN: 08856087     EISSN: 10991085     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.6883     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Arnold JG, Allen PM, Muttiah R, Bernhardt G. 1995. Automated base flow separation and recession analysis techniques. Ground Water 33: 1010-1018.
2. Beighley RE, Dunne T, Melack JM. 2005. Understanding and modeling basin hydrology: interpreting the hydrogeological signature. Hydrological Processes 19: 1333-1353. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.5567.
3. Caissie D, Pollock TL, Cunjak RA. 1996. Variation in stream water chemistry and hydrograph separation in a small drainage basin. Journal of Hydrology 178: 137-157.
4. Chapman T. 1999. A comparison of algorithms for stream flow recession and baseflow separation. Hydrological Processes 13: 701-714.
5. Cordery I. 1993. The unit hydrograph method of flood estimation. In Australian Rainfall and Runoff - A Guide to Flood Estimation. Pilgrim DH (ed). The Institution of Engineers: Australia, Canberra, pp. 153-172.
6. Crandall CA, Katz BG, Hirten JJ. 1999. Hydrochemical evidence for mixing of river water and groundwater during high-flow conditions, lower Suwannee River basin, Florida, USA. Hydrogeology Journal 7: 454-467.
7. Foster HJ, Lees MJ, Wheater HS, Neal C, Reynolds B. 2001. A hydrochemical modelling framework for combined assessment of spatial and temporal variability in stream chemistry: application to Plynlimon, Wales. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 5: 49-58.
8. Harrington GA. 2004. Hydrogeological investigation of the Mount Lofty Ranges, Progress report 4: Groundwater-surface water interactions in the Scott Creek, Marne River and Tookayerta Creek catchments. DWLBC Report 2004/11, Government of South Australia, Adelaide, 56 p.
9. James-Smith JM, Harrington GA. 2002. Hydrogeological investigation of the Mount Lofty Ranges, progress report 1: Hydrogeology and drilling phase 1 for Scott Creek catchment. DWLBC Report 2002/17, Government of South Australia, Adelaide, 47 p.
10. Jarvie HP, Neal C, Smart R, Owen R, Fraser D, Forbes I, Wade A. 2001. Use of continuous water quality records for hydrograph separation and to assess short-term variability in extremes in acidity and dissolved carbon dioxide for the River Dee, Scotland. The Science of the Total Environment 265: 85-98.
11. Joerin C, Beven KJ, Iorgulescu I, Musy A. 2002. Uncertainty in hydrograpb separations based on geochemical mixing models. Journal of Hydrology 255: 90-106.
12. Ladouche B, Probst A, Viville D, Idir S, Baque D, Loubet M, Probst J- L, Bariac T. 2001. Hydrograph separation using isotopic, chemical and hydrological approaches (Strengbach catchment, France). Journal of Hydrology 242: 255-274.
13. 86Sr ratios in soil water and groundwater: implications for relative contributions to stream water discharge. Applied Geochemistry 15: 311-325.
14. Lyne VD, Hollick M. 1979. Stochastic time-variable rainfall-runoff modelling. In Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium, Institution of Engineers Australia: Perth, pp. 89-92.
15. McNamara JP, Kane DL, Hinzman LD. 1997. Hydrograph separation in an Arctic watershed using mixing model and graphical techniques. Water Resources Research 33: 1707-1719.
16. Mulholland PJ. 1993. Hydrometric and stream chemistry evidence of three storm flowpaths in Walker Branch Watershed. Journal of Hydrology 151: 291-316.
17. Nathan RJ, McMahon TA. 1990. Evaluation of automated techniques for base flow and recession analysis. Water Resources Research 26: 1465-1473.
18. Peters E, van Lanen HAJ. 2005. Separation of base flow from streamflow using groundwater levels - illustrated for the Pang catchment (UK). Hydrological Processes 19: 921-936. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.5548.
19. Pinder GF, Jones JF. 1969. Determination of the ground-water component of peak discharge from the chemistry of total runoff, Water Resources Research 5: 438-445.
20. Sujono J, Shikasho S, Hiramatsu K. 2004. A comparison of techniques for hydrograph recession analysis. Hydrological Processes 18: 403-413. DOI: 10-1002/hyp.1247.
21. Tallaksen LM. 1995. A review of baseflow recession analysis. Journal of Hydrology 165: 349-370.
22. Werner AD, Gallagher MR, Weeks SW. 2006. Regional-scale, fully coupled modelling of stream-aquifer interaction in a tropical catchment. Journal of Hydrology 328: 497-510. DOI: 10.1016/ j.jhydrol.2005.12.034.