A case series of the use of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in emergency lower abdominal surgery

Anaesthesia

Volumn 63, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 967-971

  Fabregat Lopez J ^a   Garcia Rojo, B ^a   Cook, T M ^b  

^a University Hospital Rosell   (Spain)

^b ROYAL UNITED HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROPOFOL; REMIFENTANIL; ROCURONIUM;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIA; APPENDECTOMY; ARTICLE; EMERGENCY SURGERY; FEMALE; GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX; HUMAN; LARYNGEAL MASK; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT SELECTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RISK FACTOR; SCHOOL CHILD;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; APPENDECTOMY; CHILD; EMERGENCIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LARYNGEAL MASKS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL;

EID: 49249116359     PISSN: 00032409     EISSN: 13652044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05539.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. El-Ganzouri A, Avramov M, Budac S, Moric M, Tuman K. ProSeal laryngeal mask airway versus endotraqueal tube: ease of insertion, hemodynamic responses and emergence characteristics. Anesthesiology 2003 99 : A571.
2. Cook TM, Silsby J, Simpson TP. Airway rescue in acute upper airway obstruction using a ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and an aintree catheter: a review of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in the management of the difficult airway. Anaesthesia 2005 60 : 1129 36.
3. Brimacombe J, Keller C. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology 2000 93 : 104 9.
4. Brain AIJ, Verghese C, Strube PJ. The LMA "ProSeal"- a laryngeal mask with an oesophageal vent. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2000 84 : 650 4.
5. Cook TM, Lee G, Nolan JP. The ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway: a review of the literature. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2005 52 : 739 60.
6. Bercker S, Scmidbauer W, Volk T, et al. A comparison of seal in seven supraglottic airway devices using a cadaver model of elevated esophageal pressure. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2008 106 : 445 8.
7. Drolet P, Girard M. An aid to correct positioning of the ProSeal laryngeal mask. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2001 48 : 718 9.
8. Garcia-Aguado R, Vivo M, Duran R. New method for inserting the ProSeal laryngeal mask using an aspiration catheter in a case of difficult airway. Revista Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación 2004 51 : 59 9.
9. Aoyama K, Takenaka I, Sata T, Shigematsu A. The triple airway manoeuvre for insertion of the laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed patients. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 1995 42 : 1010 6.
10. Kihara S, Brimacombe J. Sex-based ProSeal laryngeal mask airway size selection: a randomized crossover study of anesthetized, paralyzed male and female adult patients. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2003 97 : 280 4.
11. Kihara S, Brimacombe J, Yaguchi Y, Taguchi N, Watanabe S. A comparison of sex-and weight-based ProSeal laryngeal mask size selection criteria: a randomized study of healthy anesthetized, paralyzed adult patients. Anesthesiology 2004 101 : 340 3.
12. Keller C, Brimacombe JR, Keller K, Morris R. Comparison of four methods for assessing airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in adult patients. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1999 82 : 286 7.
13. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Judd DV. Gum elastic bougie-guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is superior to the digital and introducer tool techniques. Anesthesiology 2004 100 : 25 9.
14. Neilipovitz DT, Crosby ET. No evidence for decreased incidence of aspiration after rapid sequence induction. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2007 54 : 748 64.
15. Li CW, Xue FS, Xu YC, et al. Cricoid pressure impedes insertion of, and ventilation through, the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, paralyzed patients. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2007 104 : 1195 8.
16. Tanaka A, Isono S, Ishikawa T, Sato J, Nishino T. Laryngeal resistance before and after minor surgery: endotracheal tube versus laryngeal mask airway trade mark. Anesthesiology 2003 99 : 252 8.
17. Hohlrieder M, Brimacombe J, von Goedecke A, C Keller. Postoperative nausea, vomiting, airway morbidity and analgesic requirements are lower for the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway than the tracheal tube in females undergoing breast and gynaecological surgery. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2007 99 : 576 80.
18. Hohlrieder M, Brimacombe J, Eschertzhuber S, Ulmer H, Keller C. A study of airway management using the ProSeal LMA laryngeal mask airway compared with the tracheal tube on postoperative analgesia requirements following gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. Anaesthesia 2007 62 : 913 8.
19. Keller C, Brimacombe J, Kleinsasser A, Loekinger A. Does the Pro-Seal laryngeal mask airway prevent aspiration of regurgitated fluid? Anesthesia and Analgesia 2000 91 : 1017 20.
20. Maltby JR, Beriault MT, Watson NC, Liepert D, Fick GH. The LMA-ProSeal™ is an effective alternative to tracheal intubation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2002 49 : 857 62.
21. Lu PP, Brimacombe J, Yang C, Shyr M. ProSeal vs cLMA for IPPV during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2002 88 : 824 7.
22. Reich DL, Hossain S, Krol M, et al. Predictors of hypotension after induction of general anaesthesia. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2005 101 : 622 8.
23. Hanley JA, Lippman-Hand A. If nothing goes wrong is everything all right? Journal of the American Medical Association 1983 249 : 1743 5.
24. Barker P, Langton JA, Murfhy PS, Rowbotham DJ. Regurgitation of gastric contents during general anaesthesia using the laryngeal mask airway. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1992 69 : 314 5.
25. Thibodeau LG, Verdile VP, Bartfield JM. Incidence of aspiration after urgent intubation. American Journal of Emergency Medicine 1997 15 : 562 5.
26. Oehkern L, Tilmant C, Gindre G, Calon B, Bazin JE. Is cricoid pressure efficient? The first evidence Anesthesiology 2003 99 : A 1235.
27. Fabregat J, De Arce C, Brimacombe J. Successful use of the classic LMA after failed use of the Proseal LMA. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 2006 34 : 283.