-
1
-
-
4844231570
-
Incongruence between test statistics and P values in medical papers
-
15169550. 10.1186/1471-2288-4-13
-
Incongruence between test statistics and P values in medical papers. E Garcia-Berthou C Alcaraz, BMC Med Res Methodol 2004 4 13 15169550 10.1186/1471-2288-4-13
-
(2004)
BMC Med Res Methodol
, vol.4
, pp. 13
-
-
Garcia-Berthou, E.1
Alcaraz, C.2
-
2
-
-
2942535852
-
Sloppy stats shame science
-
Sloppy stats shame science. Anonymous, Economist 2004 371 74 76
-
(2004)
Economist
, vol.371
, pp. 74-76
-
-
Anonymous1
-
3
-
-
33749349530
-
Error in statistical tests of error in statistical tests
-
16970820. 10.1186/1471-2288-6-45
-
Error in statistical tests of error in statistical tests. M Jeng, BMC Med Res Methodol 2006 6 45 16970820 10.1186/1471-2288-6-45
-
(2006)
BMC Med Res Methodol
, vol.6
, pp. 45
-
-
Jeng, M.1
-
5
-
-
0023149041
-
Beyond the confidence interval
-
3799860
-
Beyond the confidence interval. C Poole, Am J Public Health 1987 77 195 199 3799860
-
(1987)
Am J Public Health
, vol.77
, pp. 195-199
-
-
Poole, C.1
-
6
-
-
0027689947
-
Casual inference
-
10.1097/00001648-199311000-00013. 8268286
-
Casual inference. KJ Rothman S Lanes J Robins, Epidemiology 1993 4 555 556 10.1097/00001648-199311000-00013 8268286
-
(1993)
Epidemiology
, vol.4
, pp. 555-556
-
-
Rothman, K.J.1
Lanes, S.2
Robins, J.3
-
7
-
-
0035055672
-
It's time to rehabilitate the P-value
-
10.1097/00001648-200105000-00004. 11337598
-
It's time to rehabilitate the P-value. CR Weinberg, Epidemiology 2001 12 288 290 10.1097/00001648-200105000-00004 11337598
-
(2001)
Epidemiology
, vol.12
, pp. 288-290
-
-
Weinberg, C.R.1
-
8
-
-
0035063893
-
Low P-values or narrow confidence intervals: Which are more durable?
-
10.1097/00001648-200105000-00005. 11337599
-
Low P-values or narrow confidence intervals: which are more durable? C Poole, Epidemiology 2001 12 291 294 10.1097/00001648-200105000-00005 11337599
-
(2001)
Epidemiology
, vol.12
, pp. 291-294
-
-
Poole, C.1
-
9
-
-
49249113653
-
Least significant p-value digits are not uniformly distributed
-
Least significant p-value digits are not uniformly distributed. S Senn, BMC Medical Research Methodology 2007 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/6/ 45/comments/comments
-
(2007)
BMC Medical Research Methodology
-
-
Senn, S.1
-
10
-
-
0027471290
-
P values, hypothesis tests, and likelihood: Implications for epidemiology of a neglected historical debate
-
8465801
-
p values, hypothesis tests, and likelihood: implications for epidemiology of a neglected historical debate. SN Goodman, Am J Epidemiol 1993 137 485 496 8465801
-
(1993)
Am J Epidemiol
, vol.137
, pp. 485-496
-
-
Goodman, S.N.1
-
11
-
-
4844223339
-
Publication bias in situ
-
15296515. 10.1186/1471-2288-4-20
-
Publication bias in situ. CV Phillips, BMC Med Res Methodol 2004 4 20 15296515 10.1186/1471-2288-4-20
-
(2004)
BMC Med Res Methodol
, vol.4
, pp. 20
-
-
Phillips, C.V.1
-
12
-
-
33750437256
-
Generalizability in two clinical trials of Lyme disease
-
10.1186/1742-5573-3-12
-
Generalizability in two clinical trials of Lyme disease. DJ Cameron, Epidemiologic Perspectives & Innovations 2006 3 12 10.1186/1742-5573-3-12
-
(2006)
Epidemiologic Perspectives & Innovations
, vol.3
, pp. 12
-
-
Cameron, D.J.1
-
13
-
-
33646228403
-
Reproducible epidemiologic research
-
10.1093/aje/kwj093. 16510544
-
Reproducible epidemiologic research. RD Peng F Dominici SL Zeger, Am J Epidemiol 2006 163 783 789 10.1093/aje/kwj093 16510544
-
(2006)
Am J Epidemiol
, vol.163
, pp. 783-789
-
-
Peng, R.D.1
Dominici, F.2
Zeger, S.L.3
-
14
-
-
19744382755
-
Statistically significant
-
10.1038/nm0105-1. 15635418
-
Statistically significant. Anonymous, Nat Med 2005 11 1 10.1038/nm0105-1 15635418
-
(2005)
Nat Med
, vol.11
, pp. 1
-
-
Anonymous1
-
15
-
-
3042578177
-
Quantifying errors without random sampling
-
12892568. 10.1186/1471-2288-3-9
-
Quantifying errors without random sampling. CV Phillips LM LaPole, BMC Med Res Methodol 2003 3 9 12892568 10.1186/1471-2288-3-9
-
(2003)
BMC Med Res Methodol
, vol.3
, pp. 9
-
-
Phillips, C.V.1
Lapole, L.M.2
|