Electronic-nose technique: Potential for monitoring maturity and shelf life of tomatoes

New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research

Volumn 50, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 1219-1228

  Wang, Jun ^a   Zhou, Yibin ^a  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Electronic nose; Evaluation; Maturity; Shelf life; Tomato fruit

Indexed keywords

DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; MATURATION; MONITORING; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; VEGETABLE;

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM;

EID: 49249090968     PISSN: 00288233     EISSN: 11758775     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00288230709510405     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Berna, AZ, Lammertyn, J, and Saevels, S., 2004. Electronic nose systems to study shelf life and cultivar effect on tomato aroma profile. Sensors and Actuators B, 97:324–333.
2. Bharathi, SR, and Varadaraj, MC. 2001. Predicting the behavioural pattern of Escherichia coli in minimally processed vegetables. Food Control, 12:275–284.
3. Bisogni, CA, Armbruster, G, and Brecht, PE. 1976. Quality comparisons of room ripened and field ripened tomatoes. Journal of Food Science, 41:333–338.
4. Brezmes, J, Vilanova, X, Orts, J, Saiz, G., and Correig, X. 2001. Correlation between electronic nose signals and fruit quality indicators on shelf-life measurements with pinklady apples. Sensors and Actuators B, 80:41–50.
5. Dittmann, B, Zimmermann, B, Engelen, C, Jany, G, and Nitz, S. 2000. Use of the MS-sensor to discriminate between different dosages of garlic flavoring in tomato sauce. Journal of agricultural and Food Chemistry, 48:2887–2892.
6. Gomez, AH, Wang, J, Hu, G, and Pereira, AG. 2006. Electronic nose technique potential monitoring mandarin maturity. Sensors and Actuators B, 113:347–353.
7. Hai, Z, and Wang, J. 2006. Electronic nose and data analysis for detection of maize oil adulteration in sesame oil. Sensors and Actuators B, 119:449–455.
8. Höskuldsson, A. 1988. PLS regression methods. Journal of Chemometrics, 2:211–228.
9. Lesage, P, and Destain, MF. 1996. Measurement of tomato firmness by using a non-destructive mechanical sensor. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 8:45–55.
10. Li, MQ. 1989. Fruit physiology, 234Beijing:Science Press.
11. Martens, HA, and Dardenne, P. 1998. Validation and verification of regression in small data sets. Chemometr Intelligence Laboratory, 44:99–121.
12. Mckellar, RC, Rupasinghe, HPV, Lu, X, and Knight, KP. 2005. The electronic nose as a tool for the classification of fruit and grape wines from different Ontario wineries. Journal ofthe Science of Food and Ag-riculture, 85:2391–2396.
13. Meloun, M, Militky, J, and Forina, M. 1992. Chemometrics for analytical chemistry, New York, USA:Ellis Horwood.
14. Oshita, S, Shima, K, Haruta, T, Seo, Y, Kagawoe, Y, Nakayama, S, and Kawana, S. 2000. Discrimination of odors emanating from ‘La France’ pear by semi-conducting polymer sensors. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 26:209–216.
15. Saevels, S, Lammertyn, J, Berna, AZ, Veraverbeke, EA, Natale, CD, and Nicolaï, BM. 2003. Electronic nose as a non-destructive tool to evaluate the optimal harvest date of apples. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 30:3–14.
16. Saevels, S, Lammertyn, J, Berna, AZ, Veraverbeke, EA, Natale, CD, and Nicolaï, BM. 2004. An electronic nose and a mass spectrometry-based electronic nose for assessing apple quality during shelf life. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 31:9–19.
17. Shahidul, MI, Matsui, T, and Yoshida, Y. 1996. Effect of carbon dioxide enrichment on physico-chemical and enzymatic changes in tomato fruits at various stages of maturity. Scientia Horticulturae, 65:137–149.
18. USA Department of Agriculture. 1975. Colour classification requirements in tomatoes, visual aid TM-L-1, Lansing, MI, USA:The John Henry Co.
19. Vazquez, MJ, Lorenzo, RA, and Cela, R. 2003. The use of an ‘electronic nose’ device to monitor the ripening process of anchovies. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 38:273–284.
20. Wang, J, Teng, B, and Yu, Y. 2004. Pear dynamic characteristics and firmness detection. European Food Research and Technology, 218:289–294.
21. Wang, J, Gomez, AH, and Pereira, AG. 2006a. Acoustic impulse response for measuring the firmness of mandarin during storage. Journal of Food Quality, 29:392–404.
22. Wang, J, Teng, B, and Yu, Y. 2006b. The firmness detection by excitation dynamic characteristic for peach. Food Control, 17:353–358.
23. Wu, TX, and Abbott, JA. 2002. Firmness and force relaxation characteristics of tomatoes storedintact or as slices. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 24:59–68.