The Method of Open Co-Ordination: Open Procedures or Closed Circuit? Social Policy Making between Science and Politics

European Journal of Social Security

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 331-341

  Berghman, Jos ^a   Okma, Kieke GH ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 49249088819     PISSN: 13882627     EISSN: 23992948     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/138826270200400403     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Atkinson M.M., and Coleman W.D., Policy Networks, Policy Communities and the Problems of Governance. Governance, 5, 154–180, 1992.
2. Atkinson T., Cantillon B., Marlier E., and Nolan B., Indicators for Social Inclusion in the European Union. Report Submitted to the Belgian Presidency of the European Union, 2001.
3. Cohen J., and Sabel C.F., Sovereignty and Solidarity: EU and US (forthcoming) EHMA, The Impact of Market Forces on health Systems. Scientific Evaluation of the Effects of the Introduction of Market Forces into Health Systems. Dublin: European Health Management Association, 2000.
4. Esping-Andersen G., The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1990.
5. Esping-Andersen G., Gallie D., Hemerijck A., and Myles J., A New Welfare Architecture for Europe? Report Submitted to the Belgian Presidency of the European Union, 2001.
6. Hemerijck A., Vier beleidsvragen. Een conceptueel-empirische verkenning. (draft manuscript). Departement Bestuurskunde, Leiden, 2001.
7. Hemerijck A., and Visser J., Learning and Mimicking: How European Welfare States Reform. Achtergrondpaper, 2001.
8. Klee M, Convenanten als beleidsinstrument in de gezondheidszorg. Pact met de duivel of even goede vrienden? Afstudeerscriptie bestuurskunde. Rotterdam: Erasmus Universiteit, 2000.
9. Mossialos E., McKee M., Palm W., Karl B., and Marhold F., The Influence of EU Law on the Social Character of Health Care Systems in the European Union. Report Submitted to the Belgian Presidency of the European Union, 2001.
10. European Commission, Structural Indicators. Annex 2 to the Stockholm report. Com (2001) 79. Synthesis report, 2001.
11. Towards a Europe of Social Justice. Brochure, uitgegeven door het Belgische Voorzitterschap van de EU, 2001
12. OECD, Society at a Glance. OECD Social Indicators. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2001.
13. Stanbury W.T., Business-Government Relations in Canada. Grappling with Leviathan. Toronto: Methuen, 1986.
14. Vandenbroucke F., Samen werken aan duurzame rechtvaardigheid. ESB. October, 776–778, 2001a.
15. Vandenbroucke F., Open Co-ordination and Sustainable Social Justice in Europe. Closing Address at the Conference Towards a New Architecture for Social Protection in Europe? Ghent, 19–20 October, 2001b.
16. Van der Doelen F.C.J., and Klok P.J., Beleidsinstrumenten. In Hoogerwerf A., and Herweijer M., Overheidsbeleid: Een inleiding in de beleidswetenschap. Alphen aan de Rijn: Samson, 1998.
17. Van der Gevel A.D., and Van de Goor H., Bestuur en systeem: Een inleiding in de bestuurskunde. Utrecht: Lemma BV, 1989.
18. Van der Grinten T.E.D., Veranderingen in het maatschappelijke middenveld. Factoren die de beleidsnetwerken beïnvloeden. Medisch Contact, 13, 425–427, 1994.
19. WHO, Health for All in the Year 2000. Geneva: World Health Organisation, 1978.
20. Zeitlin J., The Open Method of Coordination and the Future of the European Employment Strategy. Presentation for the mini-hearing of the Employment and Social Affairs Committee of the European Parliament on the first five year evaluation of the Employment Guidelines, 8 July 2002.