Data quality and query cost in pervasive sensing systems

6th Annual IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications, PerCom 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 195-205

  Yates, David ^a   Nahum, Erich ^b   Kurose, Jim ^c   Shenoy, Prashant ^c  

^a BENTLEY COLLEGE   (United States)

^b IBM T J WATSON RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^c Biologically Inspired Neural and Dynamical Systems Laboratory   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS; APPLICATIONS.; BENEFITS AND COSTS; CACHING DATA; COST SAVINGS; DATA ACCURACY; DATA QUALITY; FIELD DATA; INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES; MULTIPLE USERS; NEGATIVE IMPACTS; PERVASIVE COMPUTING; PERVASIVE SENSING; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; QUERY COSTS; QUERY RATE; SENSING SYSTEMS; SENSOR DATA; SINGLE SENSORS; SYSTEM DELAY; UPPER BOUNDS; USER QUERIES; WIN-WIN;

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; COMPUTER SYSTEMS;

SENSORS;

EID: 49149085045     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/PERCOM.2008.117     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. C. M. Bishop. Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995.
2. A. Boulis, S. Ganeriwal, and M. B. Srivastava. Aggregation in sensor networks: an energy-accuracy tradeoff. In IEEE Workshop on Sensor Network Protocols and Applications (SNPA), May 2003.
3. J. S. Bridle. Probabilistic interpretation of feed-forward classification network outputs, with relationships to statistical pattern recognition. Neurocomputing: Algorithms, Architecture and Applications, 6, 1990.
4. A. Demers, J. Gehrke, R. Rajaraman, N. Trigoni, and Y. Yao. The Cougar project: a work-in-progress report. ACM SIGMOD Record, 32(4):53-59, Dec. 2003.
5. A. Deshpande, C. Guestrin, S. R. Madden, J. M. Hellerstein, and W. Hong. Model-driven data acquisition in sensor networks. In International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB), pages 588-599, Toronto, Aug. 2004. Morgan Kaufmann.
6. P. B. Gibbons, B. Karp, Y. Ke, S. Nath, and S. Seshan. IrisNet: An architecture for a world-wide sensor web. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 2(4):22-33, Oct. 2003.
7. J. Han and M. Kamber. Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, California, USA, 2000.
8. C. Intanagonwiwat, R. Govindan, D. Estrin, J. Heidemann, and F. Silva. Directed diffusion for wireless sensor networking. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 11(1):2-16, Feb. 2003.
9. K. Jamieson, H. Balakrishnan, and Y. C. Tay. Sift: a MAC protocol for event-driven wireless sensor networks. Technical Report 894, Laboratory for Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA, May 2003.
10. A. Jindal and K. Psounis. Modeling spatially correlated data in sensor networks. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks, 2(4):466-499, Nov. 2006.
11. C. Lu, B. M. Blum, T. F. Abdelzaher, J. A. Stankovic, and T. He. RAP: a real-time communication architecture for large-scale wireless sensor networks. In IEEE Real-Time and Embedded Technology and Applications Symposium, pages 55-66, Sept. 2002.
12. S. Madden, M. J. Franklin, J. M. Hellerstein, and W. Hong. TinyDB: an acquisitional query processing system for sensor networks. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 30(1):122-173, Mar. 2005.
13. V. Raghunathan, C. Schurgers, S. Park, and M. B. Srivastava. Energy-aware wireless microsensor networks. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 19(2):40-50, Mar. 2002.
14. C. Rodriguez. A computational environment for data preprocessing in supervised classifications. Master's thesis, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez, July 2004.
15. H. D. Schwetman. Introduction to process-oriented simulation and CSIM. In Proceedings of the ACM Winter Simulation Conference, pages 154-157, Dec. 1990.
16. H. D. Schwetman. CSIM 19: A powerful tool for building systems models. In Proceedings of the ACM Winter Simulation Conference, Dec. 2001.
17. M. A. Sharaf, J. Beaver, A. Labrinidis, and P. K. Chrysanthis. Balancing energy efficiency and quality of aggregate data in sensor networks. The VLDB Journal, 13(4):384-403, 2004.
18. S.-H. Son, M. Chiang, S. R. Kulkarni, and S. C. Schwartz. The value of clustering in distributed estimation for sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Wireless Networks, Communications, and Mobile Computing (Wireless Com), June 2005.
19. S. Tilak, N. B. Abu-Ghazaleh, and W. Heinzelman. Infrastructure tradeoffs for sensor networks. In Proceedings of First ACM International Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks & Applications, pages 49-58, Sept. 2002.
20. C.-Y. Wan, S. B. Eisenman, and A. T. Campbell. Coda: congestion detection and avoidance in sensor networks. In ACM SenSys Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pages 266-279, Nov. 2003.
21. D. Yates, E. Nahum, J. Kurose, and P. Shenoy. Data quality and query cost in wireless sensor networks. In Third IEEE International Workshop on Sensor Networks and Systems for Pervasive Computing, pages 272-278, Mar. 2007.
22. D. J. Yates. Scalable Data Delivery for Networked Servers and Wireless Sensor Networks. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, Feb. 2006.
23. Y. Yu, B. Krishnamachari, and V. K. Prasanna. Energy-latency tradeoffs for data gathering in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Communications (IEEE Infocom), Mar. 2004.
24. J. Zhao and R. Govindan. Understanding packet delivery performance in dense wireless sensor networks. In ACM SenSys Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pages 1-13, Nov. 2003.