Erratum: CsI-detector-based dual-exposure dual energy in chest radiography for lung nodule detection: Results of an international multicenter trial (Eur Radiol (2008) vol. 18(9) (1831-1839) 10.1007/s00330-008-0945-6);CsI-detector-based dual-exposure dual energy in chest radiography for lung nodule detection: Results of an international multicenter trial

European Radiology

Volumn 18, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 1831-1839

  Rühl, Ricarda ^a   Wozniak, Magdalena M ^b   Werk, Michael ^c   Laurent, François ^d   Mager, Georg ^e   Montaudon, Michel ^d   Pattermann, Andreas ^f   Scherrer, Antoine ^g   Tasu, Jean Pierre ^h   Pech, Maciej ⁱ   Ricke, Jens ⁱ  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MAGDEBURG   (Germany)

^b Dzieciecy Szpital Kliniczny   (Poland)

^c CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^d HAUT LÉVÊQUE HOSPITAL   (France)

^e Wilhelminenspital ^*

^f WILHELMINEN HOSPITAL   (Austria)

^g FOCH HOSPITAL   (France)

^h POITIERS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

ⁱ Klinik fur Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin   (Germany)

Author keywords

Digital radiography; Dual energy; Lung; Pulmonary nodules; Thoracic imaging

Indexed keywords

CESIUM IODIDE; CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIGITAL IMAGING; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION; EUROPE; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LUNG CALCIFICATION; LUNG CANCER; LUNG NODULE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DETECTION; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RATING SCALE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY; TUMOR VOLUME;

EID: 49049121586     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-1160-1     Document Type: Erratum

References (24)

1. Diederich S, Hansen J, Wormanns D (2005) Resolving small pulmonary nodules: CT features. Eur Radiol 15(10):2064-2069
2. Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Naidich DP, McCauley DI, McGuinness G, Libby DM et al (2004) CT screening for lung cancer: Suspiciousness of nodules according to size on baseline scans. Radiology 231(1):164-168
3. Fischbach F, Freund T, Rottgen R, Engert U, Felix R, Ricke J (2003) Dual-energy chest radiography with a flat-panel digital detector: revealing calcified chest abnormalities. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181(6):1519-1524
4. Siegelman SS, Khouri NF, Leo FP, Fishman EK, Braverman RM, Zerhouni EA (1986) Solitary pulmonary nodules: CT assessment. Radiology 160(2):307-312
5. Avinash GB, Jabri KN, Uppaluri R, Rader A, Fischbach F, Ricke J, Teichgraeber U (2002) Effective dose reduction in dual-energy flat panel X-ray imaging: Technique and clinical evaluation. Proc SPIE 4684:1048-1059
6. Fischbach F, Ricke J, Freund T, Werk M, Spors B, Baumann C et al (2002) Flat panel digital radiography compared with storage phosphor computed radiography: Assessment of dose versus image quality in phantom studies. Invest Radiol 37(11):609-614
7. Zweig MH, Campbell G (1993) Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: A fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem 39(4):561-577
8. Jemal A, Chu KC, Tarone RE (2001) Recent trends in lung cancer mortality in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst 93(4):277-283
9. Ost D, Fein A (2000) Evaluation and management of the solitary pulmonary nodule. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 162(3 Pt 1):782-787
10. Shiraishi J, Katsuragawa S, Ikezoe J, Matsumoto T, Kobayashi T, Komatsu K et al (2000) Development of a digital image database for chest radiographs with and without a lung nodule: Receiver operating characteristic analysis of radiologists' detection of pulmonary nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174(1):71-74
11. Libby DM, Smith JP, Altorki NK, Pasmantier MW, Yankelevitz D, Henschke CI (2004) Managing the small pulmonary nodule discovered by CT. Chest 125(4):1522-1529
12. Furuya K, Murayama S, Soeda H, Murakami J, Ichinose Y, Yabuuchi H et al (1999) New classification of small pulmonary nodules by margin characteristics on high-resolution CT. Acta Radiol 40(5):496-504
13. Samei E, Flynn MJ, Eyler WR (1999) Detection of subtle lung nodules: relative influence of quantum and anatomic noise on chest radiographs. Radiology 213(3):727-734
14. Kundel HL (1981) Predictive value and threshold detectability of lung tumors. Radiology 139(1):25-29
15. Kakeda S, Moriya J, Sato H, Aoki T, Watanabe H, Nakata H et al (2004) Improved detection of lung nodules on chest radiographs using a commercial computer-aided diagnosis system. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182(2):505-510
16. Ricke J, Fischbach F, Freund T, Teichgraber U, Hanninen EL, Rottgen R et al (2003) Clinical results of CsI-detector-based dual-exposure dual energy in chest radiography. Eur Radiol 13(12):2577-2582
17. Tsukuda S, Heshiki A, Katsuragawa S, Li Q, MacMahon H, Doi K (2002) Detection of lung nodules on digital chest radiographs: Potential usefulness of a new contralateral subtraction technique. Radiology 223(1):199-203
18. Whitman GJ, Niklason LT, Pandit M, Oliver LC, Atkins EH, Kinnard O et al (2002) Dual-energy digital subtraction chest radiography: Technical considerations. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 31(2):48-62
19. Ho JT, Kruger RA, Sorenson JA (1989) Comparison of dual and single exposure techniques in dual-energy chest radiography. Med Phys 16(2):202-208
20. Shaw CC, Gur D (1992) Comparison of three different techniques for dual-energy subtraction imaging in digital radiography: A signal-to-noise analysis. J Digit Imaging 5(4):262-270
21. Gauntt DM, Barnes GT (1994) X-ray tube potential, filtration, and detector considerations in dual-energy chest radiography. Med Phys 21(2):203-218
22. Oestmann JW, Greene R, Rhea JT, Rosenthal H, Koenker RM, Tillotson CL et al (1989) "Single-exposure" dual energy digital radiography in the detection of pulmonary nodules and calcifications. Invest Radiol 24(7):517-521
23. Awai K, Komi M, Hori S (2001) Selenium-based digital radiography versus high-resolution storage phosphor radiography in the detection of solitary pulmonary nodules without calcification: Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177(5):1141-1144
24. Biederer J, Gottwald T, Bolte H, Riedel C, Freitag S, Van Metter R et al (2007) Pulmonary nodule detection with digital projection radiography: an ex-vivo study on increased latitude post-processing. Eur Radiol 17(4):1089-1100