Imaging as a quantitative science

Radiology

Volumn 248, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 328-332

  Sullivan, Daniel C ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE DIAGNOSIS; RADIOLOGIST; REVIEW; VALIDATION PROCESS; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; IMAGE PROCESSING; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; RADIOLOGY;

DECISION MAKING; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE REFORM; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; RADIOLOGY;

EID: 49049118515     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2482080242     Document Type: Review

References (7)

1. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence-based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ 1996;312(7023):71-72.
2. Paik S. Development and clinical utility of a 21-gene recurrence score prognostic assay in patients with early breast cancer treated with tamoxifen. Oncologist 2007;12(6):631-635.
3. Mook S, Van't Veer LJ, Rutgers EJ, Piccart-Gebhart MJ, Cardoso F. Individualization of therapy using Mammaprint: from development to the MINDACT Trial. Cancer Genomics Proteomics 2007;4(3):147-155.
4. Boone JM. Radiological interpretation 2020: toward quantitative image assessment. Med Phys 2007;34(11):4173-4179.
5. Birkelo CC, Chamberlain WE, Phelps PS, et al. Tuberculosis case finding: a comparison of the effectiveness of various roentgenographic and photofluorographic methods. JAMA 1947;133:359-366.
6. Beam CA, Layde PM, Sullivan DC. Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists: findings from a national sample. Arch Intern Med 1996;156(2):209-213.
7. Shukla-Dave A, Hricak H, Kattan MW, et al. The utility of magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy for predicting insignificant prostate cancer: an initial analysis. BJU Int 2007;99(4):786-793.