Land use and forestry based CDM in scientific peer-reviewed literature pre-and post-COP 9 in Milan

International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 249-274

  Palm, Matilda ^a   Ostwald, Madelene ^a   Reilly, John ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

CDM; COP; Forestry; Land use change; Literature study; Negotiations; Policy; Research

Indexed keywords

CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM; FORESTRY; FORESTRY POLICY; LAND USE; LAND USE CHANGE; POLICY MAKING;

EURASIA; EUROPE; ITALY; LOMBARDY; MILAN; MILANO [LOMBARDY]; SOUTHERN EUROPE;

EID: 49049112829     PISSN: 15679764     EISSN: 15731553     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10784-008-9074-6     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Berlin, D. (2007). Green power generators-how the political stakes of global environmental conventions make some NGOs more fit for power making than others. Dissertation, Göteborg University.
2. Dessai, S., Schipper, L. F., Corbera, E., Kjellen, B., Gutierrez, M., & Haxeltine, A. (2005). Challenges and outcomes at the ninth session of the conference of the parties to the United Nations framework convention on climate change. International Environmental Agreements, 5, 105-124.
3. Fogel, C. (2005). Biotic carbon sequestration and the Kyoto rotocol: The construction of global knowledge by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. International Environmental Agreements, 5, 191-210.
4. IPCC. (2000). Land use, land-use change, and forestry. A special report of the IPCC. In R. T. Watson, I. R. Noble, B. Bolin, N. H. Ravindranath, D. J. Verardo, & D. J. Dokken (Eds.). Camebridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
5. IPCC. (2003). Good practice guidance for land use, land use and forestry. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change National Greenhouse Inventories Programme, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), Japan.
6. Jasanoff, S., & Wynne, B. (1998). Science and decision making. In S. Rayner, E. L. Malone (Eds.), Human choices and climate change Vol. 1, The Societal Framework (pp. 1-87). Washington: Battelle Press.
7. Jordan, A., & O'Riordan, T. (1998). Institutions for global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 8, 171-175.
8. Jung, M. (2005). The role of forestry projects in the clean development mechanism. Environmental Science and Policy, 8, 87-104.
9. Kothari, A., Birch, S., & Charles, C. (2005). "Interaction" and research utilization in health policies and programs: Does it work? Health Policy, 71, 117-125.
10. Lidskog, R., & Sundqvist, G. (2002). The role of science in environmental regimes: The case of LRTAP. European Journal of International Relations, 8, 177-101.
11. Leaf, D. (2001). Managing global atmospheric change: A U.S. policy perspective. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 7, 1211-1226.
12. Oreskes, N. (2004). Behind the ivory tower-the scientific consensus on climate change. Science, 306, 1686.
13. Sathaye, J. A., Makundi, W. R., Andrasko, K., Boer R., Ravindranath, N. H., Sudha, P., Rao, S., Lasco, R., Pulhin, F., Masera, O., Ceron, A., Ordones, J., Deying, X., Zhang, X., & Zuomin, S. (2001). Carbon mitigation potential and costs of forestry options in Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Mexico, the Philippines and Tanzania. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 6, 185-211.
14. Sitch, S., Brovkin, V., von Bloh, W., van Vuuren, D., Eickhout, B., & Ganopolski, A. (2005). Impacts of future land cover changes on atmospheric CO2 and climate. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 19, GB2013.
15. Skodvin, T. (1999). Science-policy interaction in the global greenhouse institutional design and institutional performance in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Working paper 1999:3 Cicero.
16. UNFCCC Decision 11/CP.7. (2001). Land use, land-use change and forestry. Retrieved November 20, 2006, from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/cop7/13a01. pdf#page=54.
17. UNFCCC Decision 1/CP.8. (2002). Delhi ministerial declaration on climate change and sustainable development. Retrieved November 20, 2006, from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/cop8/07a01.pdf#page=3.
18. UNFCCC Decision 19/CP.9. (2003). Modalities and procedures for afforestation and reforestation project activities under the clean development mechanism in the first commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol. Retrieved November 20, 2006, from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/cop10/10a02.pdf#page=26.
19. UNFCCC Decision 14/CP.10. (2004). Simplified modalities and procedures for small-scale afforestation and reforestation project activities under the clean development mechanism in the first commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol and measures to facilitate their implementation. Retrieved November 20, 2006, from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/cop10/10a02.pdf#page=26.
20. UNFCCC Decision 15/CP.10. (2004). Good practice guidance for land use, land-use change and forestry activities under Article 3, Paragraphs 3 and 4, of the Kyoto Protocol. Retrieved November 20, 2006, from http://unfccc.int/ resource/docs/cop10/10a02.pdf#page=41.
21. UNFCCC. (2004). Simplified modalities and procedures for small-scale afforestation and reforestation project activities under the clean development mechanism, technical paper. Retrieved November 20, 2006, from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/tp/tp0402.pdf.