The geography of private forests that support at-risk species in the conterminous United States

Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment

Volumn 6, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 301-307

  Robles, Marcos D ^a   Flather, Curtis H ^b   Stein, Susan M ^c   Nelson, Mark D ^c   Cutko, Andrew ^a  

^a NATURESERVE   (United States)

^b ROCKY MOUNTAIN RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

^c USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION STATUS; ENDANGERED SPECIES; LAND USE CHANGE; PRIVATE LAND; RED LIST; WATERSHED;

MIDWEST; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 49049097108     PISSN: 15409295     EISSN: 15409309     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/070106     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Chaplin SL, Gerrard RA, Watson HM, et al. 2000. The geography of imperilment: targeting conservation toward critical biodiversity areas. In: Stein BA, Kutner LS, and Adams JS (Eds). Precious heritage: the status of biodiversity in the United States. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
2. Conover WJ. 1971. Practical nonparametric statistics. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
3. Crumpacker DW, Hodge SW, Friedley D, et al. 1988. A preliminary assessment of the status of major terrestrial and wetland ecosystems on federal and Indian lands in the United States. Conserv Biol 2: 103-15.
4. DellaSala DA, Staus NL, Strittholt JR, et al. 2001. An updated protected areas database for the United States and Canada. Nat Area J 21: 124-35.
5. Findley CS and Houlahan J. 1997. Anthropogenic correlates of species richness in southeastern Ontario wetlands. Conserv Biol 11: 1000-09.
6. Flather CH, Knowles MS, and Kendall IA. 1998. Threatened and endangered species geography. BioScience 48: 365-76.
7. Groves CR, Kutner LS, Stoms DM, et al. 2000. Owning up to our responsibilities: who owns lands important to biodiversity? In: Stein BA, Kutner LS, and Adams JS (Eds). Precious heritage: the status of biodiversity in the United States. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
8. Hagan JM, Irland LC, and Whitman AA. 2005. Changing timberland ownership in the Northern Forest and implications for biodiversity. Brunswick, ME: Manomet Center for Conservation Sciences. Report # MCCS-FCP-2005-1.
9. Hilty J and Merenlender AM. 2003. Studying biodiversity on private lands. Conserv Biol 17: 132-37.
10. Kautz RS and Cox JA. 2001. Strategic habitats for biodiversity conservation in Florida. Conserv Biol 15: 55-77.
11. Knight RL. 1999. Private lands: the neglected geography. Conserv Biol 13: 223-24.
12. Maehr DS. 1990. The Florida panther and private lands. Conserv Biol 4: 167-70.
13. Mendell, B, Newman D, Wear D, et al. 2005. Under new management: a case study of southern timberland ownership changes. Asheville, NC: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. Final Report.
14. Morrison JL and Humphrey SR. 2001. Conservation value of private lands for crested caracaras in Florida. Conserv Biol 15: 675-85.
15. NRC (National Research Council). 2000. Ecological indicators for the nation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
16. NatureServe. 2004. Biotics database, version 4. NatureServe Central Databases. Arlington, VA: NatureServe.
17. Nelson MD, McRoberts RE, and Lessard VC. 2005. Comparison of US forest land area estimates from Forest Inventory and Analysis, National Resources Inventory, and four satellite image-derived land cover datasets. In: McRoberts RE, Reams GA, Van Deusen PC, et al. (Eds). Proceedings of the 5th Annual Forest Inventory and Analysis Symposium; 18-20 Nov 2003; New Orleans, LA. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Gen Tech Rep WO-69.
18. Reuters. 2006. International Paper to sell most of its forestland. New York Times. April 5: Sect C: 5.
19. Ratner S, Lande R, and Roper B. 1997. Population viability analysis of spring chinook salmon in the South Umpqua River, Oregon. Conserv Biol 11: 879-89.
20. Riley SPD, Sauvajot RM, Fuller TK, et al. 2003. Effects of urbanization and habitat fragmentation on bobcats and coyotes in southern California. Conserv Biol 12: 566-76.
21. SAS Institute. 2003. The SAS system for windows, version 9.1. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
22. Scott JM, Davis FW, McGhie RG, et al. 2001. Nature reserves: do they capture the full range of America's biological diversity? Ecol Appl 11: 999-1007.
23. Stein SM, McRoberts RE, Alig RJ, et al. 2005. Forests on the edge: housing development on America's private forests. Portland, OR: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. Gen Tech Rep PNW-GTR-636.
24. Stein SM, McRoberts RE, Nelson MD, et al. 2006. Forests on the edge: a GIS-based approach to projecting housing development on private forests. In: Aguirre-Bravo C, Pellicane PJ, Burns DP, et al. (Eds). Proceedings of the monitoring science and technology symposium: unifying knowledge for sustainability in the western hemisphere. 20-24 Sep 2004; Denver, CO. Fort Collins, CO: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. Gen Tech Rep RMRS-P-42CD.
25. Stein BA and FW Davis. 2000. Discovering life in America: tools and techniques of biodiversity inventory. In: Stein BA, Kutner LS, and Adams JS (Eds). Precious heritage: the status of biodiversity in the United States. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
26. US Census Bureau. 2001. Census 2000 summary file 1 technical documentation. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.
27. USGS (US Geological Survey). 2001. Hydrologic units boundaries of the United States. Washington, DC: USGS.
28. Vogelmann JE, Howard SM, Yang L, et al. 2001. Completion of the 1990s National Land Cover Dataset for the conterminous United States from Landsat Thematic Mapper data and ancillary data sources. Photogramm Eng Rens S 67: 650-62.
29. Woodard C. 2006. The sale of the century. Nature Conserv 56: 20-25.