Risk assessment in social defence: Preliminary factorial analysis of the SORAG « Sex Offender Recidivism Appraisal Guide » (SORAG) and the Static-99;Évaluation du risque de récidive en Belgique francophone : données préliminaires d'analyse factorielle de la « Sex Offender Recidivism Appraisal Guide » (SORAG) et de la Statique-99

Annales Medico-Psychologiques

Volumn 166, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 575-579

  Pham, T H ^a,b   Ducro, C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MONS   (Belgium)

^b Centre de Recherche en Défense Sociale CRDS   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Factorial analysis; Internees; Risk assessment; Social defence; SORAG; Statique 99

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR; DEMOGRAPHY; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; HUMAN; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOPATHY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEX OFFENDER RECIDIVISM APPRAISAL GUIDE; SEXUAL CRIME; VICTIM;

EID: 49049096464     PISSN: 00034487     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amp.2008.06.001     Document Type: Note

References (16)

1. Barbaree H.E., Seto M.C., Langton C.M., and Peacock E.J. Evaluating the predictive accuracy of six risk assessment instruments for adult sex offenders. Crim Just Behav 28 (2001) 490-521
2. Barbaree H.E., Langton C.M., and Peacock E.J. The factor structure of Static-99 actuarial items: Its relation to prediction. Sex Abuse (a) 18 (2006) 207-226
3. Barbaree H.E., Langton C.M., and Peacock E.J. Different actuarial risk measures produce different risk rankings for sexual offenders. Sex Abuse (b) 18 (2006) 23-440
4. Borum R. Improving the clinical practice of violence risk assessment. Am Psychol 51 (1996) 945-956
5. Cohen J. Quantitative methods in psychology - a power primer. Psychol Bull 112 (1992) 155-159
6. Doren D. Toward a multidimensional model for sexual recidivism. J Interpers Viol 19 (2004) 835-856
7. Ducro C., and Pham H.T. Evaluation of the SORAG and Static-99 on Belgian sex offenders committed to a forensic facility. Sex Abuse 18 (2006) 15-26
8. Hanson RK, Thornton D. Statique-99 : une amélioration des évaluations actuarielles du risque chez les agresseurs sexuels. Rapport pour spécialistes n°1999-02. Ottawa : ministère du Solliciteur général du Canada. 1999.
9. Hare R.D. Manual for the hare psychopathy checklist-revised (2003), Multi-Health Systems, Toronto
10. Marghem B, Pham HT, Ducro C, Hennin B. Validité prédictive de la Statique-99 auprès d'une population carcérale belge. Congrès International Francophone sur l'Agression Sexuelle (CIFAS), Paris, France ; septembre 2007.
11. McGrath RJ. Conducting sexual offender risk assessments. The Second International Conference Towards a safer society, Edinburgh, Scotland; september 2004.
12. Quinsey V.L., Lalumière M.L., Rice M.E., and Harris G.T. Predicting sexual offenses. In: Campbell J.C. (Ed). Assessing dangerousness: violence by sexual offenders, batterers, and child abusers (1995), Sage, Thousand Oakes CA 114-137
13. Quinsey VL, Harris GT, Rice ME, Cormier CA. Violent offenders. Appraising and managing risk. American Psychological Association ed. 2006.
14. Robert C.F., Doren D.M., and Thornton D. Dimensions associated with assessments of sex offender recidivism risk. Crim Just Behav 29 (2002) 569-589
15. Rogers R. The uncritical acceptance of risk assessment in forensic practice. Law Human Behav 24 (2000) 595-605
16. Sjostedt G., and Langström N. Assessment of risk for criminal recidivism among rapist: a comparison of four different measures. Psychol Crime Law 8 (2002) 25-40