Off-site teleradiology: The pros

Radiology

Volumn 248, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 337-341

  Bradley Jr , William G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; IMAGE QUALITY; NOTE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIODIAGNOSIS; RADIOLOGIST; TELECONSULTATION; TELERADIOLOGY; UNITED STATES; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; HUMAN; INTERNET; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE;

HUMANS; INTERNET; OUTSOURCED SERVICES; PHYSICIAN'S ROLE; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; TELERADIOLOGY;

EID: 49049094263     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2482080569     Document Type: Note

References (7)

1. Wilson AJ. Is teleradiology the solution to after-hours emergency radiology coverage? RadioGraphics 1996;16(4):939-942.
2. Franken EA. Teleradiology moving into the mainstream. Telemed Today 1996;4(1):14-15.
3. DeCorato DR, Kagetsu NJ, Ablow RC. Off-hours interpretation of radiologic images of patients admitted to the emergency department: efficacy of teleradiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;165(5):1293-1296.
4. Bradley WG. Use of a nighthawk service in an academic radiology department. J Am Coll Radiol 2007;4(10):675-677.
5. Borgstede JP. ACR presidential oration: four foundations for our future. J Am Coll Radiol 2007;4(12):875-878.
6. Kanal E, Barkovich AJ, Bell C, et al. ACR guidance document for safe MR practices: 2007. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188(6):1447-1474.
7. Friedman TL. The world is flat: a brief history of the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Farrar-Strauss, 2005.