Comparison of the reproducibility of quantitative cardiac left ventricular assessments in healthy volunteers using different MRI scanners: A multicenter simulation

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 359-365

  Gandy, Stephen J ^a   Waugh, Shelley A ^a   Nicholas, R Stephen ^a   Simpson, Helen J ^b   Milne, Wendy ^a   Houston, J Graeme ^a  

^a NINEWELLS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cardiac MRI; Ejection fraction; Left ventricular mass; Multicenter; Reproducibility

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEART EJECTION FRACTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE MASS; HEART MUSCLE; HUMAN; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; INTRARATER RELIABILITY; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MODEL; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; SIMULATION; VOLUNTEER;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STROKE VOLUME; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 49049091351     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21401     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Lyne JC, Penneil DJ. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the quantitative assessment of left ventricular mass, volumes and contractile function. Coron Artery Dis 2005;16:337-343.
2. Myerson SG, Bellenger NG, Penneil DJ. Assessment of left ventricular mass by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Hypertension 2002;39:750-755.
3. Grothues F, Smith G, Moon JCC, et al. Comparison of interstudy reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance with two-dimensional echocardiography in normal subjects and in patients with heart failure or left ventricular hypertrophy. Am J Cardiol 2002;90:29-34.
4. Alfakih K, Bloomer T, Bainbridge S et al. A comparison of left ventricular mass between two-dimensional echocardiography, using fundamental and tissue harmonic imaging, and cardiac MRI in patients with hypertension. Eur J Radiol 2004;52:103-109.
5. Bellenger NG, Davies LC, Francis JM, Coats AJS, Pennell DJ. Reduction in sample size for studies of remodelling in heart failure by the use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2000;2:271-278.
6. Thorley PJ, Plein S, Bloomer TN, Ridgway JP, Sivananthan UM. Comparison of 99mTc tetrofosmin gated SPECT measurements of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction with MRI over a wide range of values. Nucl Med Commun 2003;24:763-769.
7. Yamaoka O, Yabe T, Okada M, et al. Evaluation of left ventricular mass; comparison of ultrafast computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and contrast left ventriculography. Am Heart J 1993;126:1372-1379.
8. Francois CJ, Fieno DS, Shors SM, Finn JP. Left ventricular mass: manual and automatic segmentation of TruFISP and FLASH Cine MR images in dogs and pigs. Radiology 2004;230:389-395.
9. Katz J, Milliken MC, Stray-Gundersen J, et al. Estimation of human myocardial mass with MR imaging. Radiology 1988;169:495-498.
10. Bottini PB, Carr AA, Prisant LM, Flickinger FW, Allison JD, Gottdiener JS. Magnetic resonance imaging compared to echocardiography to assess left ventricular mass in the hypertensive patient. J Hypertens 1995;8:221-228.
11. Sechtem U, Pflugfelder PW, Gould RG, Cassidy MM, Higgins CB. Measurement of right and left ventricular volumes in healthy individuals with cine MR imaging. Radiology 1987;163:697-702.
12. Cain PA, Ahl R, Hedstrom E et al. Physiological determinants of the variation in left ventricular mass from early adolescence to late adulthood in healthy subjects. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2005;25:332-339.
13. Hudsmith LE, Petersen SE, Tyler DJ, et al. Determination of cardiac volumes and mass with FLASH and SSFP cine sequences at 1.5 vs. 3 Tesla: a validation study. J Magon Reson Imaging 2006;24:312-318.
14. Barkhaussen J, Ruehm SG, Goyen M, Buck T, Laub G, Debatin JF. MR evaluation of ventricular function: true fast imaging with steady-state precession versus fast low-angle shot cine MR imaging: feasibility study. Radiology 2001;219:264-269.
15. Hori Y, Yamada N, Higashi M, Hirai N, Nakatani S. Rapid evaluation of right and left ventricular function and mass using real-time true-FISP cine MR imaging without breath-hold: comparison with segmented true-FISP cine MR imaging with breath-hold. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2003;5:439-450.
16. Alfakih K, Reid S, Jones T, Sivananthan M. Assessment of ventricular function and mass by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 2004;14:1813-1822.
17. Moon JCC, Lorenz CH, Francis JM, Smith GC, Pennell DJ. Breathhold FLASH and FISP cardiovascular MR imaging: left ventricular volume differences and reproducibility. Radiology 2002;223:789-797.
18. Waiter GD, McKiddie FI, Redpath TW, Semple SIK, Trent RJ. Determination of normal regional left ventricular function from cine-MR images using a semi-automated edge detection method. Magn Reson Imaging 1999;17:99-107.
19. Danilouchkine MG, Westenberg JJM, Reiber JHC, Lelieveeldt PF. Automated short-axis cardiac magnetic resonance image acquisitions. Accuracy of left ventricular dimension measurements in normal subjects and patients. Invest Radiol 2004;39:747-755.
20. van der Geest RJ, Lelieveldt BPF, Reiber JHC. Quantification of global and regional ventricular function in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2000;11:348-358.
21. Motooka M, Matsuda T, Kida M, et al. Single breath-hold left ventricular volume measurement by 0.3-sec turbo fast low-angle shot MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172:1645-1649.
22. Stewart GA, Mark PB, Johnston N, et al. Determinants of hypertension and left ventricular function in end stage renal failure: a pilot study using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2004;24:387-393.
23. Semelka RC, Tomei E, Wagner S, et al. Normal left ventricular dimensions and function: interstudy reproducibility of measurements with cine MR imaging. Radiology 1990;174:763-768.
24. Grothues F, Moon JC, Bellenger NG, Smith GS, Klein HU, Pennell DJ. Interstudy reproducibility of right ventricular volumes, function and mass with cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Am Heart J 2004;147:218-223.
25. Pattynama PMT, Lamb HJ, van der Velde E, van der Wall E, de Roos A. Left ventricular measurement with cine and spin-echo MR Imaging: a study of reproducibility with variance component analysis. Radiology 1993;187:261-268.
26. Plein S, Bloomer TN, Ridgway JP, Jones TR, Bainbridge GJ, Sivananthan MU. Steady-state free precession magnetic resonance imaging of the heart: comparison with segmented k-space gradient-echo imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;14:230-236.
27. Steen H, Nasir K, Flynn E, et al. Is magnetic resonance imaging the 'reference standard' for cardiac functional assessment? Factors influencing measurement of left ventricular mass and volumes. Clin Res Cardiol 2007;96:743-751.
28. Papavassiliu T, Kuhl HP, Schroder M, et al. Effect of endocardial trabeculae on left ventricular measurements and measurement reproducibility at cardiovascular MR imaging. Radiology 2005;236:57-64.