|
|
Volumn 248, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 703-
|
|
DMIST results: Technologic or observer variability?
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
BREAST CANCER;
CANCER DIAGNOSIS;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY;
HUMAN;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
LETTER;
MAMMOGRAPHY;
OBSERVER VARIATION;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
SCREEN FILM MAMMOGRAPHY;
ADULT;
AGE DISTRIBUTION;
AGED;
BREAST TUMOR;
CANADA;
FEMALE;
IMAGE QUALITY;
MASS SCREENING;
MIDDLE AGED;
NOTE;
RADIOGRAPHY;
REPRODUCIBILITY;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
STATISTICS;
UNITED STATES;
X RAY FILM;
ADULT;
AGE DISTRIBUTION;
AGED;
AGED, 80 AND OVER;
BREAST NEOPLASMS;
CANADA;
CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
MAMMOGRAPHY;
MASS SCREENING;
MIDDLE AGED;
RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
UNITED STATES;
X-RAY FILM;
|
|
EID: 49049086337
PISSN: 00338419
EISSN: 15271315
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2482080378 Document Type: Letter |
|
Times cited : (5)
|
|
References (3)
|
