Wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized treatment

Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

Volumn 34, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 1229-1230

  Cheng, Arthur C K ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; EYE DISEASE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KERATOMILEUSIS; LETTER; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; WAVEFRONT GUIDED KERATOMILEUSIS; WAVEFRONT OPTIMIZED KERATOMILEUSIS;

CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CORNEAL STROMA; HUMANS; KERATOMILEUSIS, LASER IN SITU; MYOPIA; SURGICAL FLAPS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 48949118750     PISSN: 08863350     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.04.035     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. Padmanabhan P., Mrochen M., Basuthkar S., Viswanathan D., and Joseph R. Wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis: Contralateral comparative study. J Cataract Refract Surg 34 (2008) 389-397
2. Mrochen M., Donitzky C., Wüllner C., and Löffler J. Wavefront-optimized ablation profiles: theoretical background. J Cataract Refract Surg 30 (2004) 775-785
3. Tran D.B., and Shah V. Higher order aberrations comparison in fellow eyes following IntraLase LASIK with WaveLight Allegretto and CustomCornea LADARvision4000 systems. J Refract Surg 22 (2006) S961-S964
4. Brint S.F. Higher order aberrations after LASIK for myopia with Alcon and WaveLight lasers: a prospective randomized trial. J Refract Surg 21 (2005) S799-S803