Sparse gammatone signal model optimized for English speech does not match the human auditory filters

Brain Research

Volumn 1220, Issue , 2008, Pages 224-233

  Strahl, Stefan ^a   Mertins, Alfred ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OLDENBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LÜBECK   (Germany)

Author keywords

Efficient coding hypothesis; Gammatone; Matching pursuit; Sparse coding

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; AUDITORY FILTER; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; AUDITORY SYSTEM FUNCTION; GAMMATONE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SPEECH ANALYSIS; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NOISE; PSYCHOACOUSTICS; REACTION TIME; SPEECH;

EID: 48949118515     PISSN: 00068993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.11.059     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Aharon M., Elad M., and Bruckstein A. K-SVD: an algorithm for designing of overcomplete dictionaries for sparse representation. IEEE Trans. Signal Proc. 54 11 (2006) 4311-4322
2. Ambikairajah E., Epps J., and Lin L. Wideband speech and audio coding using gammatone filter banks. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP01) (2001)
3. Attwell D., and Laughlin S. An energy budget for signaling in the grey matter of the brain. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 21 10 (2001) 1133-1145
4. Barlow H. Possible principles underlying the transformation of sensory messages. In: Rosenbluth W. (Ed). Sensory Communication (1961), MIT Press, Cambridge 217-234
5. Bell A., and Sejnowski T. Learning the higher order structure of a natural sound. Netw. Comput. Neural Syst. 7 2 (1996) 261-266
6. Brandenburg K., Kunz O., and Sugiyama A. MPEG-4 natural audio coding. Signal Process., Image Commun. 15 4-5 (2000) 423-444
7. Chen, S. S., 1995. Basis Pursuit. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University.
8. Chen S.S., Donoho D.L., and Saunders M.A. Atomic decomposition by basis pursuit. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 20 1 (1998) 33-61
9. Chi T., Ru P., and Shamma S. Multiresolution spectrotemporal analysis of complex sounds. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118 2 (2005) 887-906
10. Dau T., Püschel D., and Kohlrausch A. A quantitative model of the effective signal processing in the auditory system: I. Model structure. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99 6 (1996) 3615-3622
11. Dau T., Püschel D., and Kohlrausch A. A quantitative model of the effective signal processing in the auditory system: II. Simulations and measurements. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99 6 (1996) 3623-3631
12. Davies M., and Daudet L. Sparse audio representations using the MCLT. Signal Proc. 86 3 (2006) 457-470
13. Davis, G., 1994. Adaptive Nonlinear Approximations. Ph.D. thesis, New York University.
14. Donoho D., and Tsaig Y. Recent advances in sparsity-driven signal recovery. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP05) (2005)
15. Donoho D., Elad M., and Temlyakov V. Stable recovery of sparse overcomplete representations in the presence of noise. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 52 1 (2006) 6-18
16. European Broadcasting Union. Sound quality assessment material recordings for subjective tests (1988). http://sound.media.mit.edu/mpeg4/audio/sqam/ URL http://sound.media.mit.edu/mpeg4/audio/sqam/
17. Feldbauer C., Kubin G., and Kleijn W. Anthropomorphic coding of speech and audio: a model inversion approach. EURASTP J. Appl. Signal Process. 2005 9 (2005) 1334-1349
18. Frossard P., Vandergheynst P., Figueras i Ventura R., and Kunt M. A posteriori quantization of progressive matching pursuit streams. IEEE Trans. Signal Proc. 52 2 (2004) 525-535
19. Gabor D. Theory of communications. J. Inst. Electr. Commun. Eng. 93 III-26 (1946) 429-457
20. Garofolo J., Lamel L., Fisher W., Fiscus J., Pallet D., and Dahlgren N. The DARPA TIMIT Acoustic-Phonetic Continuous Speech Corpus CDROM. NTIS order number PB91-505065 (1990)
21. Goodwin M.M. Adaptive Signal Models: Theory, Algorithms, and Audio Applications (1998), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston
22. Gorodnitsky I., and Rao B. Sparse signal reconstruction from limited data using FOCUSS: are-weighted minimum norm algorithm. IEEE Trans. Signal Proc. 45 3 (1997) 600-616
23. Goyal V., Vetterli M., and Thao N. Quantized overcomplete expansions in IR N: analysis, synthesis, and algorithms. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 44 1 (1998) 16-31
24. Gribonval, R., 1999. Approximations non-linéaires pour l'analyse des signaux sonores. Ph.D. thesis, Université Paris IX Dauphine.
25. Gribonval R. Fast matching pursuit with a multiscale dictionary of Gaussian chirps. IEEE Trans. Signal Proc. 49 5 (2001) 994-1001
26. Gribonval R., and Krstulovic S. MPTK, The Matching Pursuit Toolkit (2005). http://mptk.gforge.inria.fr/ URL http://mptk.gforge.inria.fr/
27. Hoyer P. Non-negative sparse coding. Proceedings of the 12th IEEE Workshop on Neural Networks for Signal Processing (2002) 557-565
28. Huber R., and Kollmeier B. PEMO-Q: a new method for objective audio quality assessment using a model of auditory perception. IEEE Trans. Audio, Speech Lang. Process. 14 6 (2006) 1902-1911
29. Irino T. An optimal auditory filter. Proceedings of the IEEE ASSP Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics (1995) 198-201
30. ITU-R. Recommendation BS. 1387-1, Methods for Objective Measurements of Perceived Audio Quality (2001)
31. Krstulovic S., and Gribonval R. MPTK: matching pursuit made tractable. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP06) (2006)
32. Laughlin S.B., and Sejnowski T.J. Communication in neuronal networks. Science 301 5641 (2003) 1870-1874 (September)
33. Lewicki M. Efficient coding of natural sounds. Nature Neurosci. 5 4 (2002) 356-363
34. Mallat S., and Zhang Z. Matching pursuit in a time-frequency dictionary. IEEE Trans. Signal Proc. 41 12 (1993) 3397-3415
35. Malvar H. A modulated complex lapped transform and its applications to audioprocessing. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP99) (1999)
36. Manley G.A. Cochlear mechanisms from a phylogenetic viewpoint. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 97 22 (2000) 11736-11743 (October)
37. Moore B., Peters R., and Glasberg B. Auditory filter shapes at low center frequencies. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88 (1990) 132-140
38. Moving Picture Experts Group, Jul 1999. MPEG-4 Audio Version 2 (Final Committee Draft 14496-3 AMD1). ISO/IEC/JTC1/SC29/WG11 N2803.
39. Neff R., and Zakhor A. Very low bit-rate video coding based on matching pursuits. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. 7 1 (1997) 158-171
40. Olshausen B., and Field D. Sparse coding of sensory inputs. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 14 4 (2004) 481-487
41. Olshausen B., et al. Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images. Nature 381 6583 (1996) 607-609
42. Oppenheim A., and Schafer R. Discrete-Time Signal Processing (1989), Prentice-Hall Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA
43. Painter T., and Spanias A. Perceptual coding of digital audio. Proc. IEEE 88 4 (2000) 451-515
44. Patterson R. Auditory images: how complex sounds are represented in the auditory system. Acoust. Sci. Technol. 21 4 (2000) 183-190
45. Patterson R., and Moore B. Auditory filters and excitation patterns as representations of frequency resolution. In: Moore B. (Ed). Frequency Selectivity in Hearing (1986) 123-177
46. Patterson R., Nimmo-Smith I., Holdsworth J., and Rice P. An efficient auditory filterbank based on the gammatone function. APU Rep. 2341 (1988)
47. Smith, E., 2006. Efficient auditory coding. Ph.D. thesis, Carnegie Mellon University.
48. Smith E., and Lewicki M. Efficient coding of time-relative structure using spikes. Neural Comput. 17 (2005) 19-45
49. Smith E., and Lewicki M. Efficient auditory coding. Nature 439 7079 (2006) 978-982
50. Solbach L., Wöhrmann R., and Kliewer J. The complex-valued continuous wavelet transform as a preprocessor for auditory scene analysis. In: David F., and Rosenthal H.G.O. (Eds). Computational Auditory Scene Analysis (1998), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 273-291
51. Strahl S., Zhou H., and Mertins A. An adaptive tree-based progressive audio compression scheme. IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics (WASPAA05) (2005) 219-222
52. Toshio Irino R.D.P. Dynamic, compressive gammachirp auditory filterbank for perceptual signal processing. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP06) (2006) 133-136
53. Zwicker E. Subdivision of the audible frequency range into critical bands (Frequenzgruppen). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 33 (1961) 248