Disturbance attenuation by dynamic output feedback for input-delay systems

Automatica

Volumn 44, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 2202-2206

  Di Loreto, Michael ^a   Jacques Loiseau, Jean ^b   Lafay, Jean François ^b  

^a Univ Claude Bernard Lyon1   (France)

^b INSTITUT DE RECHERCHE EN COMMUNICATIONS ET CYBERNÉTIQUE DE NANTES   (France)

Author keywords

Almost invariance; Controlled and conditioned invariant subspaces; Disturbance attenuation; Geometric approach; Induced norm; Input delay system; Linear control; Optimal rejection

Indexed keywords

CONTROL THEORY; LINEAR SYSTEMS; MILITARY DATA PROCESSING; OBSERVABILITY; STATE FEEDBACK;

DISTURBANCE ATTENUATION; DYNAMIC OUTPUT FEEDBACK; ELSEVIER (CO); EQUIVALENT SYSTEM; GENERAL (CO); GEOMETRIC APPROACHES; INPUT DELAYS; MULTI VARIABLE LINEAR SYSTEMS; OBSERVER (OBS); OPTIMAL CONTROLLERS; OPTIMAL DISTURBANCES; OPTIMAL SOLUTIONS; OUTPUT FEEDBACKS; PAPER ADDRESSES; PLANT OUTPUT; SUFFICIENT CONDITIONS;

FEEDBACK;

EID: 48949118000     PISSN: 00051098     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2007.12.003     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Artstein Z. Linear systems with delayed controls: A reduction. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 27 4 (1982) 869-879
2. Conte G., and Perdon A.M. The disturbance decoupling problem for systems over a ring. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization 33 3 (1995)
3. 1-optimal compensators for continuous-time systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 32 10 (1987) 889-895
4. Desoer C.A., and Vidyasagar M. Feedback systems: Input-output properties (1975), Academic Press, New-York
5. Di Loreto, M., Lafay, J. F., & Loiseau, J. J. (2005). Disturbance attenuation for input-delay systems. In IFAC world congress
6. Manitius A.Z., and Olbrot A.W. Finite spectrum assignment problem for systems with delays. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 24 4 (1979) 541-553
7. 1 perspectives. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 51 6 (2006) 1069-1073
8. Mirkin, L., & Raskin, N. (1999). State-space parametrization of all stabilizing dead-time controllers. In 38th IEEE CDC (pp. 221-226)
9. Mirkin L., and Raskin N. Every stabilizing dead-time controller has an observer-predictor-based structure. Automatica 239 (2003) 1747-1754
10. Schumacher J.M. Compensator synthesis using (c, a, b)-pairs. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 25 6 (1980) 1133-1138
11. Trentelman, H. L. (1985). Almost invariant subspaces and high gain feedback. Ph.D. Thesis. The Netherlands: Eindhoven University of Technology
12. Vidyasagar M. Optimal rejection of persistent bounded disturbances. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 31 6 (1986) 527-534
13. Weiland S., and Willems J.C. Almost disturbance decoupling with internal stability. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 34 3 (1989) 277-286
14. Willems J.C. Almost invariant subspaces: an approach to high gain feedback design - Part 1 and part 2. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 26 (1982) 235-252 1071-1085
15. Willems J.C., and Commault C. Disturbance decoupling by measurement feedback with stability or pole placement. SIAM Journal on Control on Optimization 19 4 (1981) 491-504
16. Wonham W.M. Linear multivariable control - A geometric approach (1985), Springer-Verlag, New-York
17. Zhong Q.C. Control of integral processes with dead time - Part 3: Deadbeat disturbance response. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 48 1 (2003) 153-159
18. ∞ control of dead-time systems based on a transformation. Automatica 39 2 (2003) 361-366