Explaining modern economics (as a microcosm of society)

Cambridge Journal of Economics

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 527-554

  Bigo, Vinca ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Epistemology; Mainstream economics; Object relations theory; Ontology; Psychoanalysis

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC THEORY; MICROCOSM; NUMERICAL MODEL; PERSISTENCE; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 48949116733     PISSN: 0309166X     EISSN: 14643545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/cje/bem058     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Akerlof, G. A. 1970. The market for "Lemons: Quality Uncertainty and the Market mechanism, Quarterly Journal of Economics, no 84, 488-500
2. Akerlof, G. A. 1995 in George Shepherd ed. Rejected: Leading Economists Ponder The Publication Process. Sun Lakes, Arizona: Thomas Horton and Daughters
3. Albanese, P. 2002. The Personality Continuum and Consumer Behavior Westport, CT, Quorum
4. Alcoff, L. and Potter, E. 1993. Feminist Epistemologies, New York, Routledge
5. Baron-Cohen, S., Lawson, J. and Wheelwright, S. 2004. Empathising and systemising in adults with and without Asperger syndrome, Journal of Autism and Development Disorders, vol. 34, 301-10
6. Bergman, A. 1975. in Mahler, M. S., Pine, F. and Bergman, A. (eds), The Psychological Birth of the Human Infant, New York, Basic Books
7. Bigo, V. 2006. Open and closed systems and the Cambridge school, Review of Social Economy, vol. LXIV, 493-514
8. Blaug, M. 1997. Ugly currents in modern economics, Options Politiques September, 3-8
9. Bordo, S. R. 1987. The Flight to Objectivity: Essays on Cartesianism and Culture, New York, State University of New York Press
10. Chick, V. 1995. Order out of chaos' in economics? in Dow, S. and Hillard, J. (eds), Keynes, Knowledge and Uncertainty, Aldershot, Edward Elgar
11. Chick, V. 2003. 'The future is open: On open-system theorising in economics', Paper read at Economics for the Future, at University of Cambridge. 17-19 September, 2003
12. Chodorow, N. 1978. The Reproduction of Mothering, Berkeley, University of California
13. Chodorow, N. 1989. Feminism and Psychoanalytic Theory, New Haven and London, Yale University Press
14. Coase, R. 1999. Interview with Ronald Coase, Newsletter of the International Society for New Institutional Economics, vol. 2, no. 1, 3-10
15. Colander, D. 2000. The death of neoclassical economics, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, vol. 22, no. 2, 127-43
16. Colander, D., Holt, R. P. F. and Rosser, J. B. Jr (eds) 2004. The Changing Face of Economics: Interviews with Cutting Edge Economists, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press
17. Davis, J. B. 2006. The turn in economics: Neoclassical dominance to mainstream pluralism?, Journal of Institutional Economics, vol. 2, 1-20
18. Dow, S. C. 1990. Beyond dualism, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 14, no. 2, 143-57
19. Earl, P. 1983. The Economic Imagination: Towards a Behavioural Analysis of Choice, New York, Sharpe
20. Earl, P. E. 1986. Lifestyle Economics, Brighton, Wheatsheaf
21. Earl, P. E. 2005. Economics and psychology in the twenty-first century, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 29, no. 6, 909-26
22. Elster, J. 1996. Rationality and the emotions, The Economic Journal vol. 106, no. 438, 1386-97
23. Erikson, E. H. 1950. Childhood and Society, New York, W.W. Norton
24. Fairbairn, W. R. D. 1963. Synopsis of an object-relations theory of the personality, International Journal of Psychoanalysis, vol. 44, 224-5
25. Feiner, S. 2003. Reading neoclassical economics: Toward an erotic economy of sharing, pp. 180-93 in Barker, D. K. and Kuipers, E. (eds), Toward a Feminist Philosophy of Economics, London, Routledge
26. Freud, S. 1914. On Narcissism: An introduction, Standard Edition, no. 14, 73-102
27. Freud, S. 1920. Beyond the pleasure principle, Standard Edition, no. 18, 7-64
28. Freud, S. 1933. New introductory lectures on psycho-analysis, Standard Edition, no. 22, 5-182
29. Friedman, M. 1999. Conversation with Milton Friedman, pp. 124-44 in S. B. and V. H. (eds), Conversations with Leading Economists: Interpreting Modern Macroeconomics, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar
30. Garry, A. and Pearsall, M. (eds) 1996. Women, Knowledge and Reality 2nd edn, New York, Routledge
31. Gershaw, D. A. 1998. Psychology: Illusion-Delusion Confusion, available from http://www.jiskha.com/social_studies/psychology/ illusion_delusion.html (date last accessed: June 2007)
32. Gilligan, C. 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press
33. Greenberg, J. and Mitchell, S. 1983. Object Relations in Psychoanalytic Theory. Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press
34. Hahn, F. 1984. Equilibrium and Macroeconomics, Oxford, Basil Blackwell
35. Hahn, F. 1985. 'In Praise of Economic Theory', the 1984 Jevons Memorial Fund Lecture, London, University College
36. Hahn, F. 1992. Reflections, Royal Economics Society Newsletter, vol. 77 p.4
37. Hahn, F. 1994. An intellectual retrospect, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, 245-58
38. Halfpenny, P. 1997. "Situating simulation in sociology". Sociological Research Online, vol. 2, no. 3, http://www.socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/2/3/9.html
39. Harding, S. 1993. Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is 'strong objectivity?, in Alcoff, L. and Potter, E (eds), Feminist Epistemologies, New York, Routledge [reprinted in Keller, E. F. and Longino, H. E. (eds) 1996. Feminism and Science, pp. 235-248, Oxford and New York, Oxford University Press]
40. Harding, S. and Hintikka, M. B. (eds) 1983. Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Dordrecht, Reidel
41. Horner, A. J. 1984. Object Relations and the Developing Ego in Therapy, New York, J. Aronson
42. Irigaray, L. 1987. Le sujet de la science est-il sexué? (Is the subject of science sexed?), Hypatia, vol. 2, no. 3, 65-87 (trans. C. Mastrangelo Bové)
43. Keller, E. F. 1985. Reflections on Science and Gender, New Haven, CT, Yale University Press
44. Keller, E. F. and Longino, H. E. (eds) 1996. Feminism and Science, Oxford and New York, Oxford University Press
45. Kernberg, O. 1966. Structural derivatives of object relationships, International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 47, 236-53
46. Kernberg, O. 2005. 'Aggression and Transference in Severe Personality Disorders', available at http://www.toddlertime.com/dx/borderline/ bpd-kernberg.htm (date last accessed: June 2005)
47. Keynes, J. M. 1939. Professor Tinbergen's method, The Economic Journal, vol. 49, 558-70
48. Klein, M. 1948. A contribution to the theory of anxiety and guilt, International Journal of Psychoanalysis, vol. 29, 113-23
49. Klein, M. 1957. Envy and Gratitude: A Study of Unconscious Sources New York, Basic Books Inc.
50. Kohut, H. 1971. The Analysis of the Self: A Systematic Approach to the Psychoanalytic Treatment of Narcissistic Personality Disorders, New York, International Universities Press
51. Kristeva, J. 1998. The subject in process, pp. 133-78 in French, P. and Lack, R.-F. (eds), The Tel Quel Reader, London and New York, Routledge
52. Lawson, J. 2003. Depth accessibility difficulties: An alternative conceptualisation of autism spectrum conditions, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, vol. 33, no. 2, 189-202
53. Lawson, T. 1997. Economics and Reality, London, Routledge
54. Lawson, T. 2003. Reorienting Economics, London, Routledge
55. Lawson, T. 2006. The nature of heterodox economics, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 30, no. 2, 483-507
56. Leontief, W. 1982. Letter, Science, vol. 217, 104-7
57. Lipsey, R. G. 2001. Successes and failures in the transformation of economics, Journal of Economic Methodology, vol. 8, no. 2, 169-202
58. Loasby, B. J. 1983. Knowledge, learning and enterprise, pp. 104-21 in Wiseman, J. (ed.), Beyond Positive Economics?, London, Macmillan
59. Longino, H. 1990. Science as Social Knowledge, Princeton, Princeton University Press
60. Maguire, M. 1995. Women and Men: Passion and Power, London, Routledge
61. Maslow, A. H. 1968. Toward a Psychology of Being, 2nd edn, New York, van Nostrand Reinholt
62. McCloskey, D. N. 1983. The rhetoric of economics, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. xxi, 481-517
63. Mearman, A. 2005. Sheila Dow's concept of dualism: Clarification, criticism and development, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 29, no. 4, 619-34
64. Mitchell, J. 2003. Siblings: Sex and Violence, London, Polity Press
65. Mitchell, S. A and Black, M. J. 1995. Freud and Beyond: A History of Modern Psychoanalytic Thought, New York, Basic Books
66. Morgan, M. 1999. The Projective Gridlock: A Form of Projective Identification in Couple Relationships, available at http://www.psychoanalysis.org.uk/gridlock.htm (date last accessed January 2006) [a full version of this paper is published in Ruszczynski, S. and Fisher, J. (eds) 1995. Intrusiveness and Intimacy in the Couple, pp. 33-48, London, Karnac]
67. Murdoch, J. 1977. The Fire and the Sun, Oxford, Oxford University Press
68. Nelson, J. 2001. "Confronting the Science/Value Split: Notes on Feminist Economics, Institutionalism, Pragmatism and Process Thought", Paper read at International Association for Feminist Economics (Plenary address) [Later published in 2003. Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 27, no. 1, 49-64].
69. Nelson, J. A. 1992. Gender, metaphor and the definition of economics, Economics and Philosophy, vol. 8, 103-25
70. Nelson, J. A. 1996. Feminism, Objectivity and Economics, London, Routledge
71. Northover, P. 1999. Evolutionary growth theory and forms of realism, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 23, no. 1, 36-63
72. Oakley, A. 1972. Sex Gender and Society, London, Temple Smith
73. Perona, E. 2004. 'The Confused State of Complexity in Economics: An Ontological Explanation', Paper read at New 2004 - Complexity and Economic Policy, at the University of Salerno, Italy, September 2004
74. Rosenfeld, H. 1987. Impasse and Interpretation, New Library of Psychoanalysis 1, London, Tavistock Publications
75. Rotheim, R. 2002. Timeful theories, timeful economists, pp. 62-72 in Arestis, P., Desai, M. and Dow, S. C. (eds), Methodology, Microeconomics and Keynes, London, Routledge
76. Rubinstein A. 1995. John Nash: The master of economic modelling, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, vol. 97, no. 1. 9-13
77. Stoller, R. 1968. Sex and Gender: On the Development of Masculinity and Femininity, New York, Science House
78. Strassmann, D. 1993. Not a free market: The rhetoric of disciplinary authority in economics, pp. 54-68 in Ferber, M. A. and Nelson, J. A. (eds), Beyond Economic Man: Feminist Theory and Economics, Chicago, University of Chicago Press
79. Strassmann, D. 1994. Feminist thought and economics; or, what do the Visigoths know?, American Economic Review, vol. 84, no. 2. 153-8
80. Tishkowski, D. 2006. Available at http://clearinghouse.missouriwestern.edu/manuscripts/565.asp (date last accessed June 2007)
81. van der Lecq, F. 1996. 'Dualism in Economic Thinking: Two Views Compared'. Research report no. 96C01, Graduate School, Research Institute Systems, Organisations and Management (SOM), University of Groningen, Groningen
82. Williams, J. B. 2003. 'Economists Must Learn to Subtract'. available at http://www.jeremybwilliams.net/ruminations/archives/2003_06.html (date last accessed June 2007)
83. Winnicott, D. 1953. Transitional objects and transitional phenomena, International Journal of Psychoanalysis, vol. 34, 89-97
84. Winnicott, D. 1965. Failure of expectable environment on child's mental functioning, International Journal of Psychoanalysis, vol. 46, 81-7