Three-Dimensional Digital Evaluation of Breast Symmetry after Breast Conservation Therapy

Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Volumn 207, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 227-232

  Moyer, Hunter R ^a   Carlson, Grant W ^a   Styblo, Toncred M ^a   Losken, Albert ^a  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CONSERVATION THERAPY; BREAST EXAMINATION; CANCER LOCALIZATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROL GROUP; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXCISION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MASTECTOMY; PARENCHYMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; PHOTOGRAPHY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 48949116099     PISSN: 10727515     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.02.012     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Fisher B., Bauer M., Margolese R., et al. Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 312 (1985) 665-673
2. Veronesi U., Salvadori B., Luini A., et al. Breast conservation is a safe method in patients with small cancer of the breast. Long-term results of three randomised trials on 1,973 patients [comment]. Eur J Cancer 31A (1995) 1574-1579
3. Aniello C., Grimaldi L., Barbato A., et al. Cosmetic results in 242 patients treated by conservative surgery for breast cancer. Scand J Plast Reconstruct Surg Hand Surg 33 (1999) 419-422
4. Deutsch M., and Flickinger J.C. Patient characteristics and treatment factors affecting cosmesis following lumpectomy and breast irradiation. Am J Clin Oncol 26 (2003) 350-353
5. Markiewicz D.A., Schultz D.J., Haas J.A., et al. The effects of sequence and type of chemotherapy and radiation therapy on cosmesis and complications after breast conservation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 35 (1996) 661-668
6. Nakamura S., Woo C., Silberman H., et al. Breast-conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ: a 20-year experience with excision plus radiation therapy. Am J Surg 184 (2002) 403-409
7. Schwartz G.F., Veronesi U., Clough K.B., et al. Consensus Conference on Breast Conservation. J Am Coll Surg 203 (2006) 198-207
8. Staradub V.L., Rademaker A.W., and Morrow M. Factors influencing outcomes for breast conservation therapy of mammographically detected malignancies. J Am Coll Surg 196 (2003) 518-524
9. Taylor M.E., Perez C.A., Halverson K.J., et al. Factors influencing cosmetic results after conservation therapy for breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 31 (1995) 753-764
10. Wazer D.E., DiPetrillo T., Schmidt-Ullrich R., et al. Factors influencing cosmetic outcome and complication risk after conservative surgery and radiotherapy for early-stage breast carcinoma. [comment]. J Clin Oncol 10 (1992) 356-363
11. Abner A.L., Recht A., Vicini F.A., et al. Cosmetic results after surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy for early breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 21 (1991) 331-338
12. Vrieling C., Collette L., Fourquet A., et al. The influence of patient, tumor and treatment factors on the cosmetic results after breast-conserving therapy in the EORTC 'boost vs. no boost' trial. EORTC Radiotherapy and Breast Cancer Cooperative Groups. Radiother Oncol 55 (2000) 219-232
13. Fortin A., Cheang M., and Latosinsky S. Cosmetic outcomes following breast conservation therapy: in search of a reliable scale. Breast Cancer Res Treat 100 (2006) 65-70
14. Cardoso M.J., Cardoso J., Santos A.C., et al. Factors determining esthetic outcome after breast cancer conservative treatment. Breast J 13 (2007) 140-146
15. Edstrom L.E., Robson M.C., and Wright J.K. A method for the evaluation of minor degrees of breast asymmetry. Plast Reconstruct Surg 60 (1977) 812-814
16. Penn J. Breast reduction. Br J Plast Surg 7 (1955) 357-371
17. Malata C.M., Boot J.C., Bradbury E.T., et al. Congenital breast asymmetry: subjective and objective assessment. Br J Plast Surg 47 (1994) 95-102
18. Cardoso M.J., Cardoso J., Amaral N., et al. Turning subjective into objective: the BCCT core software for evaluation of cosmetic results in breast cancer conservative treatment. Breast 16 (2007) 456-461
19. Fitzal F., Krois W., Trischler H., et al. The use of a breast symmetry index for objective evaluation of breast cosmesis. Breast 16 (2007) 429-435
20. Losken A., Seify H., Denson D.D., et al. Validating three-dimensional imaging of the breast [comment]. Ann Plast Surg 54 (2005) 471-476 discussion 477-478
21. Bajaj A.K., Kon P.S., Oberg K.C., and Miles D.A.G. Aesthetic outcomes in patients undergoing breast conservation therapy for the treatment of localized breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 114 (2004) 1442-1449
22. de la Rochefordiere A., Abner A.L., Silver B., et al. Are cosmetic results following conservative surgery and radiation therapy for early breast cancer dependent on technique?. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 23 (1992) 925-931
23. Olivotto I.A., Rose M.A., Osteen R.T., et al. Late cosmetic outcome after conservative surgery and radiotherapy: analysis of causes of cosmetic failure. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 17 (1989) 747-753
24. Moorthy K., Asopa V., Wiggins E., and Callam M. Is the reexcision rate higher if breast conservation surgery is performed by surgical trainees?. Am J Surg 188 (2004) 45-48
25. Tartter P.I., Kaplan J., Bleiweiss I., et al. Lumpectomy margins, reexcision, and local recurrence of breast cancer. Am J Surg 179 (2000) 81-85