Electoral simultaneity: Expressing equal respect

Journal of Social Issues

Volumn 64, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 487-501

  Thompson, Dennis F ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CIVIL SOCIETY; DEMOCRACY; ELECTION; ELECTORAL GEOGRAPHY; POLITICAL PARTICIPATION; POLITICAL THEORY; THEORETICAL STUDY; VOTING BEHAVIOR;

EID: 48949104637     PISSN: 00224537     EISSN: 15404560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00574.x     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Adams, W. C. (2005). Election night news and voter turnout: Solving the projection puzzle. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
2. Anderson, E. S., & Pildes, R. H. (2000). Expressive theories of law: A general restatement. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 148, 1503-1575.
3. Berinksy, A. (2005). The perverse consequences of electoral reform in the United States. American Politics Research, 33, 471-491.
4. Berinksy, A., Burns, N., & Traugott M. W. (2001). Who votes by mail? A dynamic model of the individual-level consequences of voting-by-mail systems. Public Opinion Quarterly, 65, 178-197.
5. Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project. (2001). Voting: What is, what could be. Available at: Http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/nr/2001/ VTP_report_all.pdf.
6. Constitution Project. (2001). Forum on election reform. In Building consensus on election reform. Washington, DC: Election Reform Initiative.
7. Correspondents of the New York Times. (2001). 36 days: The complete chronicle of the 2000 presidential election crisis. New York: Times Books and Henry Holt.
8. Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality and need. Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137-149.
9. Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
10. Dobrzynska, A., Blais, B., & Nadeau, R. (2003). Do the media have a direct impact on the vote? International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 15, 27-43.
11. Farrell, D. M. (2001). Electoral systems: A comparative introduction. New York: Palgrave.
12. Federal Election Commission. (1994). Early voting. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
13. Funk, P. (2006, June). Modern voting tools, social incentives and voter turnout: Theory and evidence (Working Paper, SITE). Stockholm School of Economics.
14. Green, D. P., & Shapiro, I. (1994). Pathologies of rational choice: A critique of applications in political science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
15. Gronke, P. (2004, September 2-5). Early voting reforms and American elections. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of American Political Science Association, Chicago.
16. Gronke, P., Galanes-Rosenbaum, E., & Miller, P. A. (2007, January 16-17). Early voting and turnout. Paper presented at conference on 2008 and Beyond, Department of Political Science, Kent State University, Kent, OH.
17. Gronke, P., & Toffey, D. R. (this issue). The psychological and institutional determinants of early voting.
18. Hansen, J. M. (2002a). Task force on the federal election system: Early voting, unrestricted absentee voting, and voting by mail. In To assure pride and confidence in the electoral process: A report of the National Commission on Federal Election Reform (pp. 163-179). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
19. Hansen, J. M. (2002b). Task force on the federal election system: Sizing the problem. In To assure pride and confidence in the electoral process: A report of the National Commission on Federal Election Reform (pp. 121-129). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
20. Hansen, J. M. (2002c). Task force on the federal election system: Uniform poll closing and reporting. In To assure pride and confidence in the electoral process: A report of the National Commission on Federal Election Reform (pp. 201-216). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
21. Huo, Y. J. (2002). Justice and the regulation of social relations: When and why do group members deny claims to social goods? British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 535-562.
22. Issacharoff, S., Karlan, P. S., & Pildes, R. H. (2001). When elections go bad: The law of democracy and the presidential election of 2000. New York: Foundation Press.
23. Iyengar, S. & Kinder, D. R. (1989). News that matters: Television and American opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24. Jackson, J. E. (1983). Election night reporting and voter turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 27, 615-635.
25. Kenney, P., & Rice, T. (1994). The psychology of political momentum. Political Research Quarterly, 47, 923-938.
26. Konner, J., Risser, J., & Wattenberg, B. (2001, January 29). Television's performance on election night 2000: A report for CNN. Atlanta, GA: CNN.
27. Lessig, L. (1995). The regulation of social meaning. University of Chicago Law Review, 62, 943-1045.
28. Madison, J. (1987). In A. Koch (Ed.), Notes of debates in the federal convention of 1787 reported by James Madison. New York: Norton.
29. McAdams, R. (1997). The origin, development and regulation of norms. Michigan Law Review, 96, 338-433.
30. McAllister, I., & Studlar, D. (1991). Bandwagon, underdog, or projection? Opinion polls and electoral choice in Britain, 1979-1987. Journal of Politics, 53, 720-741.
31. Miljan, L. (2005, June 2-5). Reporting of public opinion polls: Results of local polling published in the Windsor Star. Paper prepared for Annual Canadian Political Science Association conference, London, Ontario.
32. Mill, J. S. (1977a). Considerations on representative government. In J. M. Robson (Ed.), Essays on politics and society, Collected Works (vol. 19, pp. 399-412, 467-481). London: Routledge.
33. Mill, J. S. (1977b). De Tocqueville on democracy in America (II). In J. M. Robson (Ed.), Essays on politics and society, Collected Works (vol. 18, pp. 153-204). London: Routledge.
34. National Commission on Federal Election Reform. (2002). To assure pride and confidence in the electoral process: A report of the National Commission on Federal Election Reform. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
35. Navazio, R. (1977). An experimental approach to bandwagon research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 41, 217-225.
36. Oliver, J. E. (1996). The effects of eligibility restrictions and party activity on absentee voting and overall turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 498-513.
37. Political Staff of the Washington Post. (2001). Deadlock: The inside story of America's closet election. New York: Public Affairs Press.
38. Polsby, N., & Wildavsky, A. (2000). Presidential elections (10th ed.). New York: Chatham House.
39. Shklar, J. (1991). American citizenship. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40. Solop, F. I. (2001). Digital democracy comes of age: Internet voting and the 2000 Arizona democratic primary election. PS: Political Science and Politics, 34, 289-293.
41. Spangenberg, F. (2003). The freedom to publish opinion poll results: Report on a worldwide update. Lincoln, NE: The World Association for Public Opinion Research.
42. State of Florida. (2000, December 12). Journal of the house of representatives. First Special Session, "A"of 2000-2002.
43. Stein, R. M. (1998). Early voting. Public Opinion Quarterly, 62, 57-69.
44. Steinberg, J., & Carr, D. (2004, November 1). Media timing and the October surprise. New York Times, p. C1.
45. Sunstein, C. (1996). On the expressive function of law. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 144, 2021-2053.
46. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
47. Thompson, D. F. (2002). Just elections: Creating a fair electoral process in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48. Thompson, D. F. (2004). election time: Normative implications of temporal properties of the electoral process in the United States. American Political Science Review, 98, 51-63.
49. Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. (2000). Cooperation in groups. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
50. Tyler, T.R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 25, pp. 115-191). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
51. Uscinski, J. E. (2007). Too close to call? Uncertainty and bias in election-night reporting. Social Science Quarterly, 88, 51-67.
52. U.S. House Committee on Energy and Commerce. (2001). Hearings on election night coverage. 107th Cong., 1st Sess., 14 February.
53. Valenty, L. O., & Brent, J. C. (2000). Online voting: Calculating risks and benefits to the community and the individual. In I. Vogelsang & B.M. Compaine (Eds.), The Internet upheaval (pp. 99-126). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
54. Van Natta, D. (2000, November 15). Counting the vote: Palm Beach county. New York Times, p. A1.
55. Weaver, D. (1996). What voters learn from media. Annals, AAPSS, 546, 34-47.
56. Xinshu, Z., & Bleske, G. (1998). Polling effects: Horse-race and audience issue learning. Press/Politics, 3, 13-34.