What goes down must come up? Trends of industrial electricity use in the North-West of Russia

Energy Policy

Volumn 36, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 3588-3597

  Korppoo, Anna ^a,b   Luukkanen, Jyrki ^b   Vehmas, Jarmo ^b   Kinnunen, Miia ^b  

^a FINNISH INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Decomposition; Electricity; Russia

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; CONSERVATION; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; EFFICIENCY; ELECTRIC INDUSTRY; ELECTRIC POWER UTILIZATION; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; FORESTRY; TIMBER;

DECOMPOSITION; DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS; DECOMPOSITION METHODS; ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES; ELECTRICITY; ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION; ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY; ELECTRICITY SECTORS; ELECTRICITY USE; FORESTRY SECTORS; GENERAL KNOWLEDGE; MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES; OBSERVATION PERIOD; RUSSIA; STRUCTURAL CHANGES;

ELECTRIC NETWORK ANALYSIS;

ECONOMIC ACTIVITY; ELECTRICITY; ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY MARKET; ENERGY USE; MARKET TRANSITION;

AGRICULTURE; CONSERVATION; DECAY; EFFICIENCY; ELECTRICITY; ENERGY; FORESTRY;

EURASIA; KARELIA [(ADS) RUSSIAN FEDERATION]; MURMANSK [RUSSIAN FEDERATION]; RUSSIAN FEDERATION;

EID: 48949089832     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.05.024     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Albrecht J., François D., and Schoors K. A Shapley decomposition of carbon emissions without residuals. Energy Policy 30 (2002) 727-736
2. Ang B.W. Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy: which is the preferred method?. Energy Policy 32 (2004) 1131-1139
3. Ang B.W., and Zhang F.Q. A survey of index decomposition analysis in energy and environmental studies. Energy 25 (2000) 1149-1176
4. Ang B.W., Liu F.L., and Chew E.P. Perfect decomposition techniques in energy and environmental analysis. Energy Policy 31 (2003) 1561-1566
5. Archangelsk Oblkomstat Dataset. Purchased special set of data on the economy and energy consumption of Archangelsk region in 1990-2003.
6. Barentsenergy Website: Archangelsk-primary energy supply. Available at 〈http://www2.techsell.ru/stem/smpage.fwx?page=1611&submenu=0〉. Accessed 100108.
7. Cooper C., and Schipper L. The Soviet energy conservation dilemma. Energy Policy 19 (1991) 344-363
8. Corneille, J., Fankhauser, S., 2002. The energy intensity of transition countries, Working Paper No. 72, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, June 2002.
9. Didyk, V., 2005. Personal Communication by email.
10. Engoian A. Industrial and institutional restructuring of the Russian electricity sector: status and issues. Energy Policy 34 (2006) 3233-3244
11. Filippov P., Dudarev G., and Osipov A. Energy3: Raw materials, Production and Technology. A Competitive Analysis of the Northwest Russian Energy Cluster (2003), ETLA, the Research Institute of the Finnish Economy. Taloustieto Oy, Helsinki
12. IEA. Russia Energy Survey (2002), OECD/IEA
13. IEA. Renewables in Russia. From Opportunity to Reality (2003), OECD/IEA
14. IEA. Russian Electricity Reform: Emerging Challenges and Opportunities (2005), OECD/IEA
15. IEA Database, 2005a. Energy Balances of Non-OECD Countries 1971-2003.
16. IEA Database, 2005b. Energy Balances of OECD Countries 1960-2003.
17. Ivanova, L., Nygaard, V., 1999. Institutions and the emergence of the market-transition in the Murmansk forest sector. IR-99-071, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. Available at 〈http://www.iiasa.ac.at/Publications/Documents/IR-99-071.pdf〉. Accessed 9 January 2008.
18. Karelenergo, 2004. Website available at 〈http://www.karelen.elektra.ru/Info/Overview/CF107515F452466F432567D7004B7F1E.html〉. Accessed 6 July 2004.
19. Karelkomstat, 2003. Promishlennost Respubliki Karelii, Komitet Gosudarstvennoi Statistiki Respubliki Karelija (in Russian).
20. Karelkomstat Dataset. Purchased special set of data on Karelian economy and energy consumption in 1990-2003.
21. Kolenergo, 2005. Available at 〈http://www.kolenergo.ru/〉 Accessed 23 May 2007.
22. Kornai J. The place of the soft budget constraint syndrome in economic theory. Journal of Comparative Economics 26 (1998) 11-17
23. Korppoo, A., 2007. Drivers and barriers to energy efficiency in the Russian pulp and paper industry. Ph.D. Thesis, Imperial College London.
24. Kosonen R. Luoteis-Venäjän alueiden rakennemuutos talousseurannan kohteena. Terra 115 (2003) 89-97 (in Finnish)
25. Kosonen, R., Juurikkala, T., 2003. Monitoring regional differences in Northwest Russia. In: Presentation Paper. Presentation at the European Regional Science Association 2003 Congress, 27-30 August, Jyväskylä, Finland.
26. 2 efficiency dynamics in the years 1960-1997. Energy-The International Journal 27 (2002) 135-150
27. 2 efficiency dynamics. Energy Policy 30 (2002) 281-292
28. 2 emissions to equal per capita levels. Mission Possible? FFRC-Publications 2/2005, Turku School of Economics.
29. Murmansk Oblkomstat Dataset. Purchased Special Set of Data on the Economy and Energy Consumption of Murmansk in 1990-2003.
30. Nove A. The Soviet Economic System (1977), George Allen & Unwin Publishers Ltd., London
31. Pittman R. Restructuring the Russian electricity sector: re-creating California?. Energy Policy 35 (2007) 1872-1883
32. Phylipsen G.J.M., Blok K., and Worrell E. Handbook on International Comparisons of Energy Efficiency in the Manufacturing Industry (1998), Department of Science, Technology and Society, Utrecht University
33. RAO UES, 2006. RAO UES Website: "Share capital structure". Available at 〈http://www.rao-ees.ru/en/invest/show.cgi?content.htm〉 Accessed 18 August 2006.
34. Rosstat, 2004. Regioni Rossii. Sotsialno-ekonomitseskie pokazateli. Moscow, 2004.
35. RusAl Website. Russian aluminium: How it all began. Available at 〈http://www.rusal.com/index.php?lang=eng&subtopic=182&subtopic2=292&topic=5〉. Accessed 7 January 2008.
36. Russian Government, 2003. Energy Strategy of Russia for the period until 2020. Published in October 2000. Adopted by the Government of the Russian Federation, 28 August 2003, No. 1234-p.
37. Sun J.W. Changes in energy consumption and energy intensity: a complete decomposition model. Energy Economics 20 (1998) 85-100
38. Sun J.W., and Ang B.W. Some properties of an exact energy decomposition model. Energy 25 (2000) 1177-1188
39. University of Joensuu, 2000. The Republic of Karelia in the 90 s. Biannual review, December 2000. Available at 〈http://www.economicmonitoring.com/data/reports/Karelia_dec00_ENG.pdf〉. Accessed 7 November 2006.
40. University of Joensuu. Republic of Karelia. The First Half of 2002. Biannual Monitoring Review. November 2002 (2002), Karelian Science Centre
41. University of Joensuu, 2005. The Republic of Karelia in the first half of 2005. Biannual Review, November 2005. Available at 〈http://www.economicmonitoring.com/data/reports/Karelia_nov05_ENG.pdf〉. Accessed 7 November 2006.
42. University of Lapland, 2000. Murmansk Province in the 1990s. Biannual Review. Available at 〈http://www.economicmonitoring.com/data/reports/Murmansk_dec00_ENG.pdf〉. Accessed 16 November 2006.
43. University of Lapland, 2004. Murmansk Province in the First Half of 2004. Biannual Monitoring Review. Available at 〈http://www.economicmonitoring.com/data/reports/Murmansk_dec04_ENG.pdf〉. Accessed 16 November 2006.
44. Ürge-Vorsatz D., Miladinova G., and Paizs L. Energy in transition: from the iron curtain to the European Union. Energy Policy 34 (2006) 2279-2297
45. Yegorov, I., 2003. Archangelsk Region Overview, BISNIS, March 2003. Available at 〈http://www.bisnis.doc.gov/bisnis/bisdoc/0303ArchangelskOver.htm〉. Accessed 9 November 2006.
46. Zhang Z. Why did the energy intensity fall in China's industrial sector in the 1990s? The relative importance of structural change and intensity change. Energy Economics 25 (2003) 625-638