The psychological and institutional determinants of early voting

Journal of Social Issues

Volumn 64, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 503-524

  Gronke, Paul ^a,b   Toffey, Daniel Krantz ^a  

^a REED COLLEGE   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DECISION MAKING; DEMOGRAPHIC TREND; ELECTION; ELECTORAL GEOGRAPHY; MODEL; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; POLITICAL IDEOLOGY; POLITICAL PARTICIPATION; THEORETICAL STUDY; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; VOTING BEHAVIOR;

EID: 48949085476     PISSN: 00224537     EISSN: 15404560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00575.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Alvarez, R. M. (1998). Information and elections (rev. ed). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
2. Alvarez, R. M., Hall, T., & Llewellyn, M. (2008). Are Americans confident their ballots are being counted? Journal of Politics, (forthcoming).
3. Amenta, E. (1998). Bold relief: Institutional politics and the origins of modern American social policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4. Berinsky, A. J. (2005). The perverse consequences of electoral reform in the United States. American Politics Research, 33(4), 471-491.
5. Berinsky, A. J., Burns, N., & Traugott, M. W. (2001). Who votes by mail? A dynamic model of the individual-level consequences of voting-by-mail systems. Public Opinion Quarterly, 65(1), 178-197.
6. Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., & Kimball, D. (1999). The timing of voting decisions in presidential campaigns. Chicago: Midwest Political Science Association.
7. Bradbury, B. (2005, January 1). Vote by mail: The real winner is democracy. Washington Post, p. A23.
8. Fournier, P., Nadeau, R., Blais, A., Gidengil, E., & Nevitte, N. (2004). Time-of-voting decision and susceptibility to campaign effects. Electoral Studies, 23(4), 661-681.
9. Gronke, P. (1992). Overreporting the vote in the 1988 Senate election study: A response to Wright. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 17(1), 113-129.
10. Gronke, P. (2000). The electorate, the campaign, and the office: A unified approach to Senate and House elections. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
11. Gronke, P. (2004). Early voting reforms and American elections. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
12. Gronke, P., Bishin, B., Stevens, D., & Galanes-Rosenbaum, E. (2005). Early voting in Florida, 2004. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
13. Gronke, P., & Galanes-Rosenbaum, E. (2008). The growth of early and non-precinct place voting: When, why, and prospects for the future. In B. Griffith (Ed.), America votes! A guide to election law and voting rights (pp. 261-280). Cleveland, OH: Lachina Publishing.
14. Gronke, P., Galanes-Rosenbaum, E., & Miller, P. (2007). Early voting and turnout. PS: Political Science and Politics, 40(4), 639-645.
15. Hamilton, D. (2006). The Oregon voting revolution: How a vote by mail experiment transformed the democratic process. Retrieved April 13, 2006, from The American Prospect Website: http://www.prospect.org/cs/ articles?article=the_oregon_voting_revolution.
16. Kahn, K. F., & Kenney, P. J. (1999). The spectacle of U.S. senate campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17. Karp, J. A., & Banduycci, S. A. (2001). Absentee voting, mobilization, and participation. American Politics Research, 29(2), 183-195.
18. Kenski, K. (2005). Early voting reaches record levels in 2004, National Annenberg Election Survey show. Retrieved May 10, 2008, from Annenberg Public Policy Center Website: http://annenbergclassroom.net/Downloads/ Political_Communication/naes/2204_03_early%20voting%203_23_05_pr.pdf.
19. King, G., Tomz, M., & Wittenburg, J. (2000). Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science, 44(3), 341-355.
20. Kuttner, R. (2006). Going postal: With vote by mail, Oregon has higher voter turnout and spends less money running election. Retrieved April 16, 2006, from The American Prospect Website: http://www.prospect.org/cs/ articles?article=going_postal.
21. Lassen, D. D. (2005). The effect of information on voter turnout: Evidence from a natural experiment. American Journal of Political Science, 49(1), 103-118.
22. McDonald, M. P. (2003). On the over-report bias of the National Election Survey. Political Analysis, 11(2), 180-186.
23. Page, B. I. (1978). Choices and echoes in Presidential elections. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24. Rosenstone, S. J., & Hansen, J. M. (1993). Mobilization, participation, and American democracy. New York: Macmillan.
25. Stein, R., & García-Monet, P. A. (1997). Voting early but not often. Social Science Quarterly, 78(3), 657-671.
26. Stein, R. M., Leighley, J., & Owens, C. (2004). Voting, early voting and the determinants of vote choice: Is timing everything? Chicago, IL: Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.
27. Toffey, D. (2007). Going nuts in the Nutmeg State? Undergraduate thesis, Department of Political Science, Reed College, Portland OR.
28. Wright, G. (1990). Misreports of vote choice in the 1988 NES senate election study. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 15(4), 543-563.
29. Zaller, J. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.