Sequential univariate gating approach to study the effects of erythropoietin in murine bone marrow

Cytometry Part A

Volumn 73, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 702-714

  Achuthanandam, Ram ^a,b   Quinn, John ^c,d   Capocasale, Renold J ^b   Bugelski, Peter J ^b   Hrebien, Leonid ^a   Kam, Moshe ^a  

^a Drexel University   (United States)

^b CENTOCOR INC   (United States)

^c DREXEL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Treestar Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Cluster analysis; Erythropoietin; FDG; Flow cytometry; Kolmogorov Smirnov statistic; Multivariate data analysis

Indexed keywords

CD3 ANTIBODY; RECOMBINANT ERYTHROPOIETIN;

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BONE MARROW; CD25+ T LYMPHOCYTE; CD4+ T LYMPHOCYTE; CD8+ T LYMPHOCYTE; CELL EXPANSION; CELL STRUCTURE; CELL SUBPOPULATION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ERYTHROID CELL; FLOW CYTOMETRY; KOLMOGOROV SMIRNOV TEST; MOUSE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEQUENTIAL UNIVARIATE GATING; STEM CELL; T LYMPHOCYTE ACTIVATION; UNIVARIATE ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; ANTIBODIES; ANTIGENS, CD3; BONE MARROW CELLS; CELL PROLIFERATION; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; ERYTHROID CELLS; ERYTHROPOIETIN, RECOMBINANT; FLOW CYTOMETRY; HUMANS; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; SPLEEN; STEM CELLS;

EID: 48849116960     PISSN: 15524922     EISSN: 15524930     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.20584     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Fisher JW. Erythropoietin: Physiology and pharmacology update. Exp Biol Med 2003;228:1-14.
2. Spivak JL. The mechanism of action of erythropoietin. Int J Cell Cloning 1986;3:139-166.
3. Socolovsky M, Nam H, Fleming MD, Haase VH, Brugnara C, Lodish HF. Ineffective erythropoiesis in Stat5a(-/-)5b(-/-) mice due to decreased survival of early erythroblasts. Blood 2001;98:3261-3273.
4. Lin FK, Suggs S, Lin CH, Browne JK, Smailing R, Eric JC, Chen KK, Fox GM, Martin F, Wasser Z. Cloning and expression of the human erythropoietin gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1985;92:7850-7884.
5. Jacobs K, Shoemaker C, Rudersdorf R, Neill SD, Kaufman RJ, Mufson A, Seehra A, Jones SS, Hewick R, Fritsch EF. Isolation and characterization of genomic cDNA clones of human erythropoietin. Nature 1985;313:806-810.
6. Hoffman R, Benz EJ, Shattil SJ, Furie B, Cohen H, Silberstein LE, McGlave P. Hematology: Basic Principles and Practice. Elsevier; 2000.
7. Lesley J, Hyman R, Schulte R, Trotter J. Expression of transferrin receptor on murine hematopoietic progenitors. Cell Immunol 1984;83:14-25.
8. Zhang J, Socolovsky M, Gross AW, Lodish HF. Role of ras signaling in erythroid differentiation of mouse fetal liver cells: Functional analysis by a flow cytometry-based novel culture system. Blood 2003;102:3938-3946.
9. Kina T, Ikuta K, Takayama E, Wada K, Majumdar AS, Weissman IL, Katsura Y. The monoclonal antibody TER-119 recognizes a molecule associated with glycophorin A and specifically marks the late stages of murine erythroid lineage. Br J Hematol 2000;109:280-287.
10. Ito M, Anan K, Misawa M, Kai S, Hara J. In vitro differnetiation of Sca-1 + Lin- cells into myeloid. B cell and T cell lineages. Stem Cells 1996;14:412-418.
11. Lagasse E, Weissman IL. Flow Cytometric identification of murine neutrophils and monocytes. J Immunol Methods 1996;197:139-150.
12. Fleming TJ, Fleming ML, Malek TR. Selective expression of Ly-6G on myeloid lineage cells in mouse bone marrow. RB6-8C5 mAb to granulocyte- differentiation antigen (Gr-1) detects members of the Ly-6 family. J Immunol Methods 1993;151:2399-2408.
13. Goodwin RG, Friend D, Ziegler SF, Jerzy R, Falk BA, Gimpel S, Cosman D, March SKDJ, Namen AE, Park LS. Cloning of the human and murine interleukin-7 receptors: Demonstration of a soluble form and homology to a new receptor superfamily. Cell 1990;60:941-951.
14. Overton RW. Modified histogram subtraction technique for analysis of flow cytometry data. Cytometry 1999;9:619-626.
15. Cox C, Reeder JE, Robinson RD, Suppes SB, Wheeless LL. Comparison of frequency distributions in flow cytometry. Cytometry 1988;9:291-298.
16. Lampariello F. Evaluation of the number of positive cells from flow cytometryic immunoassays by mathematical modelling of cellular autofluorescence. Cytometry 1994;15:294-301.
17. Lampariello F, Aiello A. Complete mathematical modeling method for the analysis of immunofluorescence distribution composed of negative and weakly positive cells. Cytometry 1994;32:241-254.
18. Bagwell CB. A journey through flow cytometric immunofluorescence analyses. Clin Immunol Newsl 1996:33-37.
19. Bagwell CB, Hudson JL, Irvin GL. Nonparametric flow cytometry analysis. J Histochem Cytochem 1979;27:293-296.
20. Roederer M, Treister A, Moore W, Herzenberg L. Probability binning comparison: A metric for quantitating univariate distribution differences. Cytometry 2001;45:37-46.
21. Roederer M, Treister A, Moore W, Hardy R, Herzenberg L. Probability binning comparison: A metric for quantitating multivariate distribution differences. Cytometry 2001;45:47-55.
22. Roederer M, Hardy R. Frequency difference gating: A multivariate method for identifying subsets that differ between samples. Cytometry 2001;45:56-64.
23. Siegel S, Castellan NJ. Nonparametric Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences. McGraw-Hill; 1988.
24. Frigui H, Krishnapuram R. A robust competitive clustering algorithm with applications in computer vision. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal 1999;21:450-465.
25. Duda R, Hart P, Stork D. Pattern Classification. Wiley Interscience; 2000.