Development of a learning content management system

WSEAS Transactions on Information Science and Applications

Volumn 5, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1001-1010

  Abazi Bexheti, Lejla ^a  

^a SEE University   (Macedonia)

Author keywords

Architecture; Conceptual design; E learning; E learning systems; LCMS; System modules

Indexed keywords

CHLORINE COMPOUNDS; EDUCATION; LEARNING SYSTEMS; MANAGEMENT; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; QUEUEING NETWORKS; SOFTWARE DESIGN;

ARCHITECTURE; CONCEPTUAL DESIGN; E-LEARNING; E-LEARNING SYSTEMS; EUROPEAN; IN-HOUSE DEVELOPMENTS; ITS ARCHITECTURE; LCMS; LEARNING CONTENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM; RAPID CHANGES; RESEARCH PROJECTS; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT; SYSTEM MODULES; TEACHING AND LEARNING;

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT;

EID: 48849113693     PISSN: 17900832     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Abazi-Bexheti, L., Dika, Z., A study on evaluation papers and surveys about Learning Content Management Systems, Proceedings of the 7th WSEAS International Conference, SEPADS, UK, 2008,. 158-162
2. Abazi-Bexheti, L., LCMS: Design, Development and Implementation, Proceedings of the WSEAS Applied Computing Conference, Instanbul, Turkey, 2008, 367-372
3. Britain S, Liber O. A Framework for Pedagogical Evaluation of Virtual Learning Environments. JISC; 2004. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded documents/
4. Chavan A. Seven Criteria for Evaluating Open-Source Content Management Systems. Linux Journal Website, 2005. http://www.linuxjournal.com/node/ 8301 [17/1/2005]
5. COL LMS Open Source. Report 2003. Commonwealth of Learning from 3waynet Inc. June 2003. http://www.col.org/colweb/webdav/sit.e/myj ahiasite/ shared/docs/03LMSOpenSource.pdf [2/13/2007]
6. Dixon MC, Barreto S. Evaluating VirtualLearning Environments: what are we measuring? Electronic Journal of e- Learning2003; 1 (1): 11-20.
7. Donham P. Ten Rules for Evaluating OpenSource Software. Point of view paper, Collaborative consulting, 2004. http:// www.collaborativeconsulting.com/files/File/ 10%20Ruies%20for%200pen%20Source%20Software.pdf [1/2/2007]
8. Eckerson, Wayne W. Three Tier Client/Server Architecture: Achieving Scalability, Performance, and Efficiency in Client Server Applications, 2000, http://www.sei.cmu.edu/str/descriptions/threetier.html
9. Ferl Web Site. Evaluating Learning Platforms; 2005. http:// ferl.becta.org.uk/display.cfm?page=461 [2/13/2007]
10. Garett, J.J., Ajax: A New Approach to Web Applications, 2005, http:// adaptivepath.com/ideas/essays/archives/000385.php
11. Graf S, List B. An Evaluation of Open Source E-Learning Platforms Stressing Adaptation Issues. In: Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE international Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies; 2005 July05-08. ICALT. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC; 2005. p. 163-165.
12. IDC- International Data Corporation, 2004, http://www.idc.com
13. Kadriu, A., Abazi-Bexheti, L., ICT at South East European University, Proceeding s of the 28th International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces, Cavtat/Dubrovnik, 2006, 271-275.
14. Laurillard D. Rethinking University Teaching - a framework for the effective use of educational technology. London: Routledge; 1993.
15. Lewis BA, MacEntee VM. Learning Management Systems Comparison. In:Proccedings of the 2005 Informing Science and IT Education Joint Conference(InSITE2005); 2005. http://proceedings.informingscience.org/ InSITE2005/P03f55Lewis.pdf [2/13/2007]
16. Microsoft Developer Network. Three-tier Application Model, 2008, http:// msdn2. microsoft.com/enus/library/aa480455.aspx
17. Paulsen, M. F. Online Education Systems: Discussion and Definition of Terms, 2002, http://www.groupsystems.com/products/co gnito.htm