Bipolarity in human reasoning and affective decision making

International Journal of Intelligent Systems

Volumn 23, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 898-922

  Neves, Rui Da Silva ^a   Livet, Pierre ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

^b University Aix Marseille 1   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

BIVARIATE; EXPECTED UTILITY; HUMAN REASONING; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; NEGATIVE INFORMATION; POSSIBILISTIC ANALYSIS;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 48849113307     PISSN: 08848173     EISSN: 1098111X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/int.20299     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Dubois D, Hajek P, Prade H. Knowledge-driven versus data-driven logics. J Logic Language Inform 2000;9:65-89.
2. Dubois D, Lang L, Prade H. Possibilistic logic. In: Gabbay DM, Hogger CJ, Robinson JA, Nute D, editors. Handbook of logic in artificial intelligence and logic programming. New York: Oxford University Press; 1994. vol 3, pp 439-513.
3. Johnson-Laird 83
4. Bar-Hillel Y, Carnap R. An outline of a theory of semantic information. Technical report no. 247 of the Research Laboratory for Electronics, MIT, 1952.
5. Politzer G, Bonnefon JF. Two varieties of conditionals and two kinds of defeaters help reveal two fundamental types of reasoning. Mind Language, in press.
6. Mill JS. A system of logique, London; 1843. Système de logique. Pierre Mardaga Editeur; 1988 (in French).
7. Kelley HH. Attribution theory in social psychology. In: Levine D, editor. Nebraska symposium on motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press; 1967. pp 192-238.
8. Hilton DJ. Logic and causal attribution. In: Hilton DJ, editor. Contemporary science and natural explanation: Commonsense conceptions of causality. Brighton, UK: Harvester Press; New York: New York University Press; 1988.
9. Poletiek F. Hypothesis-testing behaviour. Hove, UK: Psychology Press; 2001.
10. Mackie JL. The cement of the universe. A study of causation. New York: Oxford University Press; 1974.
11. Wason PC. On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Q J Exp Psychol 1960;12:129-140.
12. Popper KR. Logik der forschung, Vienne: Springer-Verlag; 1935. La logique de la découverte scientifique. Paris: Payot; 1973 (in French).
13. R. Carnap (1936-1937). Testability and meaning. Philosophy of Science, 3, 420-468; 4, 1-40.
14. McDonald J. Some situational determinants of hypothesis testing strategies. J Exp Social Psychol 1990;26:255-274.
15. Kareev Y, Halberstadt N, Shafir D. Improving performance and increasing the use of non-positive testing in a rule-discovery task. Q J Exp Psychol A 1993;46(4):729-742.
16. Klayman J. Varieties of confirmation bias. In: Busemeyer J, Medin D, Hastie R, editors. Decision making from a cognitive perspective, the psychology of learning and motivation. New York: Academic Press; 1995. vol 32, 385-418.
17. Klayman J, Ha YW. Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing. Psychol Rev 1987;94(2):211-228.
18. Wetherick NE. Eliminative and enumerative behavior in a conceptual task. Q J Exp Psychol 1962;14:246-249.
19. Da Silva Neves RM, Raufaste E. A psychological study of bipolarity in the possibilistic framework. In: Proc 10th Int Conf on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems (IPMU 2004); 2004. pp 975-981.
20. Gilovich T, Griffin D, Kahneman D. Heuristics and biases. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2002.
21. Kahneman D, Tversky A. (editors.) Choices, values and frames. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
22. Loomes G, Sugden R. Regret theory; an alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. Econ J 1982;92(368):805-824.
23. Zeelenberg M. Anticipated regret, expected feedback and behavioral decision making. J Behav Decis Making 1999;12:93-106.
24. Decision Making 12:93-106.