A self-measurement device suitable for hospital use: Validation of the Spengler Pro m according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension

Blood Pressure Monitoring

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 183-186

  De Greeff, Annemarie ^a   Ahmed, Na'eem ^a   Sheppard, Edward ^a   Shennan, Andrew H ^a,b  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b ST THOMAS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adults; Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation; Blood pressure; International Protocol; Oscillometry; Validation

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARM CIRCUMFERENCE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; MALE; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; MEDICAL SOCIETY; OSCILLOMETRIC UPPER ARM DEVICE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF EXAMINATION; SPHYGMOMANOMETRY; STETHOSCOPE; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; VALIDATION PROCESS; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; INSTRUMENTATION; MIDDLE AGED; MONITOR; OSCILLOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BLOOD PRESSURE DETERMINATION; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSCILLOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 48849106423     PISSN: 13595237     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e3282f7692d     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Mendis S, Lindholm LH, Mancia G, Whitworth J, Alderman M, Lim S, et al. World Health Organization (WHO) and International Society of Hypertension (ISH) risk prediction charts: assessment of cardiovascular risk for prevention and control of cardiovascular disease in low and middleincome countries. J Hypertens 2007; 25:1578-1582.
2. Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, Peto R, Collins R. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet 2002; 360:1903-1913.
3. O'Brien E, Petrie J, Littler W, de Swiet M, Padfield P, Altman D, et al. The British Hypertension Society protocol for the evaluation of blood pressure measuring devices. J Hypertens 1993; 11 (Suppl 2): S43-S62.
4. O'Brien E, Pickering T, Asmar R, Myers M, Parati G, Staessen J, et al. Working group on blood pressure monitoring of the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol for validation of blood pressure measuring devices in adults. Blood Press Monit 2002; 7:3-17.
5. Wilton A, De GA, Shennan A. Rapid assessment of blood pressure in the obstetric day unit using Microlife MaM technology. Hypertens Pregnancy 2007; 26:31-37.
6. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1:307-310.
7. Cuckson AC, Reinders A, Shabeeh H, Shennan AH. Validation of the Microlife BP 3BTO-A oscillometric blood pressure monitoring device according to a modified British Hypertension Society protocol. Blood Press Monit 2002; 7:319-324.
8. Reinders A, Cuckson AC, Lee JT, Shennan AH. An accurate automated blood pressure device for use in pregnancy and pre-eclampsia: the Microlife 3BTO-A. BJOG 2005; 112:915-920.
9. Topouchian JA, El Assaad MA, Orobinskaia LV, El Feghali RN, Asmar RG. Validation of two devices for self-measurement of brachial blood pressure according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension: the SEINEX SE-9400 and the Microlife BP 3AC1-1. Blood Press Monit 2005; 10:325-331.
10. Van Ittersum FJ, Wijering RM, Lambert J, Donker AJ, Stehouwer CD. Determinants of the limits of agreement between the sphygmomanometer and the SpaceLabs 90207 device for blood pressure measurement in health volunteers and insulin-dependent diabetic patients. J Hypertens 1998; 16:1125-1130.