Deed types, house prices and mortgage interest rates

Real Estate Economics

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 587-610

  Brasington, David M ^a   Sarama Jr , Robert F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 48849105025     PISSN: 10808620     EISSN: 15406229     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6229.2008.00223.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Anselin, L. 1988. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. London : Kluver.
2. Archer, W.R., D.H. Gatzlaff and D.C. Ling. 1996. Measuring the Importance of Location in House Price Appreciation. Journal of Urban Economics 40 : 334 353.
3. Barry, R. and R.K. Pace. 1999. A Monte Carlo Estimator of the Log Determinant of Large Sparse Matrices. Linear Algebra and its Applications 289 : 41 54.
4. Brasington, D.M. and D.R. Haurin. 2006. Educational Outcomes and House Values: A Test of the Value-Added Approach. Journal of Regional Science 46 : 245 268.
5. Brasington, D.M. and D. Hite. 2005. Demand for Environmental Quality: A Spatial Hedonic Analysis. Regional Science and Urban Economics 35 : 57 82.
6. Case, K.E. and R.J. Shiller. 1988. The Behavior of Home Buyers in Boom and Post-Boom Markets. New England Economic Review November/December : 29 46.
7. Colwell, P.F. and A. Yavas. 1993. The Value of Deed Quality. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 7 : 143 150.
8. FARES: First American Real Estate Solutions. 2002. CRG Order 03172. Cincinnati, OH.
9. GeoLytics. 2000. GeoLytics Crime Reports CD 1.0. East Brunswick, NJ.
10. GeoLytics. 2002. GeoLytics CensusCD 2000 Long Form Release 2.0. East Brunswick, NJ.
11. Haurin, D.R. and D. Brasington. 1996. School Quality and Real House Prices: Intra- and Interjurisdictional Effects. Journal of Housing Economics 5 : 351 368.
12. Hite, D. 2005. Transaction Types as Neighborhood Quality Indicators in Hedonic House Price Models. Working Paper. Auburn University Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology : Auburn, AL.
13. Hite, D. W. Chern, F. Hitzhusen and A. Randall. 2001. Property-Value Impacts of an Environmental Disamenity: The Case of Landfills. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 22 : 185 202.
14. Lacombe, D. 2004. Does Econometric Methodology Matter? An Analysis of Public Policy Using Spatial Econometric Techniques. Geographical Analysis 36 : 105 118.
15. LeSage, J.P. 1997. Bayesian Estimation of Spatial Autoregressive Models. International Regional Science Review 20 : 113 129.
16. LeSage, J.P. 1999. The Theory and Practice of Spatial Econometrics. Available at http://www.spatial-econometrics.com.
17. LeSage, J.P. 2004. Econometrics Toolbox. Available at http://www.spatial-econometrics.com.
18. Ohio Department of Education. 2002. EMIS Interactive Local Report Card School Year 2000-2001 District Level Data. Columbus, OH.
19. Ohio Department of Taxation. 2000. 2000 Real Property Abstract by School District. Columbus, OH.
20. Ohio Department of Taxation. 2002. Demographic Characteristics of 1999 Income Tax Returns Filed by School District. Columbus, OH.
21. Ohio Department of Taxation. 2003. 2000 Millage Rates by School District. Columbus, OH.
22. Pace, R.K. 2003. Spatial Statistics Toolbox 2.0. FDELW2.m.
23. Pace, R.K. and R.P. Barry. 1998. Simulating Mixed Regressive Spatially Autoregressive Estimators. Computational Statistics 13 : 397 418.
24. Pace, R.K. and J.P. LeSage. 2006. Interpreting Spatial Econometric Models. Working Paper. Louisiana State University Department of Finance : Baton Rouge, LA.
25. Ries, J. and T. Somerville. 2004. School Quality and Residential Property Values: Evidence from Vancouver Rezoning. Working Paper. University of British Columbia : Vancouver, B.C.
26. Riley, J.G. and W. Samuelson. 1981. Optimal Auctions. American Economic Review 71 : 381 392.
27. Ross, S. and J. Yinger. 1999. Sorting and Voting: A Review of the Literature on Urban Public Finance. P. Cheshire and E.S. Mills, editors. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics. Amsterdam : North-Holland.
28. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2002. TRI On-Site and Off-Site Reported Releases (in Pounds), for Facilities in All Industries, for All Chemicals, Ohio, 2000.