The costs of single species programmes and the budget constraint

Pacific Conservation Biology

Volumn 14, Issue 1-2, 2008, Pages 108-118

  Moran, Emma ^a   Cullen, Ross ^a   Hughey, Kenneth F D ^a  

^a LINCOLN UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Budget constraint; Costs; Expenditure; Threatened species

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; ENDANGERED SPECIES; ESTIMATION METHOD; EXPENDITURE; SPECIES CONSERVATION;

AUSTRALASIA; NEW ZEALAND;

EID: 48849101512     PISSN: 10382097     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1071/pc080108     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Brown, L. 1993. The new shorter Oxford English dictionary on historical principles. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
2. Bell, B. D., 1986. The conservation status of New Zealand wildlife. N.Z. Wildlife Service Occasional Publication, No. 12.
3. Cullen, R., Fairburn G. A. and Hughey, K. F. D., 2001. Measuring the productivity of threatened species programmes. Ecological Economics 39: 53-66.
4. Cullen, R., Moran, E. M. and Hughey, K. F. D., 2005. Measuring the success and cost effectiveness of New Zealand multiple species projects to conservation of threatened species. Ecological Economics 53: 311-23.
5. Department of Conservation (DoC). 2004. Annual report: for the year ended 30 June 2004. Department of Conservation, Wellington.
6. Department of Conservation (DoC), and Ministry for the Environment (MfF) 2000. The New Zealand Biodiversity Strategy: our chance to turn the tide; whakakohukihukitia te tai roroku. ki te tai oranga. Department of Conservation and Ministry for the Environment, Wellington.
7. Doerksen, H., Leff, C. S. and Simon, B. M. 1998. Policy goals for endangered species recovery. Society and Matural Resources 11: 365-73.
8. Fairburn, G., Hughey, K. F. D. and Cullen, R., 2004. Cost effectiveness of endangered species management: the Kokako (Calleas cinerea) in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 28: 83-91.
9. Hitchmough, R. 2002. New Zealand Threat Classification System lists 2002. Threatened Species Occasional Publication, 23. Department of Conservation, Wellington.
10. Main, M. B., Roka, F. M. and Noss, R. F. 1998. Evaluating costs of conservation. Conservation Biology 13:1262-272.
11. Metrick, A. and Weitzman, M. L. 1996. Patterns of behavior in endangered species preservation. Land Economics 72: 1-15.
12. Molloy, J., Bell, B. D., Clout, M., de Lange, P., Gibbs, G., Given, D., Norton, D., Smith, N., and Stephens, T 2002. Classifying species according to threat of extinction: a system for New Zealand. Threatened Species Occasional Publication, 22. Department of Conservation, Wellington.
13. Restani, M., and Marzhiff, J. M., 2001. Avian conservation under the Endangered Species Act: expenditures versus recovery priorities. Conservation Biology 15: 1292-300.
14. Simon, B. M., Leff, C. S. and Doerksen, H., 1995. Allocating scarce resources for endangered species recovery. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 14: 415-32.
15. Swanson, T. M., 1994. The economics of extinction revisited and revized: a generalized framework for the analysis of the problems of endangered species and biodiversity losses. Oxford Economic Papers 46: 800-21.
16. Towns, D. R., and Williams, M. 1993. Single species conservation in New Zealand: towards a redefined conceptual approach. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 23: 61-78.
17. Wilcove, D. S., and Chen, L. Y., 1998. Management costs for endangered species. Conservation Biology 12: 1405-407.
18. Williams, M. J., 1986. Native bird management. Forest and Bird 17 (November): 7-9.
19. World Conservation Union (IUCN) Species Survival Commission 2000. 2000 IUCN Red List of threatened species: confirming the global extinction crisis. www.iucn.org/redlist/2000/news.html