-
3
-
-
84918427002
-
-
5 U.S.C. § 552 (1966), as amended.
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
84918427001
-
-
20 U.S.C. § 1232(g) (1974).
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
84918427000
-
-
5 U.S.C. § 552a (1974).
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
84918426999
-
-
5 U.S.C., Appendix 1 (1972).
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
84918426998
-
-
5 U.S.C. § 552b (1976).
-
-
-
-
11
-
-
84918426996
-
-
11. In two of these countries, the access law preceded the Freedom of Information Act. Sweden's law dates from 1766 and Finland's was enacted in 1951. Denmark and Norway passed their laws in 1970.
-
-
-
-
13
-
-
0038931922
-
-
See also, Harper Colophon Books, New York, This volume includeschapters on Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Norway, Belgium, France, United Kingdom, West Germany, Hungary, Yugoslavia, Canada, and the United States.
-
(1977)
Government Secrecy in Democracies
-
-
Galnoor1
-
14
-
-
84918417487
-
Business, Trade Secrets, and Information Access Policy Developments in Other Countries: An Overview
-
For the most recent analysis see
-
(1982)
Administrative Law Review
, vol.34
, pp. 315-369
-
-
Relyea1
-
16
-
-
84918381727
-
Open Government Statutes: The Press Fights for the Right to Know
-
See Note
-
(1962)
Harvard Law Review
, vol.75
, pp. 1202
-
-
-
19
-
-
84970474682
-
Let the Sunshine In: Open Meeting Legislation Can Be Our Key to Closed Doors in State and Local Government
-
For a comparative look at state open meeting laws see
-
(1973)
Northwestern Law Review
, vol.68
, pp. 480-502
-
-
Wickham1
-
21
-
-
84918379198
-
-
See also materials on state laws submitted by David Cohen, president of Common Cause, to the Subcommittee on Government Information and Individual Rights of the House Committee on Government Operations, in, 94th Congress, 1st session
-
(1975)
Government in the Sunshine, Hearings
, pp. 323-339
-
-
U.S. Congress, House, Committee on Government Operations,1
-
22
-
-
84918384963
-
Open Door Laws: An Appraisal of Open Meeting Legislation in Indiana
-
Many individual state laws have been examined in detail in articles in law journals. See, for example
-
(1980)
Valparasio University Law Review
, vol.14
, pp. 295-327
-
-
Pitts1
-
23
-
-
84918373081
-
Minnesota Open Meeting Law After Twenty Years — A Second Look
-
Note
-
(1979)
William Milchell Law Review
, vol.5
, pp. 375-419
-
-
-
28
-
-
84918426994
-
-
5 U.S.C. § 552b (2).
-
-
-
-
29
-
-
84918426993
-
-
5 U.S.C. § 552b (2).
-
-
-
-
30
-
-
84918426992
-
-
5 U.S.C. § 552b (a) (2).
-
-
-
-
31
-
-
84918426991
-
-
5 U.S.C. § 552b (e) (3). The legislation allows some agencies to close meetings through an expedited closing procedure when necessary.
-
-
-
-
32
-
-
84918426990
-
-
5 U.S.C. § 552b (c).
-
-
-
-
33
-
-
84918426989
-
-
5 U.S.C. § 552b (f) (1–2).
-
-
-
-
34
-
-
84918426988
-
-
5 U.S.C. § 552b (h) (1).
-
-
-
-
35
-
-
84918426987
-
-
5 U.S.C. § 552b (i).
-
-
-
-
38
-
-
84918426984
-
Industry and the profession of medicine: balancing appropriate relationships with the need for innovation.
-
Study reprinted in, Hearings before the Subcommittee on Federal Spending Practices and Open Government, 95th Congress, 1st and 2d sessions
-
(1977)
J Vasc Surg
, pp. 395
-
-
U.S. Congress, Senate, Committee on Governmental Affairs,1
-
39
-
-
84918426983
-
-
One important difference is that the Library of Congress study relied only on meeting notices published in the Federal Register. Under the expedited closing procedure available to some agencies, however, meeting notices are often not published in this document. As a result, the Library of Congress study probably overstates the extent of agency openness.
-
-
-
-
40
-
-
84918426982
-
-
The three month figure is based on records from Common Cause, “Shadows Over the Sunshine Act.”
-
-
-
-
41
-
-
84918426981
-
-
Interview of House Speaker Thomas P. O'Neill by Joseph McCaffrey, WMAL Radio Correspondent, Washington, D.C., July 30, 1981.
-
-
-
|