Epistemic responsibility: A dilemma

Monist

Volumn 85, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 398-414

  Hetherington, Stephen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 48749113085     PISSN: 00269662     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5840/monist200285322     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. "Internalism Exposed," The Journal of Philosophy 96 (1999), 271-93, pp. 272-74
2. Warrant: The Current Debate (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993), ch. 1
3. Linda Zagzebski's Virtues of the Mind (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996)
4. Richard Feldman "The Ethics of Belief," Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (2000), 667-95
5. John Martin Fischer, "Recent Work on Moral Responsibility," Ethics 110 (1999), 93-139
6. Michael Stocker, "Responsibility Especially for Beliefs," Mind 91 (1982), 398-417
7. Harry Frankfurt, "What We Are Morally Responsible For," in The Importance of What We Care About (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), p. 95
8. Frankfurt's "Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility," The Journal of Philosophy 66 (1969), 829-39, pp. 835-36
9. "Doxastic Agency," Philosophical Studies 43 (1983), 355-64, p. 363
10. "Concepts of Epistemic Justification," in Epistemic Justification (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1989), p. 93
11. "Freedom in Belief and Desire," The Journal of Philosophy 93 (1996), 429-49, p. 444
12. Freedom Within Reason (New York: Oxford University Press, 1990)
13. A version of this paper was presented to an audience at UNSW. The discussion on that occasion was very helpful, as have been Ward Jones's editorial suggestions