Refining predictions of climate change impacts on plant species distribution through the use of local statistics

Ecological Informatics

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 228-236

  Foody, G M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

AUC ROC comparison; Bioclimate envelope model; Climatic change; Geographically weighted regression; Probabilistic modeling; Related samples

Indexed keywords

BIOCLIMATOLOGY; CLIMATE CHANGE; CLIMATE EFFECT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DATA SET; DICOTYLEDON; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EURASIA; EUROPE; UNITED KINGDOM; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 48749098066     PISSN: 15749541     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2008.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Akcakaya H.R., Butchart S.H.M., Mace G.M., Stuart S.N., and Hilton-Taylor C. Use and misuse of the IUCN Red List Criteria in projecting climate change impacts on biodiversity. Global Change Biology 12 (2006) 2037-2043
2. Araujo M.B., Whittaker R.J., Ladle R.J., and Erhard M. Reducing uncertainty in projections of extinction risk from climate change. Global Ecology and Biogeography 14 (2005) 529-538
3. Austin M. Species distribution models and ecological theory: a critical assessment and some possible new approaches. Ecological Modelling 200 (2007) 1-19
4. Berry P.M., Dawson T.P., Berry P.A., and Harrison P.A. SPECIES: a spatial evaluation of climate impacts on the envelope of species. Ecological Modelling 154 (2002) 289-300
5. Botkin D.B., Saxe H., Araujo M.B., Betts R., Bradshaw R.H.W., Cedhagen T., Chesson P., Dawson T.P., Etterson J.R., Faith D.P., Ferrier S., Guisan A., Hansen A.S., Hilbert D.W., Loehle C., Margules C., New M., Sobel M.J., and Stockwell D.R.B. Forecasting the effects of global warming on biodiversity. Bioscience 57 (2007) 227-236
6. Brooker R.W., Travis J.M.J., Clark E.J., and Dytham C. Modelling species' range shifts in a changing climate: the impacts of biotic interactions, dispersal distance and the rate of climate change. Journal of Theoretical Biology 245 (2007) 59-65
7. DeLong E.R., DeLong D.M., and Clarke-Pearson D.L. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristics curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44 (1988) 837-845
8. Dorman C.F. Effects of incorporating spatial autocorrelation into the analysis of species distribution data. Global Ecology and Biogeography 16 (2007) 129-138
9. Ellis C.J., Coppins B.J., and Dawson T.P. Predicted response of the lichen epiphyte Lecanora populicola to climate change scenarios in a clean-air region of Northern Britain. Biological Conservation 135 (2007) 396-404
10. Fleiss J.L., Levin B., and Paik M.C. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. 3rd edition (2003), Wiley, New Jersey
11. Foody G.M. Spatial nonstationarity and scale-dependency in the relationship between species diversity and environmental determinants for the sub-Saharan endemic avifauna. Global Ecology and Biogeography 13 (2004) 315-320
12. Fotheringham A.S., Brunsdon C., and Charlton M. Geographically Weighted Regression. The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships (2002), Wiley, Chichester
13. Garzon M.B., de Dios R.S., and Ollero H.S. Predictive modelling of tree species distributions on the Iberian Peninsula during the last glacial maximum and mid-Holocene. Ecography 30 (2007) 120-134
14. Hamann M.L., and Wang T.L. Potential effects of climate change on ecosystem and tree species distribution in British Columbia. Ecology 87 (2006) 2773-2786
15. Hampe A. Bioclimate envelope models: what they detect and what they hide. Global Ecology and Biogeography 13 (2004) 469-471
16. Heikkinen R.K., Luoto M., Araujo M.B., Virkkala R., Thuiller W., and Sykes M.T. Methods and uncertainties in bioclimatic envelope modelling under climate change. Progress in Physical Geography 30 (2006) 751-777
17. Heikkinen R.K., Luoto M., and Virkkala R. Does seasonal fine-tuning of climatic variables improve the performance of bioclimatic envelope models for migratory birds?. Diversity and Distributions 12 (2006) 502-510
18. Hulme M., Jenkins G.J., Lu X., Turnpenny J.R., Mitchell T.D., Jones R.G., Lowe J., Murphy J.M., Hassell D., Boorman P., McDonald R., and Hill S. Climate Change Scenarios for the United Kingdom: The UKCIP02 Scientific Report. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, School of Environmental Sciences (2002), University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK 120pp.
19. Iverson L.R., Schwartz M.W., and Prasad A.M. How fast and far might tree species migrate in the eastern United States due to climate change?. Global Ecology and Biogeography 13 (2004) 209-219
20. Luoto M., Poyry J., Heikkinen R.K., and Saarinen K. Uncertainty of bioclimate envelope models based on the geographical distribution of species. Global Ecology and Biogeography 14 (2005) 575-584
21. Luoto M., Virkkala R., and Heikkinen R.K. The role of land cover in bioclimatic models depends on spatial resolution. Global Ecology and Biogeography 16 (2007) 34-42
22. Osborne P.E., Foody G.M., and Suarez-Seoane S. Non-stationarity and local approaches to modelling the distributions of wildlife. Diversity and Distributions 13 (2007) 313-323
23. Pearson R.G., and Dawson T.P. Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful?. Global Ecology and Biogeography 12 (2003) 361-371
24. Pearson R.G., and Dawson T.P. Bioclimate envelope models: what they detect and what they hide response to Hampe (2004). Global Ecology and Biogeography 13 (2004) 471-473
25. Pearson R.G., Dawson T.P., Berry P.M., and Harrison P.A. SPECIES: a spatial evaluation of climate impact on the envelope of species. Ecological Modelling 154 (2002) 289-300
26. Pearson R.G., Thuiller W., Araujo M.B., Martinez-Meyer E., Brotons L., McClean C., Miles L., Segurado P., Dawson T.P., and Lees D.C. Model-based uncertainty in species range prediction. Journal of Biogeography 33 (2006) 1704-1711
27. Preston C.D., Telfer M.G., Arnold H.R., Carey P.D., Cooper J.M., Dines T.D., Hill M.O., Pearman D.A., Roy D.B., and Smart S.M. The Changing Flora of the UK (2002), DEFRA, London
28. In: Preston C.D., Pearman D.A., and Dines T.D. (Eds). New Atlas of the British and Irish Flora (2002), Oxford University Press, Oxford
29. Shaw, J.W. and Horrace, W., 2001, Comparison of nonparametric receiver operator characteristic analysis with a likelihood-ratio test for model selection, Working paper, available at http://faculty.maxwell.syr.edu/whorrace/workingpapers/vuong.pdf (last accessed 10 October 2007).
30. Toledano A.Y. Three methods for analysing correlated ROC curves: a comparison in real data sets from multi-reader, multi-case studies with a factorial design. Statistics in Medicine 22 (2003) 2919-2933
31. Tsoar, A., Allouche, O., Steinitz, O., Rotem, D., Kadmon, R., 2007. A comparative evaluation of presence-only methods for modelling species distribution, Diversity and Distributions, 13, 397-405.
32. Wang F., and Gatsonis C.A. Hierarchical Models For ROC Curve Summary Measures: Design and Analysis of Multi-reader, Multi-modality Studies Of Medical Tests, Statistics in Medicine, Published On-line 5 March 2007 (2007) 10.1002/sim.2828
33. Zhang L.J., and Shi H.J. Local modeling of tree growth by geographically weighted regression. Forest Science 50 (2004) 225-244