Socioeconomic differentials in performing urinalysis during prenatal care;Diferenciais socioeconomicos na realização de exame de urina no pré-natal

Revista de Saude Publica

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 390-395

  Silveira, Mariângela Freitas ^a,b   Barros, Aluísio J D ^a   Santos, Iná S ^a   Matijasevich, Alicia ^a   Victoria, Cesar G ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PELOTAS   (Brazil)

^b NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Cohort studies; Obstetric labor, premature; Pregnancy; Prenatal care; Socioeconomic factors; Urinalysis

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAZIL; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL CARE; SOCIOECONOMICS; STANDARD; STATISTICS; URINALYSIS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAZIL; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL CARE; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; URINALYSIS;

EID: 48749096826     PISSN: 00348910     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bachman JW, Heise RH, Naessens JM, Timmerman MG. A study of various tests to detect asymptomatic urinary tract infections in an obstetric population, JAMA. 1993;270(16):1971-4.
2. Barros AJ, Santos IS, Victora CC, Albernaz EP, Domingues MR, Timm IK, et al. Coorte de nascimentos de Pelotas, 2004: metodologia e descrição. Rev Saude Publica. 2006;40(3):402-13.
3. Barros AD, Victora CG. Indicador econômico para o Brasil baseado no censo demográfico cle 2000. Rev Saude Publica. 2005; 39(4):523-9.
4. Barros F, Victora CG, Barros A, Santos IS, Albernaz E, Matijasevich A, et al. The challenge of reducing neonatal mortality in Middle-income countries: findings from three Brazilian birth cohorts in 1982, 1993, and 2004. Lancet. 2005;365(9462):847-54.
5. Bhutta ZA, Darmstadt GL, Hasan BS, Haws RA. Community-Based interventions for improving perinatal and neonatal health outcomes in developing countries: a review of the evidence. Pediatrics. 2005;115(2 Suppl):519-617.
6. Coimbra LC, Figueiredo FP, Silva AA, Barbieri MA, Bettiol H, Caldas AJ, Mochel EG, Ribeiro VS. Inadequate utilization of prenatal care in two Brazilian birth cohorts. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2007;40(9):1195-202.
7. Facchini LA. Trabalho materno e ganho de peso infantil. Pelotas: Editora Universitária UFPel; 1995.
8. Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement. Routine prenatal care. Bloomington; 2006.
9. Pastore LM, Savitz DA, Thorp Jr JM, Koch GG, Hertz-Picciotto I, Irwin DE. Predictors of symptomatic urinary tract infection after 20 weeks gestation. J Perinatol. 1999;19(7):488-93.
10. Quadros CAT, Victora CG, Costa JSD. Coverage and focus of a cervical cancer prevention program in southern Brazil. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2004;16(4):223-32.
11. Romero R, Oyarzun E, Mazor M, Sirtori M, Hobbins JC, Bracken M. Meta-analysis of the relationship between asymptomatic bacteriuria and preterm delivery/low birth weight. Obstet Gynecol. 1989;73(4):576-82.
12. Serruya SJ, Lago TDG, Cecatti JG. O panorama da atenção pré-natal no Brasil e o Programa de Humanização do Pré-natal e Nascimento. Rev Bras Saude Matern Infant. 2004; 4(3):269-79.
13. Silveira DS, Santos IS, Costa JSD. Atenção pré-natal na rede básica: uma avaliação da estrutura e do processo. Cad Saude Publica. 2001;17(1):131-9.
14. Smaill F, Vazquez JC. Antibiotics for asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Systematic Rev. 2007;(2): CD000490. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000490.pub2.
15. Vasquez JC, Villar J. Treatments for symptomatic urinary tract infections during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(4):CD002256. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002256.