Corrigendum to "Evaluating ESL: Making sense of university professors' responses to second language writing" [J. Second Lang. Writing 17 (3) (2008) 125-143] (DOI:10.1016/j.jslw.2007.10.002);Evaluating ESL: Making sense of university professors' responses to second language writing

Journal of Second Language Writing

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 125-143

  Roberts, Felicia ^a   Cimasko, Tony ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

English for Academic Purposes; Error gravity; Reader response; Writer identity

Indexed keywords

EID: 48749096324     PISSN: 10603743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2008.12.001     Document Type: Erratum

References (48)

1. Aigner D., and Thum F. On student evaluation of teaching ability. Journal of Economic Education 17 (1986) 243-265
2. Baruch Y. Response rate in academic studies: A comparative analysis. Human Relations 52 (1999) 421-438
3. Beason L. Ethos and error: How business people react to errors. College Composition and Communication 53 1 (2001) 33-64
4. Bellas M.L. Comparable worth in academia: The effects on faculty salaries of the sex composition and labor-market conditions of academic disciplines. American Sociological Review 59 6 (1994) 807-821
5. Bradac J.J. Language attitudes and impression formation. In: Giles H., and Robinson W.P. (Eds). The handbook of language and social psychology (1990), John Wiley & Sons 387-412
6. Bradac J.J., Cargile A.C., and Hallett J.S. Language attitudes: Retrospect, conspect, and prospect. In: Robinson W.P., and Giles H. (Eds). The new handbook of language and social psychology (2001), John Wiley & Sons 137-155
7. Brown B.L., Giles H., and Thakerer J.N. Speaker evaluations as a function of speech rate, accent and context. Language & Communication 5 3 (1985) 207-220
8. Callan V., and Gallois C. Ethnic stereotypes: Australian and Southern European youth. The Journal of Social Psychology 119 (1983) 287-298
9. Chastain K. Native speaker reaction to instructor-identified student second language errors. Modern Language Journal 64 (1980) 210-215
10. Clayton M. Foreign teaching assistants' first test: The accent. Christian Science Monitor 92 198 (2000) 14
11. Crompton P. "Where," "In which," and "In that": A corpus-based approach to error analysis. RELC Journal 36 2 (2005) 157-176
12. Delamere, T. (1986). The role of stereotyping in native speaker judgments of English as a second language learners' performance. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Florida State University.
13. Delisle H.H. Native speaker judgment and the evaluation of errors in German. Modern Language Journal 66 (1982) 39-48
14. Eisenstein M. Native reactions to non-native speech: A review of empirical research. SSLA 5 2 (1983) 160-176
15. Engber C. The relationship of lexical proficiency to the quality of ESL compositions. Journal of Second Language Writing 4 2 (1995) 139-155
16. Fishman G., Rattner A., and Weiman G. The effect of ethnicity on crime attribution. Criminology 25 (1987) 507-524
17. Guntermann G. A study of the frequency and communicative effects of errors in Spanish. The Modern Language Journal 62 (1978) 249-253
18. Gynan S.N. Comprehension, irritation and error hierarchies. Hispania 68 (1985) 160-165
19. Haddal C.C. Foreign students in the United States: Policies and legislation (2007), Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC
20. Hairston M. Not all errors are created equal: Nonacademic readers in the professions respond to lapses in usage. College English 43 8 (1981) 794-806
21. In: Harklau L., Losey K.M., and Siegal M. (Eds). Generation 1.5 meets college composition (1999), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 191-210
22. Janopoulos M. Reader comprehension and holistic assessment of second language writing proficiency. Written Communication 6 2 (1989) 218-237
23. Janopoulos M. University faculty tolerance of NS and NNS writing errors: A comparison. Journal of Second Language Writing 1 2 (1992) 109-121
24. Johansson, F. (1978). Studies of error gravity: Native reactions to errors produced by Swedish learners of English. Gothenburg Studies in English 44. Gothenburg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
25. Johnson D.M., and Roen D.H. Complimenting and involvement in peer reviews: Gender variation. Language in Society 21 1 (1992) 27-57
26. Khalil A. Communicative error evaluation: Native speakers' evaluation and interpretation of written errors of Arab EFL learners. TESOL Quarterly 19 2 (1985) 335-351
27. Lambert W.E., Hodgson R., Gardner R.C., and Fillenbaum S. Evaluational reactions to spoken languages. Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology 60 (1960) 44-51
28. Leki I. Coping strategies of ESL students in writing tasks across the curriculum. TESOL Quarterly 29 2 (1995) 235-260
29. Leki I. "A narrow thinking system": Nonnative-English-speaking students in group projects across the curriculum. TESOL Quarterly 35 1 (2001) 39-67
30. Leonard D.J., and Gilsdorf J.W. Language in change: Academics' and executives perceptions of usage errors. Journal of Business Communication 27 1 (1990) 137-158
31. Ludwig J. Native-speaker judgments of second-language learners' efforts at communication: A review. Modern Language Journal 66 (1982) 274-283
32. Magnan S.S. Age and sensitivity to gender in French. SSLA 5 2 (1983) 194-212
33. Moser C.A., and Kalton G. Survey methods in sociological investigation (1979), Heinemann, London
34. Norris T. Nonnative English-speaking teaching assistants and student performance. Research in Higher Education 32 8 (1991) 385-397
35. Piazza L. French tolerance for grammatical errors made by Americans. The Modern Language Journal 64 (1980) 422-427
36. Politzer R.L. Errors of English speakers of German as perceived and evaluated by German natives. Modern Language Journal 62 (1978) 253-261
37. Ranelli P.L., and Nelson J.V. Assessing writing perceptions and practices of pharmacy students. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 62 4 (1998) 426-432
38. Rifkin B., and Roberts F.D. Error gravity: A critical review of research design. Language Learning 45 3 (1995) 511-537
39. Rubin D.L., and Williams-James M. The impact of writer nationality on mainstream teacher's judgments of composition quality. Journal of Second Language Writing 6 2 (1997) 139-153
40. Ryan E.B., and Carranza M.A. Evaluative reactions of adolescents toward speakers of standard English and Mexican American accented English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 31 (1975) 855-863
41. Santos T. Markedness theory and error evaluation: An experimental study. Applied Linguistics 8 3 (1987) 207-218
42. Santos T. Professors' reactions to the academic writing of nonnative-speaking students. TESOL Quarterly 22 1 (1988) 69-90
43. Sheorey R. Error perceptions of native-speaking and non-native-speaking teachers of ESL. ELT Journal 40 4 (1986) 306-312
44. Silva T. Toward an understanding of the distinct nature of second language writing: The ESL research and its implications. TESOL Quarterly 27 4 (1993) 657-677
45. Tomiyana M. Grammatical errors communication breakdown. TESOL Quarterly 14 1 (1980) 71-79
46. Vann R.J., Meyer D.E., and Frederick L.O. Error gravity: A study of faculty opinion of ESL errors. TESOL Quarterly 18 3 (1984) 427-440
47. Williams J.M. The phenomenology of error. College Composition and Communication 32 (1981) 152-168
48. Zamel V. Strangers in academia: The experiences of faculty and ESL students across the curriculum. College Composition and Communication 46 4 (1995) 506-521