Information processing under imprecise risk with an insurance demand illustration

International Journal of Approximate Reasoning

Volumn 49, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 117-129

  Jaffray, Jean Yves ^a   Jeleva, Meglena ^b,c  

^a SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DU MAINE   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PARIS 1 PANTHÉON SORBONNE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENTS; AUTOMOBILES; DECISION THEORY; DECISION TREES; FINANCE; HELIUM; INSURANCE; PROBLEM SOLVING; RISK PERCEPTION; STANDARDS;

AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE; BEST STRATEGY; DECISION MAKER; IMPRECISE PROBABILITIES; INFORMATION PROCESSING; OPTIMAL DECISION RULES; OPTIMAL DECISIONS; RANDOM SAMPLING; RELATIVE FREQUENCIES; SAMPLE SIZES; SEQUENTIAL DECISION MAKING; SUBJECTIVE EXPECTED UTILITY;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 48749096297     PISSN: 0888613X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijar.2007.06.013     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. de Cooman G., and Troffaes M.C.M. Dynamic programming for deterministic discrete-time systems with uncertain gain. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 39 2-3 (2005) 257-278
2. Diecidue E., and Wakker P. Dutch books: avoiding strategic and dynamic complications, and a comonotonic extension. Mathematical Social Sciences 43 (2002) 135-149
3. Dionne G., Doherty N., and Fombaron N. Adverse selection in insurance markets. In: Dionne G. (Ed). Handbook of Insurance (2000), Kluwer Academic Publishers
4. Epstein L., and Schneider M. Recursive multiple priors. Journal of Economic Theory 113 (2003) 1-31
5. E. Hanany, P. Klibanoff, Updating Preferences with Multiple Priors, Working Paper, 2006.
6. Jaffray J.Y., and Nielsen T. Dynamic decision making without expected utility: an operational approach. European Journal of Operational Research 169 1 (2006) 226-246
7. Jaffray J.Y., and Said T. Optimal hypothesis testing with a vague prior. In: Sixto R. (Ed). Decision Theory and Decision Analysis: Trends and Challenges (1994), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands 207-222
8. Levi I. On indeterminate probabilities. Journal of Philosophy 71 13 (1974) 391-418
9. McClennen E. Rationality and Dynamic Choice (1990), Cambridge University Press
10. Machina M. Dynamic consistency and non-expected utility models of choice under uncertainty. Journal of Economic Literature 27 (1989) 1622-1668
11. Quiggin J. A theory of anticipated utility. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3 (1982) 324-343
12. Schick F. Dutch bookies and money pumps. Journal of Philosophy 83 (1986) 112-119
13. Seidenfeld T. A contrast between two decision rules for use with (convex) sets of probabilities: G-maximin versus E-admissibility. Synthèse 140 (2004) 69-88
14. Seidenfeld T., and Wasserman L. Dilation for sets of probabilities. Annals of Statistics (1993)