Legal viability, societal values, and SPOIR: Response to D'Elia et al.

Conservation Biology

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 1075-1077

  Waples, Robin S ^a   Adams, Peter B ^b   Bohnsack, James ^c   Taylor, Barbara L ^b  

^a NORTHWEST FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^b SOUTHWEST FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^c SOUTHEAST FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 48749088981     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: 15231739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00980.x     Document Type: Note

References (12)

1. Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2007. U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16175 (D. Colo. 8 March 2007).
2. Dayton, P. K., M. J. Tegner, P. B. Edwards, and K. L. Riser. 1998. Sliding baselines, ghosts, and reduced expectations in kelp forest communities. Ecological Applications 8 : 309 322.
3. D'Elia, J., M. Zwartjes, and S. McCarthy. 2008. Considering legal viability and societal values when deciding what to conserve under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. Conservation Biology 23 : in press.
4. Defenders of Wildlife v. Norton. 2001. 258 F.3d 1136 (9th Cir.).
5. DeMaster, D., R. Angliss, J. Cochrane, P. Mace, R. Merrick, M. Miller, S. Rumsey, B. Taylor, G. Thompson, and R. Waples. 2004. Recommendations to NOAA Fisheries: ESA listing criteria by the Quantitative Working Group, 10 June 2004. Technical memorandum NMFS-F/SPO-67. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Washington, D.C.
6. Nelson, M. P., J. A. Vucetich, and M. K. Phillips. 2007. Normativity and the meaning of endangered: response to Waples et al. 2007. Conservation Biology 21 : 1646 1648.
7. Office of the Solicitor. 2007. The meaning of "in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range." Memorandum M-37013 from the Solicitor to the Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (16 March). U.S. Department of the Interior, Office of the Solicitor, Washington, D.C. Available from http://www.doi.gov/solicitor/M37013. pdf (accessed May 2008).
8. Pauly, D. 1995. Anecdotes and the shifting baseline syndrome of fisheries. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 10 : 430.
9. Vucetich, J. A., M. P. Nelson, and M. K. Phillips. 2006. The normative dimension and legal meaning of endangered and recovery in the U.S. Endangered Species Act. Conservation Biology 20 : 1383 1390.
10. Waples, R. S. 1995. Evolutionarily significant units and the conservation of biological diversity under the Endangered Species Act. American Fisheries Society Symposium 17 : 8 27.
11. Waples, R. S., P. Adams, J. Bohnsack, and B. L. Taylor. 2007a. A biological framework for evaluating whether an ESA species is threatened or endangered in a "significant portion of its range Conservation Biology 21 : 964 974.
12. Waples, R. S., P. B. Adams, J. Bohnsack, and B. L. Taylor. 2007b. Normativity redux. Conservation Biology 21 : 1649 1650.