University-industry engagement: The formation of the Knowledge Integration Community (KIC) model at the Cambridge-MIT Institute

Research Policy

Volumn 37, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 1241-1254

  Acworth, Edward B ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Commercialization; Knowledge exchange; Knowledge Integration Community; Technology transfer; University industry R D links

Indexed keywords

AIRCRAFT LANDING SYSTEMS; COMPETITION; INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS; MECHANISMS; PLANNING; PROCESS ENGINEERING; PROCESS PLANNING; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; PUBLIC POLICY; RESEARCH; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

CAMBRIDGE; CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY; CASE STUDIES; ECONOMIC COMPETITIVENESS; EXPERT CONSULTATION; FUNCTIONAL COMPONENTS; KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY; KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE; KNOWLEDGE INTEGRATION; KNOWLEDGE SHARING; MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (MIT); ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURES; RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS; RESEARCH PROJECTS; SILENT AIRCRAFT; STAKEHOLDER GROUPS; STRATEGIC PLANNING PROCESS;

PAPER COATING;

ARCHIVAL PAPERS; COATINGS; COMPETITION; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PAPER; PLANNING; RESEARCH; TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 48749086524     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.022     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Acworth E., Crawley E., and Kelly M. A strategic planning process for organizations at the university-industry interface, Paper no. 1289. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference for the International Association of Management of Technology Conference. April 4-7, 2004, Washington, DC (2004)
2. Aldrich H.E., and von Glinow M.A. Business start-ups: the HRM imperative. In: Birley S., and MacMillan I.C. (Eds). International Perspectives on Entrepreneurial Research (1992), North-Holland, New York 233-253
3. BankBoston, 1997. MIT: the impact of innovation. BankBoston Economics Department Special Report, Boston, MA. Retrieved from MIT web site: http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/founders/ (accessed August 9, 2007).
4. Callon M. Is science a public good?. Science, Technology and Human Values 19 (1994) 395-424
5. Di Gregorio D., and Shane S. Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others?. Research Policy 32 2 (2003) 209-227
6. Etzkowitz H. Knowledge as property-the Massachusetts-Institute-of-Technology and the debate over academic patent policy. Minerva 32 4 (1994) 383-421
7. Etzkowitz H. MIT and the Rise of Entrepreneurial Science (2002), Routledge, London/New York
8. Etzkowitz H., and Klofsten M. The innovating region: toward a theory of knowledge-based regional development. R&D Management 35 3 (2005) 243-255
9. Fontana R., Geuna A., and Matt M. Factors affecting university-industry R&D projects: the importance of searching, screening and signaling. Research Policy 35 2 (2006) 309-323
10. Gill D., Minshall M.R., and Campbell B. Lessons from America. Funding Technology (2000) 2-59
11. Gill D., Minshall M.R., and Campbell B. Israel and the virtues of necessity. Funding Technology (2002) 2-69
12. Her Majesty's Treasury, 2002. Investing in innovation: a strategy for science, engineering and technology.
13. Howells J. Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Research Policy 35 5 (2006) 715-728
14. King D.A. The scientific impact of nations. Nature 430 (2004) 311
15. Lecuyer C. Academic science and technology in the service of industry: MIT creates a 'permeable' engineering school. American Economic Review 88 2 (1998) 28-33
16. Lecuyer C. What do universities really owe industry? The case of solid state electronics at Stanford. Minerva 43 1 (2005) 51-71
17. Lecuyer C. Making Silicon Valley: Innovation and the Growth of High Tech (2006), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA/London pp. 1930-1970
18. Lynn L.H., Reddy N.M., and Aram J.D. Linking technology and institutions: the innovation community framework. Research Policy 25 (1996) 91-106
19. Mowery D.C., and Shane S. Introduction to the special issue on university entrepreneurship and technology transfer. Management Science 48 1 (2002) V-VX
20. O'Shea R.P., Allen T.J., Chevalier A., and Roche F. Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. Universities. Research Policy 34 7 (2005) 994-1009
21. O'Shea R.P., Allen T.J., Morse K.P., O'Gorman C., and Roche F. Delineating the anatomy of an entrepreneurial university: the Massachusetts Institute of Technology experience. R&D Management 37 1 (2007) 1-16
22. Porter M. UK Competitiveness: Moving to the Next Stage (2003), Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA
23. Roberts, G., 2002. SET for success: the supply of science, technical and engineering skills. Retrieved from HMT web site: http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk./Documents/Enterprise_and_Productivity/Research_and_Enterprise/ent_res_roberts.cfm (accessed February 26, 2006).
24. Seaton R.A.F., and Cordey-Hayes M. The development and application of interactive models of industrial technology transfer. Technovation 13 (1993) 45-53
25. Stokes D. Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation (1996), Brookings, Washington, DC
26. US Council on Competitiveness, 1998. Going global: the new shape of American innovation. Retrieved from http://www.compete.org/pdf/goingglobal.pdf (accessed February 27, 2006).
27. Watkins D., and Horley G. Transferring technology from large to small firms: the role of intermediaries. In: Webb T., Quince T., and Watkins D. (Eds). Small Business Research (1986), Gower, Aldershot 215-251
28. Wright M., Lockett A., Clarysse B., and Binks M. University spin-out companies and venture capital. Research Policy 35 (2006) 481-501