3-T MRI with Phased-array Coil in Local Staging of Prostatic Cancer

Academic Radiology

Volumn 15, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 1118-1125

  Torricelli, Pietro ^a   Barberini, Alessandro ^a   Cinquantini, Francesco ^a   Sighinolfi, Maria ^a   Cesinaro, Anna Maria ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MODENA AND REGGIO EMILIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

3 T MRI; phased array coil; Prostate cancer; staging

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL; CANCER INFILTRATION; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGICAL ANATOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; RADIOLOGIST; RELIABILITY; SEMINAL VESICLE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

AGED; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NEOPLASM STAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 48649107706     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2008.04.010     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Schnall M.D., Imai Y., Tomaszewski J., et al. Prostate cancer: local staging with endorectal surface coil MR imaging. Radiology 178 (1991) 797-802
2. Futterer J.J., Engelbrecht M.R., Hiusman H.J., et al. Staging prostate cancer with dynamic contrast-enhanced endorectal MR imaging prior to radical prostatectomy: experienced versus less experienced readers. Radiology 237 (2005) 541-549
3. Mullerad M., Hricak H., Wang L., et al. Prostate cancer: detection of extracapsular extension by genitourinary and general body radiologists at MR imaging. Radiology 232 (2004) 140-146
4. Quinn S.F., Branzini D.A., Demlow T.A., et al. MR imaging of prostate cancer with an endorectal coil technique: correlation with whole-mount specimens. Radiology 190 (1994) 323-327
5. Werner-Wasik M., Whittington R., Malkowicz S.B., et al. Prostate imaging may not be necessary in nonpalpable carcinoma of the prostate. Urology 50 (1997) 385-389
6. Jager G.J., Severens J.L., Thornbury J.R., et al. Prostate cancer staging: should MR imaging be used? -A decision analytic approach. Radiology 215 (2000) 445-451
7. Presti Jr. J.C., Hricack H., Narayan P.A., et al. Local staging of prostatic carcinoma comparison of transrectal sonography and endorectal MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166 (1996) 103-108
8. Tempany C.M., Zhon X., Zerhouni E.A., et al. Staging of prostate cancer: results of radiology diagnostic oncology group project comparison of three MR imaging techniques. Radiology 192 (1994) 47-54
9. Hirose M., Bharatha A., Hata N., et al. Quantitative MR imaging assessment of prostate gland deformity before and during MR imaging guided brachytherapy. Acad Radiol 9 (2002) 906-912
10. Maio A., and Rifkin M.D. Magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer: Update. Top Magn Reson Imaging 7 (1995) 54-68
11. Rouviere O., Hartman R.P., and Lyonnet D. Prostate MR imaging at high-field strenght: evolution or revolution?. Eur Radiol 16 (2006) 276-284
12. Uematsu H., Takahashi M., Dougherty L., et al. High field body MR imaging preliminary experiences. J Clin Imaging 28 (2004) 159-162
13. Futterer J.J., Scheenen T.W.J., Huisman H.J., et al. Initial experience of 3T endorectal coil MR imaging and 1H-spectroscopic imaging of the prostate. Invest Radiol 39 (2004) 671-680
14. Schick F. Whole body MRI at high field: technical limits and clinical potential. Eur Radiol 15 (2005) 946-959
15. Ocak I., Bernardo M., Metzger L., et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of prostate cancer at 3T: a study of pharmacokinetic parameters. AJR Am J Roentgend 189 (2007) 849-851
16. Bloch B.N., Rofsky N.M., Baroni R.H., et al. 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate with combined pelvic phased-array and endorectal coils: initial experience. Acad Radiol 11 (2003) 863-867
17. Bartha R., Drost D.J., Menon R.S., et al. Comparison of the quantification precision of human short echo time H spectroscopy at 1.5 and 4.0 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 44 (2000) 185-192
18. De Bazelaire C.M.J., Duhamel G.D., Rofsky N.M., et al. MR imaging relaxation times of abdominal and pelvic tissues measured in vivo at 3.0T: preliminary results. Radiology 230 (2004) 652-659
19. Takahashi M., Uematsu H., and Hatabu H. MR imaging at high magnetic fields. Eur J Radiol 46 (2003) 45-52
20. Beyersdorff D., Taymoorian K., Knosel T., et al. MRI of prostate cancer at 1.5 and 3.0 T: comparison of image quality in tumor detection and staging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185 (2005) 1214-1220
21. Sosna J., Pedrosa I., Dewolf W.C., et al. MR imaging of the prostate at 3 Tesla: comparison of an external phased-array coil to imaging with an endorectal coil at 1.5 Tesla. Acad Radiol 11 (2004) 857-862
22. Torricelli P., Cinquantini F., Ligabue G., et al. Comparative evaluation between external phased array coil at 3 T and endorectal coil at 1.5 T. J Comput Assist Tomogr 30 (2006) 355-361
23. D'Amico A., Whittington R., Schnall M., et al. The impact of the inclusion of endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging in a multivariate analysis to predict clinically unsuspected extraprostatic cancer. Cancer 75 (1995) 2368-2372
24. Landis J.R., and Koch G.C. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33 (1977) 159-174
25. Coakley F., Qayyum A., and Kurhanewicz J. Magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopic imaging of prostate cancer. J Urol 170 (2003) 69-75
26. Sala E., Akin O., Moskowitz C.S., et al. Endorectal MR imaging in the evaluation of seminal vesicle invasion: diagnostic accuracy and multivariate feature analysis. Radiology 238 (2006) 929-937
27. Cornud F., Flam T., Chauveinc L., et al. Extraprostatic spread of clinically localized prostate cancer: factors predictive of pT3 tumor and of positive endorectal MR imaging examination results. Radiology 224 (2002) 203-210
28. Manzone T., Malkowicz S.B., Tomaszewski J.E., et al. The use of endorectal MR imaging to predict prostate carcinoma recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Radiology 209 (1998) 537-542
29. Futterer J.J., Heijmink S.W.T.P.J., Scheenen T.W.J., et al. Prostate cancer: local staging at 3-T endorectal MR imaging-Early experience. Radiology 238 (2006) 184-191
30. Stamey T.A., Villers A.A., McNeal J.E., et al. Positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy: importance of the apical dissection. J Urol 143 (1990) 1183-1187
31. Kim C.K., Park B.K., and Kim B. Localization of prostate cancer using 3T MRI. Comparison of T2-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 30 (2006) 7-11
32. D'Amico A., Whittington R., Malkowicz, et al. Role of percent positive biopsies and endorectal coil MRI in predicting prognosis in intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients. Cancer J Sci Am 2 (1996) 343-350
33. Wang L., Mullerad M., Chen H.N., et al. Prostate cancer: incremental value of endorectal MR imaging findings for prediction of extracapsular extension. Radiology 232 (2004) 133-139
34. Sonnad S.S., Langlotz C.P., and Schwartz J.S. Accuracy of MR imaging for staging prostate cancer: a meta-analysis to examine the effect of technologic change. Acad Radiol 8 (2001) 149-157
35. Wang L., Hricak H., Kattan M.W., et al. Prediction of organ-confined prostate cancer: incremental value of MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging to staging nomograms. Radiology 238 (2006) 597-603
36. Yu K.K., Scheidler J., Hricak H., et al. Prostate cancer: prediction of extracapsular extension with endorectal HR imaging and three-dimensional proton MR spectroscopic imaging. Radiology 213 (1999) 481-488