Comparative study between parietal peritoneum suture and nonsuture in midline laparotomies in rats

Acta Cirurgica Brasileira

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 348-351

  Viana, Arildo De Toledo ^a,b   Daud, Fernanda Vasquez ^a   Bonizzia, Andréia ^a   De Barros, Paulo Henrique Fogaça ^a   Gouvêa, Eduardo Sauerbronn ^a  

^a FACULDADE DE CIÊNCIAS MÉDICAS DA SANTA CASA DE SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b Faculty of Medical Sciences Santa Casa of São Paulo ^*  (Brazil)

Author keywords

Adhesions; Peritoneum; Rats; Sutures

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL WALL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CHI SQUARE TEST; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; LAPAROTOMY; MALE; NONHUMAN; PERITONEUM; PERITONEUM ADHESION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; RAT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SUTURING METHOD;

ANIMALS; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; FEMALE; MALE; PERITONEAL DISEASES; PERITONEUM; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RATS; RATS, WISTAR; SEX FACTORS; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; TISSUE ADHESIONS;

EID: 48649084258     PISSN: 01028650     EISSN: 16782674     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S0102-86502008000400009     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Biondo-Simões MLP, Marques LO, Adur RC, Cavazzana W, Lima EB. Closure x non-closure of the peritoneum and the adhesions formation: experimental study in rats. Rev Bras Cir. 1996;86(6):303-5.
2. Holmdahl L, Risberg B, Beck DE, Burns JW, Chegini N, diZerega GS, Ellis H. Adhesions: pathogenesis and prevention-panel discussion and summary. Eur J Surg Suppl 1997;(577):56-2.
3. Kyzer S, Bayer I, Turani H, Chaimoff C. The influence of peritoneal closure on formation of intraperitoneal adhesions: an experimental study. Int J Tissue React. 1986;8(5):355-9.
4. Fry DE, Osler T. Abdominal wall considerations and complications in reoperative surgery: review. Surg Clin North Am. 1991;71(1):1-11.
5. Wadstrom J, Gerdin B. Closure of the abdominal wall; how and why? Clinical review. Acta Cir Scand. 1990;156(1):75-82.
6. Jones TE, Newell ET Jr, Brubaker RE. The use of alloy steel wire in the closure of abdominal wounds. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1941;72:1056-9.
7. Ceydeli A, Rucinski J, Wise L. Finding the best abdominal closure: an evidence-based review of the literature. Curr Surg 2005;62(2):220-5.
8. Holmdahl L, al Jabreen M, Risberg B. Experimental models for quantitative studies on adhesion formation in rats and rabbits. Eur Surg Res. 1994;26(4):248-6.
9. O'Leary DP, Coakley JB. The influence of suturing and sepsis on the development of postoperative peritoneal adhesions. Am R Coll Surg Engl. 1992;74(2):134-7.
10. diZerega GS, Campeau JD. Peritoneal repair and post-surgical adhesion formation. Hum Reprod Update. 2001;7(6):547-55.
11. Kapur ML, Daneswar A, Chopra P. Evaluation of peritoneal closure at laparotomy. Am J Surg. 1979;137(5):650-2.
12. Milewczyk M. Experimental studies on the development of peritoneal adhesions in cases of suturing and non-suturing of the parietal peritoneum in rabbits. Ginekol Pol. 1989;60(1):1-6.
13. Silva MAC, Bassi DG, Paula PR, Cauduro AB, Moura LAR, Novo NF, Speranzini MB. Influence of peritonel suturing on adhesion formation at the scar of the laparotomy wound: experimental study in dogs. Acta Cir Bras. 1990;5(2):71-4.
14. Salgado MI, Petroianu A, Burgarelli GL, Nunes CB, Alberti LR, Vasconcellos LS. Abdominal wall morphology and healing resistance after longitudinal and transversal laparotomy in rabbits. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2007;34(4):232-6.
15. Bamigboye AA, Hofmeyr GJ. Closure versus non-closure of the peritoneum at caesarean section (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 (4) [serial on line] Available from: http://cochrane.bvsalud.org/portal [accessed 14 fev 2008].