Comments on Simon Dietz and Nicholas Stern's why economic analysis supports strong action on climate change: A response to the Stern Review's critics

Review of Environmental Economics and Policy

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 309-310

  Mendelsohn, Robert ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 48549092218     PISSN: 17506816     EISSN: 17506824     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/reep/ren012     Document Type: Note

References (7)

1. Dietz, S., and N. Stern. 2008. Why economic analysis supports strong action on climate change: A response to the Stern Review's critics. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 2(1): 94-113.
2. Mendelsohn, R., A. Dinar, and L.Williams. 2006. The distributional impact of climate change on rich and poor countries. Environment and Development Economics 11: 1-20.
3. Nordhaus,W. 1991. To slow or not to slow: The economics of the greenhouse effect. Economic Journal 101: 920-37.
4. Pearce, D.W. Cline, A. Achanta, S. Fankhauser, R. Pachauri, R. Tol, and P. Vellinga. 1996. The social cost of climate change: Greenhouse damage and the benefits of control. In Climate Change 1995: Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change, eds. J. Bruce, H. Lee, and E. Haites, 179-224. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5. Stern, N. 2007. The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6. Tol, R. 2002. New estimates of the damage costs of climate change, Part I: Benchmark estimates. Environmental and Resource Economics 21: 47-73.
7. Weyant, J. P. 2008. A critique of the Stern Review's mitigation cost analyses and integrated assessment. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 2: 77-93.