Evaluation of hemodialysis adequacy using online Kt/V and single-pool variable-volume urea Kt/V

International Urology and Nephrology

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 771-778

  Grzegorzewska, Alicja E ^a,b   Banachowicz, Wojciech ^a  

^a POZNAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Poland)

^b International Dialysis Center   (Poland)

Author keywords

Daugirdas formula; Kt V; Online conductivity method; Urea measurements

Indexed keywords

UREA;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONDUCTANCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEMODIALYSIS; HEMODIALYSIS PATIENT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MACHINE; MALE; ONLINE MONITORING; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; REFERENCE VALUE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; UREA BLOOD LEVEL;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; KINETICS; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RENAL DIALYSIS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; UREA;

EID: 48549084029     PISSN: 03011623     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11255-008-9378-z     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. National Kidney Foundation (NFK) (1997) K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for hemodialysis adequacy. Am J Kidney Dis 30(3 suppl 2):S15-S136
2. National Kidney Foundation (NFK) (2001) K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for hemodialysis adequacy: Update. Am J Kidney Dis 37(11):S7-S64
3. Deziel C, Hirsch DJ, Hoult P et al (1999) Clinical practice guidelines for the delivery of hemodialysis. Canadian Society of Nephrology. J Am Soc Nephrol 10(suppl 13):S306-S310
4. The Renal Association (1997) Recommended standards for haemodialysis. Royal College of Physicians of London. Treatment of adult patients with renal failure. Recommended standards and audit measure
5. Daugirdas JT (1993) Second generation logarithmic estimates of single pool variable volume Kt/V: An analysis of error. J Am Soc Nephrol 4:1205-1213
6. Daugirdas JT, Depner TA, Gotch FA et al (1997) Comparison of methods to predict equilibrated Kt/V in the HEMO Pilot Study. Kidney Int 52:1395-1405
7. European best practice guidelines on haemodialysis (2007) Nephrol Dial Transplant 22(supp. 2):iI16-ii21
8. Materialy informacyjne NFZ (2006) Zala̧cznik nr 4 do szczególowych materialów informacyjnych - SOK - opis świadczenia "Hemodializa". http://www.nfz.gov.pl. Accessed 10 Feb 2007
9. Petitclerc T, Goux N, Reynier AL et al (1993) A model for non-invasive estimation of in-vivo dialyzer performances and patient's conductivity during hemodialysis. Int J Artif Organs 16:585-591
10. Polaschegg HD (1993) Automatic non-invasive intradialytic clearance measurements. Int J Artif Organs 16:185-191
11. Hernandez-Herrera G, Martin-Malo A, Rodriguez M et al (2001) Assessment of the length of each hemodialysis session by on - line dialysate urea monitoring. Nephron 89:37-42
12. Grzegorzewska AE, Banachowicz W, Leander M (2005) Results of improvement in adequacy of intermittent hemodialysis in uremic patients. Ann Acad Med Bialostocensis 50:314-318
13. Grzegorzewska AE, Banachowicz W (2006) Comparisons of Kt/V evaluated using an online method and calculated from urea measurements in patients on intermittent hemodialysis. Hemodial Int 10(suppl 2):S5-S9
14. Vlatkoviç V, Stojimiroviç B (2006) Determination of the delivered hemodialysis dose using standard methods and on-line clearance monitoring. Vojnosanit Pregl 63:743-747
15. Watson PE, Watson ID, Batt RD (1980) Total body water volumes for adult males and females estimated from simple anthropometric measurements. Am J Clin Nutr 33:27-39
16. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307-310
17. Petitclerc T, Bene B, Jacobs C et al (1995) Non-invasive monitoring of effective dialysis dose delivered to the haemodialysis patient. Nephrol Dial Transplant 10:212-216
18. Ing TS, Yu AW, Wong FK et al (1995) Collection of a representative fraction of total spent hemodialysate. Am J Kidney Dis 25:810-812
19. Argiles A, Ficheux A, Thomas M et al (1997) Precise quantification of dialysis using continuous sampling of spent dialysate and total dialysate volume measurement. Kidney Int 52:530-537
20. Raj DS, Tobe S, Saiphoo C et al (1997) Quantitating dialysis using two dialysate samples: A simple, practical and accurate approach for evaluating urea kinetics. Int J Artif Organs 20:422-427
21. O'Connor AS, Flauto RP, Sehgal AR (2003) Improving the accuracy of Kt/V measurement: The role of the technician. Dial Transplant 32:590-634
22. McIntyre CW, Lambie SH, Taal MW et al (2003) Assessment of haemodialysis adequacy by ionic dialysance: Intra-patient variability of delivered treatment. Nephrol Dial Transplant 18:559-563
23. Rački S, Zaputović L, Maleta I et al (2005) Assessment of hemodialysis adequacy by ionic dialysance: Comparison to standard method of urea removal. Ren Fail 27:601-604
24. Wuepper A, Tattersall J, Kraemer M et al (2003) Determination of urea distribution volume for Kt/V assessed by conductivity monitoring. Kidney Int 64:2262-2271
25. Manzoni C, Di Filippo S, Corti M et al (1996) Ionic dialysance as a method for the on - line monitoring of delivered dialysis without blood sampling. Nephrol Dial Transplant 11:2023-2030
26. Salahudeen AK, Fleischmann EH, Bower JD (1999) Impact of lower delivered Kt/V on the survival of overweight patients on hemodialysis. Kidney Int 56:2254-2259
27. Salahudeen AK, Dykes P, May W (2003) Risk factors for higher mortality at the highest levels of spKt/V in haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 18:1339-1344