Measurement accuracy and perceived quality of imaging systems for the evaluation of periodontal structures

Odontology

Volumn 96, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 55-60

  Baksi, B Güniz ^a  

^a EGE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Digital radiography, dental; Measurement perception; Radiographic image enhancement; Radiography, dental

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CADAVER; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVALUATION; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; JAW; METHODOLOGY; OSTEOLYSIS; PERIODONTAL LIGAMENT; RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH ROOT; X RAY FILM;

ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; ALVEOLAR PROCESS; CADAVER; HUMANS; PERIODONTAL LIGAMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL; TOOTH ROOT; X-RAY FILM; X-RAY INTENSIFYING SCREENS;

EID: 48449091436     PISSN: 16181247     EISSN: 16181255     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10266-008-0081-4     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Wenzel A. Computer aided image manipulation of intraoral radiographs to enhance diagnosis in dental practice: A review. Int Dent J 1993;43:99-108.
2. Wenzel A, Gröndahl HG. Direct digital radiography in the dental office. Int Dent J 1995;45:27-34.
3. Kaeppler G, Vogel A, Axmann-Krcmar D. Intra-oral storage phosphor and conventional radiography in the assessment of alveolar bone structures. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000;29:362-367.
4. Khocht A, Janal M, Harasty L, Chang KM. Comparison of direct digital and conventional intraoral radiographs in detecting alveolar bone loss. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134:1468-1475.
5. Kitagawa H, Farman AG, Scheetz JP, Brown WP, Lewis J, Benefiel M, Kuroyanagi K. Comparison of three intra-oral storage phosphor systems using subjective image quality. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000;29:272-276.
6. Nair MK, Ludlow JB, Tyndall DA, Platin E, Denton G. Periodontitis detection efficacy of film and digital images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;85:608-612.
7. Antrim DD. Reading the radiograph: A comparison of viewing techniques. J Endod 1983;9:502-505.
8. Vande Voorde HE, Bjorndahl AM. Estimating endodontic "working length" with paralleling radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 19 1969;27:106-110
9. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-174.
10. Hildebolt CF, Vannier MW, Shrout MK, Pilgram TK, Province M, Vahey EP, Rietz DW. Periodontal disease morbidity quantification. II. Validation of alveolar bone loss measurements and vertical defect diagnosis from digital bite-wing images. J Periodontol 1990;61:623-632.
11. Pepelassi EA, Diamanti-Kipioti A. Selection of the most accurate method of conventional radiography for the assessment of periodontal osseous destruction. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24:557-567.
12. Borg E, Gröndahl K, Gröndahl HG. Marginal bone level buccal to mandibular molars in digital radiographs from charge-coupled device and storage phosphor systems. An in vitro study. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24:306-312.
13. Kal BI, Baksi BG, Dundar N, Sen BH. Effect of various digital processing algorithms on the measurement accuracy of endodontic file length. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;103:280-284.
14. Li G, Sanderink GC, Welander U, McDavid WD, Nasstrom K. Evaluation of endodontic files in digital radiographs before and after employing three image processing algorithms. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33:6-11.
15. Nair MK, Ludlow JB, May KN, Nair UP, Johnson MP, Close JM. Diagnostic accuracy of intraoral film and direct digital images for detection of simulated recurrent decay. Oper Dent 2001;26:223-230.
16. Reddy MS. Radiographic methods in the evaluation of periodontal therapy. J Periodontol 1992;63(12 Suppl):1078-1084.
17. Chotas HG, Floyd CE Jr, Dobbins JT 3rd, Ravin CE. Digital chest radiography with photostimulable storage phosphors: Signal-to-noise ratio as a function of kilovoltage with matched exposure risk. Radiology 1993;186:395-398.
18. Motz JW, Danos M. Image information content and patient exposure. Med Phys 1978;5:8-22.
19. Kundel HL. Visual perception and image display terminals. Radiol Clin North Am 1986;24:69-78.
20. Hemminger BM, Johnston RE, Rolland JP, Muller KE. Introduction to perceptual linearization of video display systems for medical image presentation. J Digit Imaging 1995;8:21-34.
21. Hildebolt CF, Bartlett TQ, Brunsden BS, Hente NL, Gravier MJ, Walkup RK, Shrout MK, Vannier MW. Bitewing-based alveolar bone densitometry: digital imaging resolution requirements. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1994;23:129-134.
22. Borg E, Attaelmanan A, Gröndahl HG. Subjective image quality of solid-state and photostimulable phosphor systems for digital intra-oral radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000;29:70-75.
23. Huda W, Rill LN, Benn DK, Pettigrew JC. Comparison of a photostimulable phosphor system with film for dental radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;83:725-731.
24. Farman TT, Farman AG. Evaluation of a new F speed dental X-ray film. The effect of processing solutions and comparison with D and E speed films. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000;29:41-45.
25. Eickholz P, Riess T, Lenhard M, Hassfeld S, Staehle HJ. Digital radiography of interproximal bone loss; validity of different filters. J Clin Periodontol 1999;26:294-300.
26. Wolf B, von Bethlenfalvy E, Hassfeld S, Staehle HJ, Eickholz P. Reliability of assessing interproximal bone loss by digital radiography: intrabony defects. J Clin Periodontol 2001;28:869-878.
27. Benn DK. Estimating the validity of radiographic measurements of marginal bone height changes around osseointegrated implants. Implant Dent 1992;1:79-83.
28. Albandar JM, Abbas DK. Radiographic quantification of alveolar bone level changes. Comparison of 3 currently used methods. J Clin Periodontol 1986;13:810-813.
29. Bjorn H, Holmberg K. Radiographic determination of periodontal bone destruction in epidemiological research. Odontol Revy 1996;17:232-250.