Comparing the accuracy of digital subtraction angiography, CT angiography and MR angiography at estimating the volume of cerebral aneurysms

Interventional Neuroradiology

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 173-177

  Hanley, Michael ^a,b   Zenzen, W J ^a   Brown, M D ^a   Gaughen, J R ^a   Evans, A J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cerebral angiography; Intracranial aneurysm; Volume measurement

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN ARTERY ANEURYSM; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; DISEASE MODEL; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING;

EID: 48449089919     PISSN: 11239344     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/159101990801400208     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Tamatani S, Ito Y et Al: Evaluation of the stability of aneurysms after embolization using detachable coils: Correlation between stability of aneurysms and embolized volume of aneurysms. Am J Neuroradiol 23: 762-767, 2002.
2. Sluzewski M, Willem JvR et Al: Relation between aneurysm volume, packing, and compaction in 145 cerebral aneurysms treated with coils. Radiology 231: 653-658, 2004.
3. Piotin M, Gailloud P et Al: CT angiography, MR angiography and rotational digital subtraction angiography for volumetric assessment of intracranial aneurysms. An experimental study. Neuroradiology 45: 404-409, 2003.
4. Piotin M, Daghman B et Al: Ellipsoid approximation versus 3D rotational angiography in the volumetric assessment of intracranial aneurysms. Am J Neuroradiol 27(4): 839-842, 2006.