Decoherence of Bell states by local interactions with a dynamic spin environment

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 78, Issue 1, 2008, Pages

  Cormick, Cecilia ^a   Paz, Juan Pablo ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE BUENOS AIRES   (Argentina)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SPIN DYNAMICS;

BELL STATES; CORRELATION LENGTHS; DECOHERENCE; EXACT SOLUTIONS; HAMILTONIAN; INITIAL STATES; INTERACTION SITES; ISING CHAINS; LOCAL INTERACTIONS; NON-MARKOVIAN EFFECTS; NUMERICA L RESULTS; SPIN CHAINS; STRONG COUPLINGS; STRONG-COUPLING REGIME; TIME SCALING; WEAK-COUPLING REGIME;

FLOW INTERACTIONS;

EID: 48349135332     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.012357     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. H. D. Zeh, Found. Phys. FNDPA4 0015-9018 10.1007/BF00708603 3, 109 (1973).
2. J. P. Paz and W. H. Zurek, in Coherent Atomic Matter Waves, Les Houches Session LXXII, edited by, R. Kaiser, C. Westbrook, and, F. David, (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001), p. 533 - 614.
3. W. H. Zurek, Rev. Mod. Phys. RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.75.715 75, 715 (2003).
4. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2000).
5. C. Cormick and J. P. Paz, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.022317 77, 022317 (2008).
6. J. Jing and Z.-G. Lu, e-print arXiv:quant-ph/0612115 (2006).
7. T. Yu and J. H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.140404 93, 140404 (2004).
8. We avoid taking values of the Hamiltonian parameters for which the ground state | E0 is undefined because of degeneracy.
9. D. Rossini, T. Calarco, V. Giovannetti, S. Montangero, and R. Fazio, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.032333 75, 032333 (2007).
10. P. R. Levstein, G. Usaj, and H. M. Pastawski, J. Chem. Phys. JCPSA6 0021-9606 10.1063/1.475664 108, 2718 (1998).
11. E. Lieb, T. Schultz, and D. Mattis, Ann. Phys. ANPYA2 0003-3804 10.1016/0003-4916(61)90115-4 16, 407 (1961).
12. G. Vidal and R. F. Werner, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.032314 65, 032314 (2002).
13. P. Pfeuty, Ann. Phys. 57, 79 (1970). 0003-4916
14. E. Barouch and B. Mc Coy, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.3.786 3, 786 (1971).
15. F. M. Cucchietti, S. Fernandez-Vidal, and J. P. Paz, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.032337 75, 032337 (2007).
16. The populations of the particles that diagonalize the perturbed Hamiltonian in the ground state of the unperturbed chain are? E0 | ηj † (11) ηj (11) | E0 = (ht h) jj.
17. M. Cozzini, P. Giorda, and P. Zanardi, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.014439 75, 014439 (2007).
18. M.-C. Chung and I. Peschel, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.064412 64, 064412 (2001).
19. J. W. Negele and H. Orland, "Quantum many-particle systems," Frontiers in Physics (Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, CA, 1987), Vol. 68.
20. D. Rossini, P. Facchi, R. Fazio, G. Florio, D. A. Lidar, S. Pascazio, F. Plastina, and P. Zanardi, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.77. 052112 77, 052112 (2008).
21. For numerical computations, we use an auxiliary basis given by the Fourier transform of the operators cj. This basis diagonalized naturally the translation operator.