Roillo: Creating a social robot for playrooms

Proceedings - IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 587-592

  Michalowski, Marek P ^a   Sabanovic, Selma ^b   Michel, Philipp ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DESIGN PROCESSES; INTERACTIVE BEHAVIORS; NATURAL INTERACTIONS; PROTOTYPING; ROBOTIC PLATFORMS; SOCIAL ROBOTS;

ANIMATION; FLOW INTERACTIONS; REVERSE OSMOSIS; ROBOTICS; ROBOTS;

MACHINE DESIGN;

EID: 48349128191     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ROMAN.2006.314453     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. P. Andry, P. Gaussier, S. Moga, J. P. Banquet, and J. Nadel. Learning and communication via imitation: An autonomous robot perspective. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 31(5), September 2001.
2. A. G. Brooks and C. Breazeal. Working with robots and objects: Revisiting deictic reference for achieving spatial common ground. In Proceedings of Human-Robot Interaction, pages 297-304, 2006.
3. E. Chappie. Movement and sound: The musical language of body rhythms in interaction. In M. Davis, editor, Interaction Rhythms: Periodicity in Communicative Behavior. Human Sciences Press, New York, 1982.
4. T. Chartrand and J. Bargh. The chameleon effect: The perceptionbehavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76:893-910, 1999.
5. W. Condon. Communication: Rhythm and structure. In J. Evans and M. Clynes, editors, Rhythms in Psychological, Linguistic and Musical Processes. Charles C. Thomas Publisher, Springfield, 1986.
6. W. Condon and W. Ogston. Sound film analysis of normal and pathological behavior patterns. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 143:338-347, 1966.
7. W. Condon and L. Sander. Neonate movement is synchronized with adult speech: Interactional participation and language acquisition. Science, 183(4120):99-101, 1974.
8. C. Crick, M. Munz, T. Nad, and B. Scassellati. Robotic drumming: synchronization in social tasks. Under review, 2006.
9. K. Dautenhahn. Robots as social actors: Aurora and the case of autism. In Proc. if the International Cognitive Technology Conference, 1999.
10. T. Fong, I. Nourbakhsh, and K. Dautenhahn. A survey of socially interactive robots: Concepts, design and applications. Technical Report CMU-RI-TR-02-29, Carnegie Mellon University Robotics Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, November 2002.
11. E. Goffman. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. Anchor Books, New York, 1967.
12. E. Hatfield, J. Cacioppo, and R. Rapson. Emotional Contagion. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1994.
13. S. Johnson, V. Slaughter, and S. Carey. Whose gaze will infants follow? the elicitation of gaze-following in 12-month-olds. Journal of Developmental Science, 1(2):233-238, 1998.
14. M. Jones. Time, our lost dimension: Toward a new theory of perception, attention and memory. Psych. Review, 83:323-353, 1976.
15. B. Kalish. Body movement therapy for autistic children. Proceedings of the 3rd annual conference of the American Dance Therapy Association, 1968.
16. A. Kendon. Movement coordination in social interaction: Some examples described. Acta Psychologica, 32:100-125, 1970.
17. H. Kozima. Infanoid: A babybot that explores the social environment. In K. Dautenhahn, A. H. Bond, L. Canamero, and B. Edmonds, editors, Socially Intelligent Agents: Creating Relationships with Computers and Robots, pages 157-164. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.
18. H. Kozima, C. Nakagawa, Y. Yasuda, and D. Kosugi. A toy-like robot in the playroom for children with developmental disorders. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Development and Learning, San Diego,CA, 2004.
19. M. LaFrance. Posture mirroring and rapport. In M. Davis, editor, Interaction Rhythms: Periodicity in communication behavior. Human Sciences Press, New York, 1982.
20. E Michaud and C. Theberge-Turmel. Mobile robotic toys and autism. In K. Dautenhahn, A. Bond, L. Canamero, and B. Edmonds, editors, Socially Intelligent Agents - Creating Relationships with Computers and Robots, pages 125-132. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.
21. H. Ogawa and T. Watanabe. Interrobot: speech-driven embodied interaction robot. Advanced Robotics, 15:371-377, 2001.
22. M. Okada, S. Sakamoto, and N. Suzuki. Muu: Artificial creatures as an embodied interface. In ACM SIGGRAPH Conference Abstracts and Applications, page 91, New Orleans, 2000.
23. S. Penny. Embodied cultural agents: at the intersection of robotics, cognitive science, and interactive art. In AAAI Socially Intelligent Agents Symposium, 1997.
24. C. Plaisant, A. Druin, C. Lathan, K. Dakhane, K. Edwards, and J. Vice. A storytelling robot for pediatric rehabilitation. In Proceedings of ASSETS 2000, Washington DC, November 2000.
25. S. Restivo. Romancing the robots: Social robots and society. In Robot as Partner: An Exploration of Social Robots Workshop, International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2002.
26. C. Trevarthen. Communication and cooperation in early infancy: A description of primary intersubjectivity. In M. Bulowa, editor, Before speech: The beginning of human communication, pages 321-347. Cambridge University Press, London, 1979.
27. C. Trevarthen. Can a robot hear music? can a robot dance? can a robot tell what it knows or intends to do? can it feel pride or shame in company? - questions of the nature of human vitality. In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Epigenetic Robotics: Modeling Cognitive Development in Robotic Systems, 2002.
28. E. Tronick and J. Conn. Infant-mother face-to-face interaction: Age and gender difference in coordination and the occurrence of miscoordination. Child Development, 60(1):85-92, 1989.