When betting odds and credences come apart: More worries for Dutch book arguments

Analysis

Volumn 66, Issue 290, 2006, Pages 119-127

  Bradley, Darren ^a   Leitgeb, Hannes ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 48349126394     PISSN: 00032638     EISSN: 14678284     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8284.2006.00598.x     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Christensen, D. 1991. Clever bookies and coherent beliefs. Philosophical Review 100: 229-47
2. Elga, A. 2004. Defeating Dr. Evil with self-locating belief. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69: 383-96
3. Hitchcock, C. 2004. Beauty and the bets. Synthese 139: 405-20
4. Maher, P. 1993. Betting on Theories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
5. Ramsey. 1927. Truth and probability. In Philosophical Papers, ed. D. H Mellor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
6. Seidenfeld, T., M. Schervish and J. Kadane. 1990. When fair betting odds are not degrees of belief. PSA (proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association) 1: 517-24
7. Skyrms, B. 1987. Coherence. In Scientific Inquiry in Philosophical Perspective, ed. N. Rescher. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press
8. Talbott, W. 1991. Two principles of Bayesian epistemology. Philosophical Studies 62: 135-50