Classification of stimuli based on stimulus-response curves and their variability

Brain Research

Volumn 1225, Issue , 2008, Pages 57-66

  Lansky, Petr ^a,b   Pokora, Ondrej ^a,b   Rospars, Jean Pierre ^c  

^a INSTITUTE OF PHYSIOLOGY   (Czech Republic)

^b MASARYK UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^c INRA Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique   (France)

Author keywords

Fisher information; Information theory; Noise; Response curve; Sensory neurons; Stimulus identification

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; BRAIN FUNCTION; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NERVE POTENTIAL; NOISE; OLFACTORY NERVE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE VARIABLE; SENSORY NERVE CELL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STATISTICAL MODEL; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ANIMALS; ARTIFACTS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; INFORMATION THEORY; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NERVOUS SYSTEM PHYSIOLOGY; NEURONS, AFFERENT; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; SENSATION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 48349118520     PISSN: 00068993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.04.058     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Amari S., and Nakahara H. Difficulty of singularity in population coding. Neural Comput. 17 (2005) 839-858
2. Bethge M., Rotermund D., and Pawelzik K. Optimal short-term population coding: when Fisher information fails. Neural Comput. 14 (2002) 2317-2351
3. Bezzi M. Quantifying the information transmitted in a single stimulus. BioSystems 89 (2007) 4-9
4. Borst A., and Theunissen F.E. Information theory and neural coding. Nature Neursoci. 2 (1999) 947-957
5. Brunel N., and Nadal J.-P. Mutual information, Fisher information, and population coding. Neural Comput. 10 (1998) 1731-1757
6. Butts D.A. How much information is associated with a particular stimulus? Network: Comput. Neural Syst. 14 (2003) 177-187
7. Carandini M. Amplification of trial-to-trial response variability by neurons in visual cortex. PLoS Biology 2 (2004) 1483-1493
8. Cramer H. Mathematical Methods of Statistics (1946), Princeton Univ. Press
9. DeWeese M.R., and Meister M. How to measure the information gained from one symbol. Network 10 (1999) 325-340
10. Fano R.M. Transmission of information; a statistical theory of communication (1961), MIT Press, New York
11. Gerstner W., and Kistler W. Spiking neuron models (2002), Cambridge Univ. Press., Cambridge
12. Green D.M., and Swets J.A. Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics (1966), Wiley, New York
13. Greenwood P.E., and Lansky P. Optimum signal in a simple neuronal model with signal-dependent noise. Biol. Cybern. 92 (2005) 199-205
14. Greenwood P.E., and Lansky P. Information content in threshold data with non-Gaussian noise. Fluct. Noise Letters 7 (2007) L79-L89
15. Greenwood P.E., Ward L.M., Russel D.F., Neiman A., and Moss F. Stochastic resonance enhances the electrosensory information available to paddlefish for prey capture. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 4773-4776
16. Krivan V., Lansky P., and Rospars J.-P. Coding of periodic pulse stimulations in chemoreceptors. BioSystems 67 (2002) 121-128
17. Jenison R.L. Decoding first-spike latency: a likelihood approach. Neurocomputers 38 (2001) 239-248
18. Johnson D.H., and Ray W. Optimal stimulus coding by neural populations using rate codes. J. Comput. Neurosci. 16 (2004) 129-138
19. Kaissling K.E. Flux detectors versus concentration detectors: two types of chemoreceptors. Chem. Senses 23 (1998) 99-111
20. Kaissling K.E., and Rospars J.-P. Dose-response relationships in an olfactory flux detector model revisited. Chem. Senses 29 (2004) 529-531
21. Kostal L., Lansky P., and Rospars J.-P. Neuronal coding and spiking randomness. Eur. J. Neurosci. 6 (2007) 2693-2701
22. Kostal L., Lansky P., and Rospars J.-P. Efficient olfactory coding in the pheromone receptor neuron of a moth. PLoS Comput. Biology 4 (2008)
23. Koyama S., and Shinomoto S. Inference of intrinsic spiking irregularity based on the Kullback-Leibler information. BioSystems 89 (2007) 69-73
24. Lansky P., and Rospars J.-P. Coding of odor intensity. BioSystems 31 (1993) 15-38
25. Lansky P., and Getz W.M. Sensitivity and coding range in olfactory sensory neuron. Role of heterogeneity of receptors. Bull. Math. Biol. 63 (2001) 885-908
26. Lansky P., and Greenwood P.E. Optimal signal estimation in neuronal models. Neural Comput. 17 (2005) 2240-2257
27. Lansky P., and Greenwood P.E. Optimal signal in sensory neurons under extended rate coding concept. BioSystems 89 (2007) 10-15
28. Lansky P., Sacerdote L., and Zucca L. Optimum signal in a diffusion leaky integrate-and-fire neuronal model. Math. Biosci. 207 (2007) 261-274
29. Laughlin S.B. A simple coding procedure enhances a neuron's information capacity. Z. Naturforsch. 36 (1981) 910-912
30. Lewicki M. Efficient coding of natural sounds. Nat. Neurosci. 5 (2002) 356-363
31. McKeegan D.E.F. Spontaneous and odour evoked activity in single avian olfactory bulb neurones. Brain Res. 929 (2002) 48-58
32. Nakahara H., and Amari S. Information-geometric measure for neural spikes. Neural. Comput. 14 (2002) 2269-2316
33. Nizami L. Estimating auditory neuronal dynamic range using a fitted function. Hearing Res. 167 (2002) 13-27
34. Nizami L., and Schneider B. Auditory dynamic range derived from the mean rate-intensity function in the cat. Math. Biosci. 141 (1997) 1-28
35. Rieke F., Warland D., de Ruyter Van Steveninck R., and Bialek W. Spikes: Exploring the Neural Code (1999), MIT Press, Cambridge
36. Rospars J.-P., Krivan V., and Lansky P. Perireceptor and receptor events in olfaction. Comparison of concentration and flux detectors: a modeling study. Chem. Senses 25 (2000) 293-311
37. Rospars J.-P., Lansky P., Duchamp-Viret P., and Duchamp A. Relation between stimulus intensity and response in frog olfactory receptor neurons in vivo. Eur. J. Neurosci. 18 (2003) 1135-1154
38. Rospars J.-P., Lucas P., and Coppey M. Modelling the early steps of transduction in insect olfactory receptor neurons. BioSystems 89 (2007) 101-109
39. Stemmler M. A single spike suffices: the simplest form of stochastic resonance in model neurons. Network 7 (1996) 687-716
40. Tomaru A., and Kurahashi T. Mechanisms determining the dynamic range of the bullfrog olfactory receptor cell. J. Neurophysiol. 93 (2005) 1880-1888
41. Wilke S.D., and Eurich C.W. Representational accuracy of stochastic neural populations. Neural Comput. 14 (2002) 155-189
42. Wu S., Amari S., and Nakahara H. Information processing in a neuron ensemble with the multiplicative correlation structure. Neural Netw. 17 (2004) 205-214
43. Zhang K.C., and Sejnowski T.J. Neuronal tuning: to sharpen or broaden?. Neural Comput. 11 (1999) 75-84