25 Hydraulic geometry of stream reaches and ecological implications

Developments in Earth Surface Processes

Volumn 11, Issue , 2007, Pages 661-675

  Lamouroux, Nicolas ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 48349101734     PISSN: 09282025     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S0928-2025(07)11153-6     Document Type: Review

References (55)

1. Biggs B.J.F., Nikora V.I., and Snelder T.H. Linking scales of flow variability to lotic ecosystem structure and function. River Res. Appl. 21 (2005) 283-298
2. Bovee, K.D., 1982. A guide to stream habitat analysis using the instream flow incremental methodology. Instream Flow Information Paper 12. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Fort Collins, CO.
3. Buffin-Bélanger T., Roy A.G., and Kirkbride A.D. On large-scale flow structures in a gravel-bed river. Geomorphology 32 (2000) 417-435
4. Dingman S.L. Probability distribution of velocity in natural cross sections. Water Resour. Res. 25 (1989) 509-518
5. Ferguson R.I. Hydraulics and hydraulic geometry. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 10 (1986) 1-31
6. Frissell C.A., Liss W.J., Warren C.E., and Hurley M.D. A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: viewing streams in a watershed context. Environ. Manage. 10 (1986) 199-214
7. Ginot, V., 1998. Logiciel EVHA. Evaluation de l'habitat physique des poissons en rivière (version 2.0). Cemagref Lyon et Ministère de l'aménagement du Territoire et de l'Environnement, Direction de l'Eau, Paris, France.
8. Gore J.A., and Judy R.D. Predictive models of benthic macroinvertebrate density for use in instream flow and regulated flow management. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 38 (1981) 1363-1370
9. Griffiths G.A. Downstream hydraulic geometry and hydraulic similitude. Water Resour. Res. 39 (2003) 1094-1099
10. Guay J.C., Boisclair D., Leclerc M., et al. Science on the edge of spatial scales: a reply to the comments of Williams. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 58 (2001) 2108-2111
11. Guay J.C., Boisclair D., Rioux D., et al. Development and validation of numerical habitat models for juveniles of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 57 (2000) 2065-2075
12. Hart D.D., and Finelli C.M. Physical-biological coupling in streams: the pervasive effects of flow on benthic organisms. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30 (1999) 363-395
13. Hogan D.L., and Church M. Hydraulic geometry in small, coastal streams: progress towards quantification of salmonid habitat. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 46 (1989) 844-852
14. Jowett I.G. Models of the abundance of large brown trout in New Zealand rivers. North Am. J. Fish. Manage. 12 (1992) 417-432
15. Jowett I.G. A method for objectively identifying pool, run, and riffle habitats from physical measurements. New Zeal. J. Mar. Freshwat. Res. 27 (1993) 241-248
16. Jowett I.G. Hydraulic geometry of New Zealand rivers and its use as a preliminary method of habitat assessment. Regul. Rivers Res. Manage. 14 (1998) 451-466
17. Jowett, I.G. and Biggs, B.J.F., 2004. The effectiveness of habitat-based minimum flow assessments - six case studies, Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Ecohydraulics, September 12-17, IAHR, Madrid, pp. 695-701.
18. Knighton D. Fluvial forms and processes: a new perspective (1998), Wiley, New York
19. Kupferberg S.J. Hydrologic and geomorphic factors affecting conservation of a river-breeding frog (Rana boylii). Ecol. Appl. 6 (1996) 1332-1344
20. Lamouroux N. Depth probability distributions in stream reaches. J. Hydraul. Eng. 124 (1998) 224-227
21. Lamouroux N., and Capra H. Simple predictions of instream habitat model outputs for target fish populations. Freshwat. Biol. 47 (2002) 1543-1556
22. Lamouroux N., Capra H., Pouilly M., and Souchon Y. Fish habitat preferences at the local scale in large streams of southern France. Freshwat. Biol. 42 (1999) 673-687
23. Lamouroux N., Dolédec S., and Gayraud S. Biological traits of stream macroinvertebrate assemblages: effects of microhabitat, reach and basin filters. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 23 (2004) 449-466
24. Lamouroux N., and Jowett I.G. Generalized instream habitat models. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 62 (2005) 7-14
25. Lamouroux N., Poff N.L., and Angermeier P.L. Intercontinental convergence of stream fish community traits along geomorphic and hydraulic gradients. Ecology 83 (2002) 1792-1807
26. Lamouroux N., and Souchon Y. Simple predictions of instream habitat model outputs for fish habitat guilds in large streams. Freshwat. Biol. 47 (2002) 1531-1542
27. Lamouroux N., Souchon Y., and Hérouin E. Predicting velocity frequency distributions in stream reaches. Water Resour. Res. 31 (1995) 2367-2375
28. Lamouroux N., Statzner B., Fuchs U., et al. An unconventional approach to modeling spatial and temporal variability of local shear stress in stream segments. Water Resour. Res. 28 (1992) 3251-3258
29. Leftwich K.N., Angermeier P.L., and Dolloff C.A. Factors influencing behavior and transferability of habitat models for a benthic stream fish. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 126 (1997) 725-734
30. Leopold, L.B. and Maddock, T., 1953. The hydraulic geometry of stream channels and some physiographic implications. U.S. Geological Survey, Professional Paper 252. Washington, DC.
31. Millar R.G., and Quick M.C. Effect of bank stability on geometry of gravel rivers. J. Hydraul. Eng. 119 (1993) 1343-1363
32. Montgomery D.R. Geology, geomorphology, and the restoration ecology of salmon. GSA Today 14 (2004) 4-12
33. Mosley M.P. Response of braided rivers to changing discharge. J. Hydrol. 22 (1983) 18-63
34. Moyle P.B., and Herbold B. Life-history patterns and community structure in stream fishes of western North America: comparisons with eastern North America and Europe. In: Matthews W.J., and Heins D.C. (Eds). Community and Evolutionary Ecology of North American Stream Fishes (1987), University of Oklahoma Press, Oklahoma 25-32
35. Nelson R.L., Platts W.S., Larsen D.P., and Jensen S.E. Trout distribution and habitat in relation to geology and geomorphology in the North Fork Humboldt River drainage, northeastern Nevada. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 121 (1992) 405-426
36. Niemi G.J., De Vore P., Detenbeck N., et al. Overview of case studies on recovery of aquatic systems from disturbance. Environ. Manage. 14 (1990) 571-587
37. Nikora V.I., Aberle J., Biggs B.J.F., et al. Effects of fish size, time-to-fatigue and turbulence on swimming performance: a case study of Galaxias maculatus. J. Fish Biol. 63 (2003) 1365-1382
38. Orth D.J., and Maughan O.E. Evaluation of the incremental methodology for recommending instream flow for fishes. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 111 (1982) 413-445
39. Osborne L.L., Wiley M.J., and Larimore R.W. Assessment of the water surface profile model: accuracy of predicted instream fish habitat conditions in low-gradient, warmwater streams. Regul. Rivers Res. Manage. 2 (1988) 619-631
40. Park C.C. World-wide variations in hydraulic geometry exponents of stream channels: an analysis and some observations. J. Hydrol. 33 (1977) 133-146
41. Parker G. Self formed rivers with stable banks and mobile bed. Part 1: The sand-silt river. J. Fluid Mech. 89 (1978) 109-125
42. Phillips J.L., Ory J., and Talbot A. Anadromous salmonid recovery in the Umatilla river basin, Oregon: a case study. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 36 (2000) 1287-1308
43. Poff N.L., Allan J.D., Bain M.B., et al. The natural flow regime: a paradigm for river conservation and restoration. BioScience 47 (1997) 769-784
44. Puijalon S., and Bornette G. Morphological variation of two taxonomically distant plant species along a natural flow velocity gradient. New Phytol. 163 (2004) 651-660
45. Rao A.R., Voeller T., Delleur J.W., and Spacie A. Estimation of instream flow requirements for fish. J. Environ. Syst. 22 (1993) 381-396
46. Reiser D.W., Wesche T.A., and Estes C. Status of instream flow legislation and practices in North America. Fisheries 24 (1989) 24-26
47. Rhoads B.L. A continuously varying parameter model of downstream hydraulic geometry. Water Resour. Res. 27 (1991) 1865-1872
48. Rhoads B.L. Fluvial geomorphology. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 18 (1994) 103-123
49. Ridenour G.S. Interbasin consistency of Hydraulic geometry and its relationships with basin morphology and hydrology. Water Intl. 26 (2001) 569-577
50. Sagnes P., Gaudin P., and Statzner B. Shifts in morphometrics and their relation to hydrodynamic potential and habitat use during grayling ontogenesis. J. Fish Biol. 50 (1997) 846-858
51. Singh K.P., and McConkey Broeren S. Hydraulic geometry of streams and stream habitat assessment. J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 115 (1989) 583-597
52. Statzner B., and Müller R. Standard hemispheres as indicators of flow characteristics in lotic benthos research. Freshwat. Biol. 21 (1989) 445-459
53. Statzner B., Sagnes P., Champagne J.Y., and Viboud S. Contribution of benthic fish to the patch dynamics of gravel and sand transport in streams. Water Resour. Res. 39 (2003) 1-17
54. Stewardson M.J. Hydraulic geometry of stream reaches. J. Hydrol. 306 (2005) 97-111
55. Stewardson M.J., and McMahon T.A. A stochastic model of hydraulic variations within stream channels. Water Resour. Res. 38 (2002) 8.1-8.14