The necessity of biosemiotics: Matter-symbol complementarity

Introduction to Biosemiotics: The New Biological Synthesis

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 115-132

  Pattee, H H ^a,b  

^a State University of New York at Binghamton   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Constraints; Epistemic cut; Measurement; Protein folding; Self replication; Semantic information; Symbolic control; Von Neumann

Indexed keywords

EID: 48349097636     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-4814-9_4     Document Type: Chapter

References (36)

1. Barbieri, M. (2003). The Organic codes. An Introduction to Semantic Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
2. Barbieri, M. (2004). Life is "artifact-making", J. Biosemiotics, 1(1), 81-101.
3. Crutchfield, J. P. and Schuster, P., Eds. (2003). Evolutionary Dynamics: Exploring the Interplay of Selection, Accident, Neutrality, and Function. Oxford University Press, New York.
4. Eigen, M. (1971). Self-organization of matter and the evolution of biological macromolecules, Naturwissenschaften, 58, 465-523.
5. Eigen, M. and Schuster, P. (1979). The Hypercycle - A Principle of Natural Self-organization. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
6. Frauenfelder H. and Wolynes, P. G. (1994). Biomolecules: Where the physics of complexity and simplicity meet, Physics Today February 1994, pp. 58-64.
7. Ghiselin, M. T. (1997). Metaphysics and the Origin of Species. University of New York Press, Albany, New York.
8. Hoffmeyer, J. and Emmeche, C. (1991). Code duality and the semiotics of nature. In M. Anderson and F. Merrell, eds., On Semiotic Modeling. Mouton de Gruyter, New York.
9. Hoffmeyer, J. (2000). "Code-duality and the epistemic cut". In Jerry Chandler and Gertrudis Van de Vijver, Eds., Closure. Emergent Organizations and their Dynamics. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 901. pp. 175-186.
10. Hoffmeyer, J. (1998). The unfolding semiosphere. In G. V. de Vijver, S. Salthe, and M. Delpos, Eds., Biological and Epistemological Perspectives on Selection and Self-Organization, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
11. Jakobson, R. (1970). Linguistics. In Main Trends of Research in the Social and Human Sciences I, Paris-The Hague: Mouton-UNESCO, p. 438.
12. Juarrero, Alicia (1998). Causality as constraint. In Evolutionary Systems. Biological and Epistemological Perspectives on Selection and Self-Organization, G. V. de Vijver, S. Salthe, and M. Delpos, Eds., Kluwer, Dordrecht.
13. Kanerva, P. (1988). Sparse Distributed Memory, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
14. Kimura, M. (1983). The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
15. Mayr, Ernst (1982). The Growth of Biological Thought. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
16. Monod, Jacques (1971). Chance and Necessity, Knopf, New York.
17. Pattee, H. H. (1969). How does a molecule become a message? Developmental Biology Supplement, 3, 1-16.
18. Pattee, H. H. (1972). Laws and constraints, symbols and languages. In Waddington, C. H. Ed., Toward a Theoretical Biology 4. Essays, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp. 248-258.
19. Pattee, H. H. (1973). The physical basis and origin of hierarchical control, in Hierarchy Theory: The Challenge of Complex Systems, H. Pattee, Ed., George Braziller, New York, pp. 73-108.
20. Pattee, H. H. (1980). Clues from molecular symbol systems. In Signed and Spoken Languages: Biological Constraints on Linguistic Forms, Bellugi, U. and Studdert-Kennedy, M. Eds. Dahlem Konferenzen, Verlag Chemie GmbH, pp. 261-273.
21. Pattee, H. H. (2001a). The physics of symbols: bridging the epistemic cut, BioSystems, 60, 5-21.
22. Pattee, H. H. (2001b). Irreducible and complementary semiotic forms, Semiotica, 134(1-4), 341-358.
23. Polanyi, M. 1968. Life's irreducible structure. Science 160, 1308-1312.
24. Planck, Max (1960). Survey of Physical theory. Dover, New York, p. 64 and p. 66.
25. Pauli, W. (1994) The philosophical significance of the idea of complementarity, in Writings on Physics and Philosophy, C. P. Enz and K. von Meyenn, Eds., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1994, pp. 35-48 (see p. 41).
26. First published under the title "Die philosophische Bedeutung der Idee der Komplementarität" in Experientia 6(Heft 2), pp. 72-75, 1950.
27. Rocha, Luis (2001). Evolution with material symbol systems, BioSystems, 60(1-3), 95-121.
28. Schuster, P, Fontana, W., Stadler, P. F., and Hofacker, I. L. (1994). From sequences to shapes and back: a case study in RNA secondary structures, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 255, 279-284.
29. Schuster, P. (1998). Evolution in an RNA world. In M. G. Ord and L. A. Stocken, Eds., Foundations of Modern Biochemistry, Vol. IV: More Landmarks in Biochemistry. JAI Press, Stamford, CT, pp. 159-198.
30. Shannon, C. and Weaver, W. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Univ. of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL.
31. Simon, H. A., (1962). The architecture of complexity: hierarchic systems, Proc. Am. Philosophical Soc. 106(Dec. 1962), 467-482.
32. Reprinted in Simon, H. A., The Sciences of the Artificial, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1996, pp. 183-216.
33. Von Neumann, J. (1966). Theory of Self-reproducing Automata. Edited and completed by A. W. Burks, University of Illinois Press, Urbana and London, pp. 74-87 and pp. 121-123.
34. Von Neumann, J. (1955). Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp. 418-421.
35. Wolynes, P. G., Onuchic, J. N., and Thirumalai, D. (1995). Navigating the folding routes, Science, 267, 1.
36. Zurek, W. H. 1990. Complexity, Entropy, and the Physics of Information. Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, CA.