Modelling the propagation of effects of chronic exposure to ionising radiation from individuals to populations

Journal of Environmental Radioactivity

Volumn 99, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 1464-1473

  Alonzo, F ^a,b   Hertel Aas, T ^c   Gilek, M ^d   Gilbin, R ^b   Oughton, D H ^c   Garnier Laplace, J ^b  

^a DEI   (France)

^b INSTITUT DE RADIOPROTECTION ET DE SÛRETÉ NUCLÉAIRE IRSN   (France)

^c NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

^d School of Life Sciences Södertörn University   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Daphnid; Earthworm; Ionising radiation; Population growth

Indexed keywords

IONIZING RADIATION; NUCLEAR PHYSICS; RADIATION; RADIOACTIVITY;

CHRONIC EXPOSURE; EARTHWORM EISENIA FETIDA; GAMMA DOSE RATES; GENERATION TIMES; INVERTEBRATE SPECIES; IONISING RADIATION; LIFE HISTORIES; PARAMETER VALUES; POPULATION GROWTH; POPULATION MODELING;

RADIATION EFFECTS;

CRUSTACEAN; EARTHWORM; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FECUNDITY; GAMMA RAY RADIATION; LIFE HISTORY; POPULATION GROWTH; POPULATION MODELING; RADIATION EXPOSURE;

ARTICLE; CRUSTACEA; DAPHNIA; DOSE RESPONSE; EARTHWORM; EISENIA FOETIDA; EXPERIMENT; FERTILITY; INVERTEBRATE; IONIZING RADIATION; LIFE HISTORY; LONG TERM EXPOSURE; NEWBORN; NONHUMAN; PARAMETER; POPULATION; POPULATION GROWTH; POPULATION MODEL; PREDICTION; PROGENY; RADIATION EXPOSURE; REPRODUCTION; SPECIES; SURVIVAL; TIME;

ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; RADIATION, IONIZING; RISK ASSESSMENT;

DAPHNIA MAGNA; DAPHNIIDAE; EISENIA FETIDA; INVERTEBRATA;

EID: 48349083751     PISSN: 0265931X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2007.11.021     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Alonzo F., Gilbin R., Bourrachot S., Floriani M., Morello M., and Garnier-Laplace J. Effects of chronic internal alpha irradiation on physiology, growth and reproductive success of Daphnia magna. Aquat. Toxicol. 80 (2006) 228-236
2. Alonzo, F., Gilbin, R., Zeman, F., Garnier-Laplace, J. Increased effects of alpha radiation stress in Daphnia magna after chronic exposure over three successive generations. Aquat. Toxicol., in press. doi:10.1016/j.aquatox.2008.01.015.
3. In: Beresford N.A., Brown J., Copplestone D., Garnier-Laplace J., Howard B., Larsson C.M., Oughton D., Pröhl G., and Zinger I. (Eds). An INTEGRATED APPROACH to the assessment and management of environmental risks from ionising radiation. Description of purpose, methodology and application. EC project contract no. FI6R-CT-2004-508847 (2007). Available from: www.erica-project.org
4. Blaustein A.R., Romansic J.M., Kiesecker J.M., and Hatch A.C. Ultraviolet radiation, toxic chemicals and amphibian population declines. Diversity Distributions 9 (2003) 123-140
5. Chambers D.B., Garva A.L., and Osborne R.V. Choosing an alpha radiation weighting factor for doses to non-human biota. J. Environ. Radioact. 87 (2006) 1-14
6. Congdon J.D., Dunham A.E., Hopkins W.A., Rowe C.L., and Hinton T.G. Resource allocation-based life histories: a conceptual basis for studies of ecological toxicology. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 20 (2001) 1698-1703
7. Davidson C., Shaffer H.B., and Jennings M.R. Declines of the California red-legged frog: climate, UV-B, habitat, and pesticides hypotheses. Ecol. Appl. 11 (2001) 464-479
8. Duboudin C., Ciffroy P., and Magaud H. Effects of data manipulation and statistical methods on species sensitivity distributions. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 23 (2004) 489-499
9. EC, 2003. Technical guidance document in support of Commission Directive 93/67/EEC on risk assessment for new notified substances and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 on risk assessment for existing substances, Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market. Part II. Luxembourg, Office for Official Publication of the European Communities. Report nr EUR 20418 EN/2.
10. ERICA. Derivation of predicted no effect dose rate values for ecosystems (and their sub-organisaonal levels) exposed to radioactive substances. Deliverable D5. In: Garnier-Laplace J., and Gilbin R. (Eds). 6th Framework, Contract N°FI6R-CT-2003-508847 (2006), European Commission
11. FASSET. Radiation effects on plants and animals. Deliverable 4. In: Woodhead D., and Zinger I. (Eds). FASSET Project Contract FIGE-CT-2000-00102 (2003)
12. Forbes V.E., and Calow P. Extrapolation in ecological risk assessment: balancing pragmatism and precaution in chemical controls legislation. BioScience 52 (2002) 249-257
13. Garnier-Laplace J., Copplestone D., Gilbin R., Ciffroy P., Gilek M., Agüero A., Björk M., Oughton D., Jaworska A., Larsson C.M., and Hingston J. Issues and practices in the use of effects data from FREDERICA in the ERICA Integrated Approach. J. Environ. Radioact 99 (2008) 1474-1483
14. Hammers-Wirtz M., and Ratte H.T. Offspring fitness in Daphnia: is the Daphnia reproduction test appropriate for extrapolating effects on the population level?. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 19 (2000) 1856-1866
15. Hertel-Aas T., Oughton D.H., Jaworska A., Bjerke H., Salbu B., and Brunborg G. Effects of chronic gamma irradiation on reproduction in the earthworm Eisenia fetida (Oligochaeta). Radiat. Res. 168 (2007) 515-526
16. Kammenga J.E., Spurgeon D.J., Svendsen C., and Weeks J.M. Explaining density-dependent regulation in earthworm populations using life-history analysis. Oikos 100 (2003) 89-95
17. Klok C., and de Roos A.M. Impact of toxicants on earthworm populations: a modeling approach. In: Sheppard S.C., Bembridge J.D., Holmstrup M., and Posthuma L. (Eds). Advances in Earthworm Ecotoxicology, Proceedings from the Second International Workshop on Earthworm Écotoxicologie (1997) 295-309
18. Kooijman S.A.L.M. Dynamic Energy and Mass Budgets in Biological Systems. second ed. (2000), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
19. Leslie P.H. On the use of matrices in certain population mathematics. Biometrika 33 (1945) 183-212
20. OECD. Test no. 211: Daphnia magna reproduction test. OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals 2 (2007) 1-21
21. OECD. Test no. 222: earthworm reproduction test (Eisenia fetida/Eisenia andrei). OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals 1 (2007) 1-18
22. Pennington D.W. Extrapolating ecotoxicological measures from small data sets. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 56 (2003) 238-250
23. Réal A., Sundell-Bergman S., Knowles J.F., Woodhead D.S., and Zinger I. Effects of ionising radiation exposure on plants, fish and mammals: relevant data for environmental radiation protection. J. Radiol. Prot. 24 (2004) 123-137
24. Reinecke A.J., and Reinecke S.A. Earthworms as test organisms in ecotoxicological assessment of toxicant impacts on ecosystems. In: Edwards C.A. (Ed). Earthworm Ecology. second ed. (2004), CRC Press, Boca Raton (US) 299-319
25. Spurgeon D.J., Weeks J.M., and Van Gestel C.A.M. A summary of eleven years progress in earthworm ecotoxicology. Pedobiologia 47 (2003) 588-606
26. Stark J.D., Banks J.E., and Vargas R. How risky is risk assessment: the role that life history strategies play in susceptibility of species to stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101 (2004) 732-736
27. Venter J.M., and Reinecke A.J. The life-cycle of the compost worm Eisenia fetida (Oligochaeta). S. Afr. J. Zool. 23 (1988) 161-165
28. Versteeg D., Belanger S., and Carr G. Understanding single-species and model ecosystem sensitivity: data-based comparison. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 18 (1999) 1329-1346
29. Watanabe H., and Tsukamoto J. Seasonal changes in size, class and age structure of the lumbricid Eisenia foetida population in a field compost and its practical application as the decomposer of organic waste matter. Rev. D'Ecol. Biol. Sol. 13 (1976) 141-146
30. Wennergren U., and Stark J. Modeling long-term effects of pesticides on populations: beyond just counting dead animals. Ecol. Appl. 10 (2000) 295-302